gcc archive
author index for January, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

=?big5?b?o6upWw==?=

2004-01-08 11:34 wanna add -march=c3 and -march=c3-2 support

香港公司注册网

Etienne Lorrain

2004-01-05 13:34 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
2004-01-29 13:15 gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-30 09:44 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register

Grégoire Péan

2004-01-25 14:13 About embedding GCC, GCC compiling with Visual Studio...

Julian Brown

2004-01-27 18:26 SH4 regression testing
2004-01-28 16:06 Re: SH4 regression testing

Manuel Báez

2004-01-22 15:07 Inline questions

Pop Sébastian

2004-01-02 23:29 Re: Scalar analyzer dependent on DCE2?

Gábor Lóki

2004-01-15 14:09 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE

Jan Ringoš

2004-01-04 21:23 New GCC extension hint

Делчо Делов

2004-01-19 16:07 GCC XML back end

[000](|)ETeria

2004-01-18 06:08 gcc-3.3.2 OK

\"Gagan Deep Singh\"

2004-01-31 09:54 documentation regarding gcc

admin2

2004-01-05 09:22 C compiler for Win 95/98

Alan Modra

2004-01-01 23:44 Re: Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFI frame support]
2004-01-08 00:08 mainline -mcpu=power4
2004-01-08 00:57 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4
2004-01-09 05:49 Re: Problem building libsdc++-v3 in a cross compile environment (zSeries, PPC64)
2004-01-13 04:15 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-29 03:43 powerpc64 dwarf2 frame unwinding
2004-01-31 10:41 split_complex_* flaw

Albert Chin

2004-01-08 18:26 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-10 21:29 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)

Aldy Hernandez

2004-01-27 21:08 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide
2004-01-28 13:17 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide
2004-01-30 04:13 mbox formatted archive for current month
2004-01-30 04:31 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month

Alex Perez

2004-01-20 20:54 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-20 21:55 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

Alex Rosenberg

2004-01-01 02:34 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction

Alexander Malmberg

2004-01-20 23:34 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

Alexandre Oliva

2004-01-12 16:15 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-12 16:51 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-12 21:57 Re: --with-sysroot demands /usr/include?
2004-01-13 01:02 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-13 13:58 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-20 02:44 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 02:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 19:03 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 22:06 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 22:12 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-21 00:02 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-21 00:09 Re: gcc
2004-01-21 19:13 Re: Could GCC interested in a faster STRSTR function ?
2004-01-23 03:28 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 13:24 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 20:33 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-25 19:40 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC...
2004-01-26 19:30 Re: compile speed [was: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]
2004-01-28 12:51 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc

Alfred M. Szmidt

2004-01-05 21:40 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-05 21:49 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -

Ananda Vardhan

2004-01-02 00:25 gcc 3.3.1 Superblock Scheduling

Andi Kleen

2004-01-25 15:48 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-25 19:28 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2

Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci

2004-01-21 22:29 Re: Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop

Andreas Jaeger

2004-01-02 08:45 ada broken on mainline (i686-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu)
2004-01-02 17:57 Re: ada broken on mainline (i686-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu)
2004-01-13 07:15 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-16 17:09 Re: Snapshots v.s. CVS Head
2004-01-17 15:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 10:36 Re: GCC on SPEC.org
2004-01-19 07:10 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 20:14 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers
2004-01-20 20:56 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers
2004-01-21 06:36 Re: Improvements for ColdFire v4
2004-01-22 16:41 GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-22 17:54 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-23 12:44 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 13:03 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 20:20 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-30 05:46 Re: New loop unroller broken?

Andreas Schwab

2004-01-02 17:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:33 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:39 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 00:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 00:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 14:16 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 14:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 17:59 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-05 16:34 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-07 10:54 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 11:02 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 09:45 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 09:49 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 09:57 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-08 10:03 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-09 02:13 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 16:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 16:35 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 18:01 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 20:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 20:37 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 12:14 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 12:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 17:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 17:13 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 18:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 09:40 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 14:00 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-16 11:27 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-17 01:01 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-17 03:57 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-17 16:19 [tree-ssa] ia64 bootstrap broken
2004-01-20 09:15 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-01-21 00:30 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-22 10:00 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ???
2004-01-23 22:21 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-28 12:23 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc
2004-01-28 14:36 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)
2004-01-28 15:26 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)
2004-01-29 11:15 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-29 23:25 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-30 10:04 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status

Andreas Tobler

2004-01-05 12:13 fastjar question
2004-01-05 22:09 Re: fastjar question
2004-01-06 05:30 Re: fastjar question
2004-01-07 21:32 Re: libffi automake question
2004-01-07 21:48 Re: libffi automake question
2004-01-09 13:39 [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-10 08:06 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 08:50 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-10 10:03 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-17 15:35 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created
2004-01-17 15:59 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created
2004-01-18 18:10 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change
2004-01-23 11:14 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype
2004-01-24 08:23 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin
2004-01-24 15:13 Re: Invalid libffi testcase?
2004-01-24 16:18 Re: Invalid libffi testcase?

Andrew

2004-01-22 06:48 gcc help

Andrew Cagney

2004-01-02 16:46 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?

Andrew Haley

2004-01-05 10:46 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-05 15:23 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-06 20:24 FP consistency and -O2
2004-01-12 14:48 Classifying bugs
2004-01-14 20:12 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-14 21:02 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-15 10:09 bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, Boolean.java
2004-01-19 12:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:38 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 18:11 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 15:27 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-29 13:44 gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-29 14:33 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-30 11:03 C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c]
2004-01-30 17:41 GCC build of gcc-3_4-branch failed for native with your patch on 2004-01-30T12:07:11Z.
2004-01-31 18:24 Re: C99 usage in gcc

Andrew J. Hutton

2004-01-30 14:19 Announcement: 2004 GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit

Andrew MacLeod

2004-01-21 15:58 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
2004-01-22 14:59 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion

Andrew Morton

2004-01-23 23:26 mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-23 23:42 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-24 01:37 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-24 05:29 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-26 06:51 inlining between sections
2004-01-26 09:18 Re: inlining between sections

Andrew Pinski

2004-01-03 21:32 Re: XPASSes: testcases fixed?
2004-01-05 08:27 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-06 03:05 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 04:38 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-09 05:43 Re: CORRECTED: Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort?
2004-01-10 07:50 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 07:29 Release Criteria (Was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-13 00:55 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-14 00:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 01:05 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 02:52 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-15 19:35 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-16 23:47 Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup
2004-01-17 00:35 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:55 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 06:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 06:22 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 19:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:09 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-18 16:07 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 19:29 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level
2004-01-18 19:49 [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 23:18 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 23:45 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-19 12:13 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 22:41 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 03:13 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]
2004-01-20 03:14 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 03:17 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]
2004-01-20 04:28 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 16:57 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-21 22:12 Re: Darwin 3.4 make check results with -mcpu=G5
2004-01-22 18:53 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 20:00 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-24 05:43 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-25 01:12 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 06:21 Creating libobjc branch
2004-01-29 19:16 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 01:29 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c
2004-01-30 01:32 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c
2004-01-31 09:41 Re: Anonymous Namespaces

Andrew Sutton

2004-01-27 18:37 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:40 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 22:30 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Andrew Walrond

2004-01-05 08:17 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-05 15:20 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-17 11:08 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

Andris Pavenis

2004-01-05 12:23 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98

Apodmaniczky

2004-01-11 04:49 Modern way of losing twisters we;ght natural Ukrainians

Archie Cobbs

2004-01-31 00:05 BB reordering question
2004-01-31 20:01 Re: BB reordering question

Arnaud Charlet

2004-01-10 21:31 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-12 08:34 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 08:48 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 12:53 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-12 15:33 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 22:05 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-17 19:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:23 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline)
2004-01-19 22:11 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline)
2004-01-26 22:45 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler
2004-01-27 22:42 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler
2004-01-28 11:41 new error when reconfiguring gcc
2004-01-28 12:59 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc
2004-01-28 15:43 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)

Arpad Beszedes

2004-01-15 12:55 Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE
2004-01-15 13:01 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE
2004-01-16 14:54 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE

Art Haas

2004-01-30 15:31 Bootstrap using --with-gc=zone is broken

ashwani

2004-01-28 05:21 Help needed on "insn does not satisfy its constraints"

aspiesrule

2004-01-25 17:54 GCC, OOP, and GC...
2004-01-26 22:34 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC...

Axel Siebenwirth

2004-01-25 22:32 (gcc-3.4.cvs) undefined reference to `__udivdi3'

B. Kosnik

2004-01-03 18:03 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?

Balint Cristian

2004-01-12 00:49 Programs compiled with "-fPIE" + "-pie" seg fault on sparc-linux [testcase].

Ben Elliston

2004-01-29 00:36 Re: Help installing gcc
2004-01-29 23:43 build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c
2004-01-29 23:55 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c
2004-01-30 10:54 DejaGnu 1.4.4 release

Benjamin Kosnik

2004-01-14 17:07 g++ 3.4 breakage
2004-01-14 17:07 g++ 3.4 breakage
2004-01-14 17:09 Re: compilation error ssa-branch
2004-01-14 17:42 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-20 16:07 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political pointof view

Bernardo Innocenti

2004-01-04 16:34 Combined tree build broken?
2004-01-04 17:50 Re: Combined tree build broken?
2004-01-05 04:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-06 01:07 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-06 03:45 Re: Combined tree build broken?
2004-01-06 11:41 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-06 23:24 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 00:15 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 01:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 02:20 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 19:42 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 20:58 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 10:32 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 11:56 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 22:11 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-09 05:53 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-10 21:09 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 06:33 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 21:45 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 22:25 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 21:58 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 00:46 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 00:56 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 00:59 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 01:13 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 00:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 01:16 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 02:50 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 19:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 22:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 23:21 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 23:21 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-16 19:03 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-17 01:28 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-18 01:50 more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-01-18 04:52 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-01-18 10:07 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-01-20 10:36 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-01-24 13:23 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports?
2004-01-25 10:07 Re: [Bug target/13312] [m68k] C++ produces stack frame damaging codefor Coldfire

Bernd Jendrissek

2004-01-20 09:23 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]

Bernd Schmidt

2004-01-27 23:18 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Bill Cunningham

2004-01-20 03:23 gcc

Bob Hall

2004-01-08 17:18 784 unexpected failures with g77-3.3 on HP-UX 11.11 (long)

Bonzini

2004-01-28 09:37 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 15:05 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword?

Bradley Lucier

2004-01-11 22:41 Bootstrap time jumps on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
2004-01-12 01:42 Re: Bootstrap time jumps on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
2004-01-21 18:44 Darwin 3.4 make check results with -mcpu=G5

Bruce Korb

2004-01-02 03:53 RE: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 16:31 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 18:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 05:54 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 17:07 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 17:59 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 18:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 18:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 23:09 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-19 20:38 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-19 21:20 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-20 21:14 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9

Bruce Stephens

2004-01-30 15:19 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c]

cgd

2004-01-12 19:44 Re: Question regarding mipsisa32r2 instruction set
2004-01-23 21:01 mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 21:18 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 21:55 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-24 22:22 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-24 22:23 Re: mips address+symbol issue.

Chiaki

2004-01-21 05:34 Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page explicitly.Also a GCC source mirror?
2004-01-21 07:15 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web pageexplicitly. Also a GCC source mirror?
2004-01-21 16:47 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page

Chris Lattner

2004-01-04 00:47 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 07:57 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 08:17 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 03:29 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-10 22:45 Re: Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-13 16:03 RE: Number of functions optimized by GCSE module
2004-01-18 22:18 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:40 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:42 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:44 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:50 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 01:36 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-31 18:39 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 19:39 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 20:35 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 22:29 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 23:34 Re: Anonymous Namespaces

Christian Joensson

2004-01-28 14:03 Many(!) failures for 3.4.0 20040127 (prerelease) testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin
2004-01-30 13:38 gctest failure for gcc 3.4.0 20040130 on i686-linux...
2004-01-30 14:16 Re: gctest failure for gcc 3.4.0 20040130 on i686-linux...

Christoph Hellwig

2004-01-27 18:31 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris

Christopher Faylor

2004-01-10 05:48 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98
2004-01-11 01:37 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98

Cook, Kelley (R.K.)

2004-01-07 22:27 RE: libffi automake question

Craig Maloney

2004-01-28 17:25 linking c code against fortran libraries
2004-01-29 15:25 Re: linking c code against fortran libraries

D. Starner

2004-01-20 03:00 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 05:19 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

daizisheng

2004-01-26 05:58 Re: Re: about writing a new front end for gcc
2004-01-28 06:49 about the interfaces of a front end
2004-01-28 07:46 Re: Re: about the interfaces of a front end

Dale Johannesen

2004-01-06 22:39 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-06 23:05 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-14 21:02 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md?
2004-01-19 20:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 20:57 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-20 00:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 20:08 [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers
2004-01-20 20:21 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers
2004-01-20 21:05 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers
2004-01-22 19:04 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 19:08 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 19:50 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-28 23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-29 18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-30 00:22 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-30 18:05 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines

Dan Kegel

2004-01-05 04:35 re: Cross Compiler Build Fails due to an Object File !
2004-01-05 04:46 Right way to add testcase that contains shared library?
2004-01-05 06:50 Re: Right way to add testcase that contains shared library?
2004-01-16 15:39 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu
2004-01-16 16:15 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu

Dan Nicolaescu

2004-01-03 03:15 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 01:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 07:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-19 17:58 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

Daniel Berlin

2004-01-01 14:46 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)
2004-01-01 17:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 16:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 20:10 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:13 Scalar analyzer dependent on DCE2?
2004-01-04 00:57 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 02:56 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 00:52 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 03:10 [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes
2004-01-05 04:27 Re: [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes
2004-01-05 06:05 Re: [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements
2004-01-05 06:34 Re: [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements
2004-01-05 17:35 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 19:18 Re: [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes
2004-01-05 20:14 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-06 17:50 [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms
2004-01-06 17:54 Re: [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms
2004-01-06 20:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms
2004-01-06 23:56 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-07 00:40 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-08 16:04 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:04 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:04 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:06 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:25 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:29 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 19:13 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation
2004-01-08 19:47 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation
2004-01-09 03:45 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation
2004-01-10 22:19 Re: Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-11 22:38 Cause of lno failure on powerpc
2004-01-13 23:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 23:53 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 23:24 Bug 13689 as further evidence of my point about maintainers
2004-01-16 03:57 Re: [Bug optimization/13629] [tree-ssa][Regression] dominator optimizations can pessimize code
2004-01-17 00:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:38 All 3.4 regressions have been marked as 3.5 regressions
2004-01-17 14:45 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 15:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:40 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:10 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 20:13 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 20:35 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 03:47 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 15:50 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 15:54 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 16:50 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 22:52 [tree-ssa]: Interprocedural aliasing and function local results
2004-01-19 23:16 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-19 23:43 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 14:52 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 20:32 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-20 20:45 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-21 21:00 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 21:31 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-25 21:43 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-26 21:37 Re: Is Banshee required for tree-ssa?
2004-01-27 15:40 Re: commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 15:56 Re: commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 16:38 Re: commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 16:52 Re: commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 17:57 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:33 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:58 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-28 18:20 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 23:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-30 19:45 Re: Bootstrap using --with-gc=zone is broken

Daniel Jacobowitz

2004-01-01 22:59 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 04:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 05:23 When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-03 18:12 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 18:54 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 18:59 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-04 20:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 17:30 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 19:02 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 20:17 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-06 15:02 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-06 16:23 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-06 16:36 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-06 23:36 Recog/asm_operands problem with MIPS/gcc3.3
2004-01-08 22:42 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-09 00:15 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-09 19:23 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-09 21:20 RFC: Thumb and unwind information
2004-01-12 23:55 Re: --with-sysroot demands /usr/include?
2004-01-13 00:06 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 03:26 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-13 15:04 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-13 21:19 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-14 19:56 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md?
2004-01-16 03:39 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-17 19:22 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 20:02 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change
2004-01-20 15:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 15:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 15:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 17:02 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-23 23:32 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-24 01:10 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-24 01:19 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-24 05:08 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs
2004-01-24 05:08 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-25 17:04 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-29 18:12 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host'

Daniel Kegel

2004-01-08 18:39 re: GCC porting problem help
2004-01-08 22:09 --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-10 02:06 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-12 20:49 --with-sysroot demands /usr/include?
2004-01-12 23:06 Re: --with-sysroot demands /usr/include?
2004-01-13 01:37 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-13 21:02 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"
2004-01-15 02:46 --with-libs busted?
2004-01-27 21:37 re: SH4 regression testing

Daniel S. Wilkerson

2004-01-10 03:15 offering a full implementation of C99 compound initializers traversal

dank

2004-01-05 21:38 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-15 06:20 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu

Dara Hazeghi

2004-01-17 17:17 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 07:18 Re: Cross compiler build fails for bad inclusion
2004-01-18 09:40 GCC on SPEC.org
2004-01-20 08:38 Re: GCC on SPEC.org
2004-01-21 00:51 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-23 17:57 [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra?
2004-01-23 18:11 Unreviewed patches
2004-01-23 18:47 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-23 19:17 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-23 20:07 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-23 22:54 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra?

Darren Humphrey

2004-01-14 20:21 C++ support question

David Ayers

2004-01-21 11:15 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-21 16:12 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

David Berner

2004-01-14 15:29 compilation error ssa-branch
2004-01-15 12:20 Re: compilation error ssa-branch

David Edelsohn

2004-01-04 00:22 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-08 00:52 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4
2004-01-08 01:07 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4
2004-01-08 04:53 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-08 20:16 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-10 22:08 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-11 22:51 Re: Bootstrap time jumps on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
2004-01-13 22:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-17 06:19 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 01:24 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 03:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 18:24 GCC 3.5 "integration branch"
2004-01-23 02:56 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-23 19:17 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-30 06:10 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-30 19:27 New PowerPC bootstrap failure
2004-01-31 01:42 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 02:00 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 04:29 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch
2004-01-31 21:19 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch

DAVID MAY

2004-01-26 20:38 Substantial sort algorithm slow down from PIII to P4

David Ohlemacher

2004-01-05 16:41 How to install multiple versions of gcc FAQ

dean richey

2004-01-22 05:54 Cant build 3.4 ss's 20040114 or 20040121

Denis Chertykov

2004-01-20 16:35 Re: [new-ra] Development status?
2004-01-20 17:26 Re: [new-ra] Development status?

Dennis Foong

2004-01-10 01:38 How to Online Compiler Using GCC

Denny

2004-01-07 21:46 New Vi@gra store

Devang Patel

2004-01-05 18:28 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 18:34 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 18:49 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 19:03 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 19:15 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 19:36 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-06 02:21 [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-06 20:21 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-06 20:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA
2004-01-07 20:28 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-07 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 04:25 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 04:48 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-08 19:32 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question
2004-01-08 23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
2004-01-09 19:08 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-09 19:30 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-10 01:12 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
2004-01-13 02:24 [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions
2004-01-13 18:42 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions
2004-01-13 20:20 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions
2004-01-30 22:21 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32

Dhammika Pathirana

2004-01-08 17:47 Is __default_alloc_template thread safe on Solaris?

Diego Novillo

2004-01-08 15:00 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:42 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
2004-01-08 16:52 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating newvariables
2004-01-08 17:39 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)
2004-01-08 17:41 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question
2004-01-08 17:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA
2004-01-08 19:13 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation
2004-01-08 19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question
2004-01-09 03:37 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
2004-01-12 21:04 Re: parallel code generation
2004-01-17 00:19 [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 01:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:36 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 05:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 05:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 05:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 06:38 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 08:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 16:26 Re: [tree-ssa] ia64 bootstrap broken
2004-01-17 17:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:50 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:58 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:36 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 21:45 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 21:47 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:49 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 13:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 14:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 18:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 20:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 02:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 03:27 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 11:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 16:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 16:54 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a politicalpoint of view
2004-01-20 20:07 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 16:11 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
2004-01-21 19:43 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 20:42 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 20:50 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 23:58 tree-ssa and compile-time performance regressions
2004-01-22 00:28 Re: tree-ssa and compile-time performance regressions
2004-01-27 18:03 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:24 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:38 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-28 18:23 [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-28 23:58 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-30 13:36 [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-01-26
2004-01-31 00:54 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 01:38 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 04:29 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 15:25 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function

DJ Delorie

2004-01-06 01:19 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-06 02:15 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-06 02:54 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-14 18:28 Re: ./ diff config
2004-01-19 19:33 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-21 01:26 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 02:23 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 19:04 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 20:59 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-22 01:17 gcc's limits.h vs POSIX
2004-01-22 01:40 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX
2004-01-22 01:59 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX
2004-01-27 20:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 23:46 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 00:37 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 04:21 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month

Dmitry Semyonov

2004-01-03 11:13 Re: [wince-devel] Link .o generated by GCC(arm-wince-pe) from EmbededVC ???

Donald R. Laster Jr.

2004-01-22 01:39 An error message enhancement request

Dorit Naishlos

2004-01-01 14:11 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)

Douglas B Rupp

2004-01-23 20:39 @D not replaced

duchier

2004-01-22 12:34 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos?
2004-01-22 16:23 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos?

Dylan Cuthbert

2004-01-25 06:48 gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide
2004-01-27 06:07 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide
2004-01-28 08:49 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide
2004-01-28 14:58 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide

Edward S. Peschko

2004-01-27 07:37 open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-27 18:38 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-29 23:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 00:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 00:47 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 21:19 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 23:19 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32

Eric Botcazou

2004-01-05 18:13 Re: Building gcc for SunOS5.6
2004-01-07 11:03 Re: Building gcc for SunOS5.6
2004-01-07 18:55 Re: trouble with porting architecture
2004-01-08 07:55 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-09 08:01 Re: Adding soft-registers
2004-01-09 15:31 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-10 09:39 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-10 11:06 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-12 07:52 FP registers alignment on SPARC64
2004-01-16 18:20 Re: succesful bootstrap: 3.3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
2004-01-17 06:36 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created
2004-01-17 15:57 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created
2004-01-19 04:58 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-19 07:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 20:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 20:36 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-19 21:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 21:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 22:03 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 22:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 04:52 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 09:09 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]
2004-01-23 12:47 [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris
2004-01-24 14:37 Invalid libffi testcase?
2004-01-24 15:24 Re: Invalid libffi testcase?
2004-01-24 18:33 Re: Invalid libffi testcase?
2004-01-25 18:15 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC...
2004-01-26 19:20 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-26 20:06 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-26 20:53 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-27 14:46 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris
2004-01-27 16:36 Re: commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 18:38 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris
2004-01-28 12:04 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 14:49 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 18:17 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-30 06:39 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris

Eric Christopher

2004-01-08 04:31 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-10 06:47 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98
2004-01-10 20:25 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 20:26 Re: Richard Sandiford appointed MIPS maintainer
2004-01-11 06:58 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-13 23:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 02:55 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-17 00:55 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 22:08 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 19:49 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-19 19:57 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-19 21:18 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 06:37 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4
2004-01-25 05:41 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-26 22:59 bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-01-27 00:21 Re: bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-01-29 23:53 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c
2004-01-30 19:57 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression
2004-01-31 20:21 RE: multilib default dir.

Erik Schnetter

2004-01-04 21:48 tree-ssa branch on savannah
2004-01-25 14:06 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 17:15 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual

Erik Trulsson

2004-01-23 22:10 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 22:46 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 22:47 Re: mips address+symbol issue.

Falk Hueffner

2004-01-02 22:19 "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-03 22:17 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-06 22:44 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-06 23:26 Re: "generic" vectorization?

Felix Lee

2004-01-29 22:25 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host'

Florian Weimer

2004-01-17 13:47 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:53 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

Florian Weitling

2004-01-13 09:19 gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-14 12:31 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-15 17:46 Re: gcj and handling own packages question - now the files!
2004-01-15 17:48 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-22 06:42 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-26 17:35 Re: gcj and handling own packages question

Gabriel Dos Reis

2004-01-01 00:00 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction
2004-01-01 18:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:37 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 00:07 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 00:23 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 14:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 17:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:43 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 00:04 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 00:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 00:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 00:59 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 04:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 04:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 04:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 14:34 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 14:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 14:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 15:21 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 15:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 16:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 16:28 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 17:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 20:08 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 20:11 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 20:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 20:27 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-10 00:07 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-10 23:41 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 00:26 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-11 15:05 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64
2004-01-12 06:52 Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 08:40 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 09:06 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 14:09 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-13 00:54 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 01:19 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 01:33 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 00:26 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-17 02:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 23:17 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-19 01:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 04:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 08:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 09:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 15:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:58 Re: Compilation-time suggestion
2004-01-19 18:03 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:20 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:28 Re: g++ parser problem
2004-01-19 18:34 Re: g++ parser problem
2004-01-19 20:04 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-19 23:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 00:17 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 02:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 02:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 13:38 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 14:07 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 16:54 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-21 21:22 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-22 15:54 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-24 01:02 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch.
2004-01-25 14:36 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 16:41 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 18:29 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC...
2004-01-26 21:16 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-27 20:05 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:14 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 20:29 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 21:12 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 22:12 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 22:27 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 22:49 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 22:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 23:15 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 23:38 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 07:10 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 11:36 GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 14:20 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 16:25 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 16:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 17:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 20:11 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 20:36 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-31 10:08 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 10:22 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 10:33 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 19:20 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 19:28 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 19:38 gcc-3_3-branch frozen
2004-01-31 20:20 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 22:07 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 22:21 Re: why does dump_decl dump the scope of a FIELD_DECL?
2004-01-31 23:13 Re: Anonymous Namespaces

Gabriel Paubert

2004-01-13 08:57 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux

Gabriele Inghirami

2004-01-13 18:22 Successfully built gcc 3.3.2 on Pentium running Linux 2.4.24

Gagneet Singh

2004-01-09 09:38 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch.
2004-01-12 07:54 Porting to Windows

game

2004-01-14 13:45 Games

gccadmin

2004-01-05 17:14 gcc-ss-3.3-20040105 is now available
2004-01-07 17:02 gcc-ss-3.4-20040107 is now available
2004-01-12 17:14 gcc-ss-3.3-20040112 is now available
2004-01-14 17:13 gcc-ss-3.4-20040114 is now available
2004-01-19 17:09 gcc-ss-3.3-20040119 is now available
2004-01-21 17:07 gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 is now available
2004-01-21 18:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 is now available
2004-01-26 17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 is now available
2004-01-28 17:28 gcc-ss-3.4-20040128 is now available

Geert Bosch

2004-01-03 02:48 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-06 03:05 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-07 02:22 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-09 18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-12 01:15 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-19 17:42 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 18:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 03:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-22 03:39 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion?
2004-01-27 21:23 tree-ssa/13756 Documentation issues
2004-01-27 21:59 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Geoff Keating

2004-01-01 22:33 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction
2004-01-02 23:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:07 Re: Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFI frame support]
2004-01-02 23:18 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?
2004-01-03 04:29 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 21:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 01:37 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 06:15 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 08:15 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 11:12 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-04 19:42 Re: 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus
2004-01-04 20:11 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 20:08 Re: bump libgcc_s.so version number?
2004-01-08 00:40 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4
2004-01-08 04:50 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4
2004-01-12 23:42 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 20:21 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-13 21:31 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 00:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 01:10 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-19 01:12 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 01:18 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 21:34 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 22:17 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-19 22:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 22:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 22:13 Re: switch statement performance
2004-01-21 00:00 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch"
2004-01-21 00:07 Re: switch statement performance
2004-01-21 16:16 Re: Inlining function into itself (via transitivity
2004-01-23 19:40 Re: Fix for PR/13358
2004-01-23 20:58 Re: Fix for PR/13358
2004-01-26 09:06 Re: inlining between sections
2004-01-29 23:32 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines

Geoffrey Furnish

2004-01-22 14:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

Geoffrey Keating

2004-01-10 00:11 gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-10 00:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-12 18:39 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-12 18:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:42 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-14 01:14 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-14 21:26 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-14 22:14 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-15 04:31 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-20 18:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 18:52 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 22:30 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

Gerald Pfeifer

2004-01-02 08:58 Re: download of c compiler for Sun Solaris 8 O/S
2004-01-02 14:07 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
2004-01-04 11:34 autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-05 11:45 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98
2004-01-05 18:28 Re: [tree-ssa] merge to 2004-01-02 checked in
2004-01-05 21:44 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-08 16:08 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 21:56 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-09 12:19 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-10 23:11 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 21:21 Some updates on tree-ssa and PR8361
2004-01-13 09:33 Re: [www-patch] frontends.html (Was: Re: PL/1 Front-end for GCCv0.0.3)
2004-01-13 10:53 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-13 19:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-17 00:44 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 01:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 16:55 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 19:31 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-01-17 22:23 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-01-17 23:27 New tree-ssa bootstrap failure
2004-01-18 18:06 sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change
2004-01-18 20:20 Re: Broken Link On Front Page
2004-01-18 20:28 Re: Broken Link On Front Page
2004-01-18 22:22 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-18 22:41 Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-18 22:55 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-19 12:21 Re: gcc-3.3.2 freebsd 4.9 bug?
2004-01-19 19:41 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-19 19:46 fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-19 20:01 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources.
2004-01-19 21:06 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-20 18:49 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-20 23:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-21 15:05 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page
2004-01-21 18:08 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 is now available
2004-01-21 18:13 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page
2004-01-21 18:33 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040121
2004-01-21 18:52 DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks
2004-01-22 08:22 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks
2004-01-22 08:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-22 10:01 Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken Link OnFront Page)
2004-01-22 10:04 Re: gcc web site note
2004-01-23 10:24 ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-01-23 11:12 bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype
2004-01-23 14:32 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-23 18:22 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-23 18:52 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-24 10:16 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-26 19:46 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-31 08:29 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports?

Ghassan Shobaki

2004-01-03 16:57 Cross Compiler Build Fails due to an Object File !
2004-01-28 01:48 Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4
2004-01-29 07:08 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4

Gianluca Bosco

2004-01-22 14:50 [leadership/opensource] invitation to online survey

Giovanni Bajo

2004-01-01 19:13 [csl-arm-branch] Mainline merge policy?
2004-01-08 04:18 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-10 01:38 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 00:23 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 10:52 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 10:55 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 15:05 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 15:41 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 16:02 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-17 13:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 03:13 [new-ra] Development status?
2004-01-19 04:37 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:28 Re: g++ parser problem
2004-01-19 18:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 11:31 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-20 11:52 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-20 12:05 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 13:51 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 14:22 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 17:51 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-22 01:49 Re: An error message enhancement request
2004-01-22 13:12 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-22 15:21 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-23 19:50 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-24 01:39 Re: C++ extension not supported in 3.4.0 20040121 (prerelease)
2004-01-25 16:09 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 23:15 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 23:28 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-28 17:59 Re: g++ template function overload resolution failure(?)
2004-01-29 05:31 OpenBSD kernel testcases?
2004-01-31 20:41 why does dump_decl dump the scope of a FIELD_DECL?

Globalscreen

2004-01-15 01:52 RE:software

Graeme Peterson

2004-01-20 19:41 GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c

Greg Smith

2004-01-08 17:49 if/then/else hint ?

Gunther Nikl

2004-01-13 11:04 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 13:24 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 15:12 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 10:01 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 10:15 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 17:05 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-14 23:14 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

H. J. Lu

2004-01-09 00:03 Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran?
2004-01-09 21:24 Re: Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran?
2004-01-14 22:30 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.8 is released

Hans-Peter Nilsson

2004-01-01 03:30 Re: trouble with porting architecture
2004-01-04 12:26 cris-axis-elf on trunk broken; structure member assignments
2004-01-05 18:48 Re: Combined tree build broken?
2004-01-05 20:42 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

harpreet singh

2004-01-01 08:21 download of c compiler for Sun Solaris 8 O/S

Heiko Joerg Schick

2004-01-06 13:54 Re: gcc download

Helene Winter

2004-01-12 17:11 Warning!: (YOU WILL SUCCEED!) gzxlicrrqwyouid wsz

Henrik Sorensen

2004-01-08 18:45 PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.3

Hugo Gayosso

2004-01-09 08:07 Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: CVS on savannah

Ian Lance Taylor

2004-01-01 15:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 14:57 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 16:50 Re: CVS on savannah
2004-01-05 20:02 Re: Objective-C name (de)mangling
2004-01-09 13:56 Re: A linker problem
2004-01-12 00:39 Re: PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak.
2004-01-13 03:27 gcc/cp/cxxfilt.c
2004-01-13 14:36 Re: Register Coalescing
2004-01-15 17:53 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu
2004-01-18 08:37 Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 14:09 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 19:08 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level
2004-01-18 19:54 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 20:17 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 00:53 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 13:51 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-20 21:42 gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-20 23:18 Re: --with-libs busted?
2004-01-21 03:08 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-21 03:54 Re: switch statement performance
2004-01-22 01:26 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX
2004-01-22 01:43 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX
2004-01-23 18:30 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 19:44 Re: Unreviewed patches
2004-01-23 21:09 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 21:20 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 21:59 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-24 13:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin
2004-01-26 18:16 Change in order of compilation passes
2004-01-26 18:24 Re: Change in order of compilation passes
2004-01-27 14:40 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size
2004-01-27 18:24 Re: commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 18:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:09 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:31 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:55 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:58 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 21:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 19:25 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 21:41 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host'
2004-01-30 03:11 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 18:07 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 18:59 ARM condition code register handling
2004-01-30 21:49 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-31 00:53 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 01:38 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function

Ilya

2004-01-22 09:03 gcc web site note

Ivan Warren

2004-01-02 09:44 A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target

J. Grant

2004-01-01 13:01 Determine the target of a build in gcc

Jack Howarth

2004-01-13 14:07 g77 failures on Panther under fink

Jack Lloyd

2004-01-23 16:22 Fix for PR/13358
2004-01-23 20:09 Re: Fix for PR/13358

Jakub Jelinek

2004-01-12 08:39 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-18 23:34 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-20 13:09 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-21 09:34 RFC Decrease excessive string literal alignment on IA-32/AMD64
2004-01-22 17:00 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-22 17:59 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-23 14:37 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-23 15:33 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-27 16:41 Re: commits with multiple PRs

James Dessart

2004-01-08 03:20 Adding soft-registers (was: trouble with porting architecture)
2004-01-08 21:28 Re: Adding soft-registers
2004-01-08 23:09 Re: Adding soft-registers

Jamie Lokier

2004-01-08 18:05 Re: if/then/else hint ?
2004-01-22 03:37 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386

Jan Hoogerbrugge

2004-01-20 13:54 matching a call followed by a jump
2004-01-20 14:20 function name in labels
2004-01-21 15:33 Predicated execution / if-conversion?

Jan Hubicka

2004-01-03 18:10 Keeping builtins in non-gimple form?
2004-01-04 12:55 Re: small test case for memset problem
2004-01-06 16:21 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 18:48 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 20:41 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 21:16 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-07 00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-07 20:46 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 09:45 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 15:21 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 15:30 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 15:39 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 23:55 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-09 12:14 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-10 11:31 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 13:29 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64
2004-01-11 21:48 Please benchmark --param large-function-insns=3000 (Was Re: Some updates on tree-ssa and PR8361)
2004-01-12 01:20 Re: Please benchmark --param large-function-insns=3000 (Was Re: Some updates on tree-ssa and PR8361)
2004-01-13 00:22 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-13 00:37 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-13 00:45 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:49 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-13 01:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 19:57 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions
2004-01-14 01:03 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args
2004-01-14 22:20 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-14 23:15 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args
2004-01-17 13:53 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:44 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 15:07 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:20 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 21:48 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-17 22:12 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-18 16:45 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 22:22 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:33 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:48 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 23:27 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 11:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 12:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 13:18 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 13:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 13:39 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 14:18 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:58 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 19:39 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 00:31 tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-20 09:50 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-20 10:08 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 13:35 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 13:55 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 13:59 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 14:25 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-20 17:40 GGC per call allocation statistics
2004-01-20 18:32 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
2004-01-21 17:58 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
2004-01-22 15:52 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
2004-01-22 16:56 Re: Inline questions
2004-01-22 16:58 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-22 19:53 Tree-SSA versus 3.4 branch garbage production
2004-01-24 01:20 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-24 01:23 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-25 10:05 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-26 16:11 Re: My problem on x86-64
2004-01-26 19:05 Re: ia64-hpux crash in alias.c
2004-01-28 12:32 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4
2004-01-28 19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-29 10:14 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4
2004-01-29 22:58 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1
2004-01-29 23:23 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1
2004-01-30 14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-01-26
2004-01-31 11:34 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch
2004-01-31 11:36 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch
2004-01-31 11:45 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch
2004-01-31 21:22 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch

Jan-Benedict Glaw

2004-01-07 21:17 Re: embedding c code in assembly source
2004-01-11 21:21 VAX support (was: m68k bootstrapping broken)

Janis Johnson

2004-01-13 04:39 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o"

Jeff Sturm

2004-01-01 15:31 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 17:32 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 21:52 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 22:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 02:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-19 18:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 20:30 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-20 03:50 Re: libffi package

Jeffrey Creem

2004-01-16 16:41 Re: Snapshots v.s. CVS Head
2004-01-16 21:35 Re: Snapshots v.s. CVS Head

jfmaquine

2004-01-21 15:58 Could GCC interested in a faster STRSTR function ?

jgrant

2004-01-18 18:26 RE: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level
2004-01-18 19:31 RE: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level

Jim Blandy

2004-01-09 00:13 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function

Jim Wilson

2004-01-05 20:44 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered
2004-01-06 00:53 Re: How can I get the line number and file name from GCC tree.
2004-01-06 00:57 Re: insn "type" attribute
2004-01-06 01:05 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-06 01:27 Re: Can I generate debug info without relocations?
2004-01-06 01:42 Re: help :: virtual-incoming-args
2004-01-06 02:30 Re: Determine the target of a build in gcc
2004-01-06 02:33 Re: gcc 3.3.1 Superblock Scheduling
2004-01-06 02:35 Re: Installation Clarification
2004-01-06 02:43 Re: Combined tree build broken?
2004-01-06 04:57 Re: Bootstrap failure on sh-linux target (PR 13567)
2004-01-06 05:36 Re: Help with fixing weak aliases
2004-01-08 01:47 Re: embedding c code in assembly source
2004-01-08 02:03 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-08 02:08 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-09 20:12 Re: wanna add -march=c3 and -march=c3-2 support
2004-01-09 20:39 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-09 20:52 Re: 784 unexpected failures with g77-3.3 on HP-UX 11.11 (long)
2004-01-10 00:10 Re: Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran?
2004-01-10 05:38 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-12 21:07 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-13 01:08 Re: Question regarding mipsisa32r2 instruction set
2004-01-13 01:35 Re: offering a full implementation of C99 compound initializers traversal
2004-01-13 06:15 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-20 22:55 Re: TARGET_HARD_FLOAT for Single preciscion.
2004-01-20 23:07 Re: --with-libs busted?
2004-01-21 00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ia64
2004-01-21 00:30 Re: GCC XML back end
2004-01-21 00:30 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-21 00:32 Re: gcc
2004-01-21 00:34 Re: RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question
2004-01-21 01:03 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 01:55 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 03:24 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 07:24 Re: Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop
2004-01-21 18:20 Re: RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question
2004-01-21 18:47 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
2004-01-21 19:04 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion?
2004-01-21 19:44 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 21:13 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
2004-01-21 22:30 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
2004-01-22 04:19 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion?
2004-01-22 21:44 Re: gcc help
2004-01-23 22:00 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html a bit confusing w.r.t. Ada installation.
2004-01-27 02:12 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide
2004-01-27 02:19 Re: About embedding GCC, GCC compiling with Visual Studio...
2004-01-27 02:53 Re: (gcc-3.4.cvs) undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
2004-01-28 20:26 Re: SH4 regression testing
2004-01-29 20:50 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 20:33 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression

Jimen Ching

2004-01-20 22:27 g++ 3.3.1 (cygwin)

Joe Buck

2004-01-05 17:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-05 17:28 Re: When to emit C++ debug info?
2004-01-06 19:05 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-09 21:09 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-13 00:28 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 01:36 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 18:35 Re: Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS
2004-01-15 01:16 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 17:53 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE
2004-01-16 17:07 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-16 18:36 Re: compile-time type introspection
2004-01-19 23:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 23:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 23:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-21 01:27 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch"
2004-01-22 17:27 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks
2004-01-27 17:50 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 17:57 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris
2004-01-27 18:19 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:43 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-28 17:13 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 17:28 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 20:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 20:23 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 23:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-29 20:34 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-30 23:40 PR 13046: planned for 3.3.3?
2004-01-30 23:55 3.3.3 release notes [first draft]

Joel Sherrill

2004-01-29 19:31 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines

Joern Rennecke

2004-01-07 12:16 Re: calculate_global_regs_live
2004-01-07 17:53 Re: [SH4] splits after reload
2004-01-16 16:48 Re: trouble in attempt_auto_inc
2004-01-19 20:33 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-19 21:25 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-20 19:05 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-20 19:21 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-26 19:42 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-26 20:39 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-27 17:00 ChangeLog as cvs check-in message
2004-01-27 17:34 Re: "return" RTL template
2004-01-27 20:08 ! HAVE_foo, ! (flags & BIT)
2004-01-28 16:36 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 14:22 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-29 14:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-29 18:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-29 18:45 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 12:37 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 13:32 libstdc++-v3 build failure
2004-01-30 14:24 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register

John David Anglin

2004-01-05 03:08 autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux*
2004-01-05 04:24 Re: autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux*
2004-01-05 05:07 re: Cross Compiler Build Fails due to an Object File !
2004-01-06 00:43 Re: autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux*

John R. Shannon

2004-01-17 12:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:56 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-21 18:24 gcc-ss-3.4-20040121

Jon Beniston

2004-01-13 10:26 Register Coalescing

Jonathan Lennox

2004-01-02 18:44 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 20:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc

Jonathan Wilson

2004-01-30 00:23 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-30 00:29 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32

Josef Zlomek

2004-01-06 14:49 GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-06 15:27 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-06 16:33 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function
2004-01-21 14:11 Inlining function into itself (via transitivity
2004-01-21 18:10 Re: Inlining function into itself (via transitivity
2004-01-22 14:53 Re: mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code

Joseph S. Myers

2004-01-01 11:24 malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 01:39 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 11:21 RE: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 16:23 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 16:30 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 16:42 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 16:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:02 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 10:57 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 11:05 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 22:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 20:07 Re: 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus
2004-01-04 20:16 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-05 00:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 21:33 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 00:50 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 01:10 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-07 00:55 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-07 13:49 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-07 21:37 Re: libffi automake question
2004-01-08 10:54 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-17 01:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 11:09 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-01-17 11:16 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 11:20 Re: Regenerating gcc.pot
2004-01-17 17:07 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 18:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 18:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 18:11 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:00 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-01-18 11:30 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 21:14 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:42 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 23:07 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-19 10:54 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-22 01:26 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX
2004-01-23 20:07 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch.
2004-01-23 20:22 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-01-31 07:34 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 23:31 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c]

Kai Henningsen

2004-01-03 21:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 21:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 21:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 22:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 22:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 22:12 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 22:12 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 19:35 Objective-C name (de)mangling
2004-01-05 19:38 Objective-C name (de)mangling
2004-01-05 19:38 Re: New GCC extension hint

Karel Gardas

2004-01-19 19:43 GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources.
2004-01-19 19:53 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources.
2004-01-19 20:06 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources.
2004-01-20 07:40 Re: gcc compilation speed
2004-01-20 08:25 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 09:20 [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-20 09:52 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-20 14:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 14:55 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 15:21 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 16:16 Comparison of compilation speed of GCC 3.4.0 040114, ICC 8.0 andCOMO 4.3.3 on MICO ORB core sources (C++)
2004-01-20 16:51 GCC 3.4.0 040114/GCC 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 compilation speed comparison.
2004-01-20 17:16 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040114/GCC 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 compilation speedcomparison.
2004-01-20 18:47 Bugreports from MICO compile-time testing submited [was: Re: [UPDATED]GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICOproject sources.]
2004-01-21 10:22 GCC3.4.0/profiled bootstrap compile-time testing on MICO's ORB coresources
2004-01-22 23:04 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html a bit confusing w.r.t.Ada installation.
2004-01-26 18:55 Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126as a bootstrap compiler
2004-01-27 14:06 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when usinggcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler
2004-01-28 07:30 re: SH4 regression testing
2004-01-28 09:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 12:11 Re: g++ template function overload resolution failure(?)
2004-01-28 13:57 How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)
2004-01-28 14:45 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)
2004-01-28 15:39 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)
2004-01-28 16:03 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?)
2004-01-29 11:27 GCC 3.4.0 040128 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison onMICO project sources.
2004-01-29 14:54 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040128 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources.

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2004-01-02 16:27 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:54 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 03:23 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 03:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 05:03 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 01:02 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 03:10 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 18:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 19:19 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 02:08 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-06 13:46 New configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.7
2004-01-10 13:56 Richard Sandiford appointed MIPS maintainer
2004-01-17 01:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 02:17 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 13:58 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-20 01:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-22 02:41 Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ???
2004-01-22 13:41 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ???
2004-01-22 13:49 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ???
2004-01-23 13:42 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype
2004-01-23 14:28 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype

kaz Kojima

2004-01-05 05:25 Re: Right way to add testcase that contains shared library?
2004-01-05 06:12 Bootstrap failure on sh-linux target (PR 13567)
2004-01-06 07:17 Re: Bootstrap failure on sh-linux target (PR 13567)
2004-01-29 00:39 Re: SH4 regression testing

Kazu Hirata

2004-01-05 04:49 Re: New GCC extension hint
2004-01-17 18:43 Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-18 15:48 Migration to target hooks
2004-01-18 22:52 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-19 05:31 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI
2004-01-22 03:15 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ???
2004-01-24 09:09 When are we going to remove deprecated ports?
2004-01-27 08:02 Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size
2004-01-27 19:44 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size
2004-01-28 05:57 Re: Help needed on "insn does not satisfy its constraints"
2004-01-29 01:18 When exactly does a type have a variable length?
2004-01-29 04:18 Removing cut-n-paste comments about target macros/hooks.

Kean Johnston

2004-01-10 20:21 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4

Kelley Cook

2004-01-07 20:40 libffi automake question
2004-01-08 20:06 Re: if/then/else hint ?
2004-01-12 14:38 Re: [Makefile] PR bootstrap/12744 Allow release tarballs to build without bison/flex/makeinfo
2004-01-20 18:04 Re: -mfpmath=sse question
2004-01-20 20:25 Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS
2004-01-21 14:20 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page
2004-01-21 16:47 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page
2004-01-21 17:16 [withdrawn] Re: Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS
2004-01-23 17:58 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages

Kevin Atkinson

2004-01-31 09:37 Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 10:05 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 10:27 Re: Anonymous Namespaces

Kevin B . Hendricks

2004-01-30 19:18 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin

Kevin B. Hendricks

2004-01-30 21:40 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin

Kumar Gala

2004-01-07 21:36 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction

Lally Singh

2004-01-16 17:20 compile-time type introspection

Lars Segerlund

2004-01-19 14:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-27 15:42 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Laurent GUERBY

2004-01-10 11:45 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-12 12:06 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-12 19:32 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-14 08:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 08:39 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 20:59 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 12:19 Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa tomainline)
2004-01-19 18:35 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa tomainline)
2004-01-19 22:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 22:22 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa tomainline)
2004-01-19 23:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 08:12 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re:gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]
2004-01-20 12:07 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-27 20:39 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-30 11:32 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month
2004-01-30 19:17 Ada runtime build backend ICE on x86-linux on HEAD
2004-01-31 08:43 Re: Ada runtime build backend ICE on x86-linux on HEAD

law

2004-01-05 17:59 Re: [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes
2004-01-05 18:07 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa)
2004-01-05 18:39 Re: [tree-ssa] merge to 2004-01-02 checked in
2004-01-06 05:15 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? (tentative patch)
2004-01-06 05:29 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 05:42 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 05:55 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables
2004-01-06 06:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA
2004-01-06 07:21 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues
2004-01-06 17:37 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 19:14 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 19:40 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 23:42 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-07 00:30 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-07 08:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Removing CALL_PLACEHOLDER mess, when?
2004-01-08 19:16 Re: What happened to the PPro DFA scheduler description?
2004-01-09 06:37 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-15 18:46 Re: [tree-ssa] moving phi nodes?
2004-01-16 17:30 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-17 00:53 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 00:54 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 06:13 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 06:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 21:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 21:24 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 07:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 07:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 15:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 15:56 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 22:18 Your change causing regressions
2004-01-20 15:08 Re: matching a call followed by a jump
2004-01-21 05:15 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-21 06:30 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-21 07:48 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-22 00:21 Re: tree-ssa and compile-time performance regressions
2004-01-27 15:00 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size
2004-01-27 19:13 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 18:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 18:33 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Leeanna Bouchard

2004-01-16 03:23 re [14]

Marc Espie

2004-01-02 16:51 Re: where are char_traits<wchar_t> instances built ?
2004-01-04 18:12 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus
2004-01-12 23:50 RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-13 11:11 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-16 02:17 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-19 01:31 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 03:42 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 13:28 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 16:24 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:34 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 19:10 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 19:15 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 22:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 07:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 10:04 A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 13:59 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 22:01 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-25 00:57 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-25 01:01 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual

Marcel Cox

2004-01-27 08:10 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-28 20:27 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32

Marcel Weiher

2004-01-21 23:33 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-21 23:37 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

Mark Hahn

2004-01-19 23:53 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

Mark Kettenis

2004-01-01 19:38 Re: Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFI frame support]
2004-01-11 12:37 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64

Mark Mitchell

2004-01-06 01:22 GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-06 07:08 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-12 05:21 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 05:37 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctlyon AMD64
2004-01-12 16:18 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 16:24 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-12 18:19 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-12 19:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-12 23:31 Re: [www-patch] bugs/management.html: Clarify how to handleregressions
2004-01-12 23:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 01:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 01:12 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-13 01:26 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 05:18 Re: swap does not compile
2004-01-14 06:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 16:47 Re: Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS
2004-01-15 01:15 Re: Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS
2004-01-17 02:58 GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created
2004-01-17 03:18 Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-01-17 04:02 Regenerating gcc.pot
2004-01-17 18:01 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created
2004-01-17 18:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 18:34 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 19:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 07:23 Re: Testable pooma
2004-01-18 22:37 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-01-20 02:08 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-22 16:18 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-22 17:00 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-24 02:18 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-26 19:34 GCC Release Status (2004-01-26)
2004-01-28 03:26 Re: case ranges in C++ (extension)
2004-01-29 22:50 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1
2004-01-29 23:12 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1
2004-01-30 01:20 Re: Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken LinkOn Front Page)
2004-01-30 22:53 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports?
2004-01-30 23:15 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-30 23:18 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-30 23:25 Merging tree-ssa into mainline
2004-01-31 02:03 --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4?
2004-01-31 03:23 Re: --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4?
2004-01-31 04:22 covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch
2004-01-31 20:18 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports?

Markus Hitter

2004-01-21 08:47 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

Matt Austern

2004-01-13 00:59 Altivec (Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal)
2004-01-20 06:27 gcc compilation speed
2004-01-24 08:05 Bootstrap failure on Darwin
2004-01-27 17:26 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 20:13 Doxygen (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-01-27 22:43 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 23:14 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 06:13 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-29 16:08 [Darwin] Patch: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-01-30 16:36 [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-01-30 21:01 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-01-31 01:07 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin

Matt Thomas

2004-01-11 18:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

Matthias Benkmann

2004-01-20 00:01 GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc3.5 integration branch proposal]

Matthias Klose

2004-01-15 13:49 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 14:12 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-18 09:59 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-01-23 20:05 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-01-23 20:35 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-01-28 20:11 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status

Michael Eager

2004-01-22 02:09 MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4
2004-01-22 20:07 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4
2004-01-24 01:15 GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

2004-01-10 14:27 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 00:06 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 11:44 Re: Release Criteria (Was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-13 23:31 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-15 08:06 bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, Boolean.java

Michael Matz

2004-01-19 09:58 Re: [new-ra] Development status?
2004-01-20 16:48 Re: [new-ra] Development status?
2004-01-21 13:58 Re: [new-ra] Development status?
2004-01-23 14:21 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-23 15:23 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken
2004-01-23 21:48 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra?
2004-01-26 15:45 Re: My problem on x86-64
2004-01-27 16:58 case ranges in C++ (extension)
2004-01-29 15:04 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-30 13:35 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c]

Michel Lespinasse

2004-01-23 22:28 Re: mips address+symbol issue.

Michelle

2004-01-14 05:04 GCC configuration help, please?

Mike Stump

2004-01-05 22:03 Re: Current status of Objective-C++
2004-01-10 08:27 Re: How to Online Compiler Using GCC
2004-01-12 22:40 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 23:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 19:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 20:50 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md?
2004-01-16 20:18 Re: Query for removing file support from Newlib
2004-01-20 02:05 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 02:14 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 03:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 20:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 21:38 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]
2004-01-20 22:36 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 22:59 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-21 19:14 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-28 20:25 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-31 03:59 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 07:02 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function

Mile Davidovic

2004-01-12 15:21 Request for information
2004-01-12 15:32 Question regarding mipsisa32r2 instruction set

Mircea Namolaru

2004-01-25 16:40 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-29 11:44 Re: New loop unroller broken?

Mohammed Abdul Sami

2004-01-12 10:41 problem installing gcc

Momchil Velikov

2004-01-21 10:07 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch"

Nageshwara rao M

2004-01-02 09:35 Installation Clarification

Nathan Sidwell

2004-01-06 09:29 Re: [csl-arm-branch] Mainline merge policy?
2004-01-07 10:21 value of __cplusplus
2004-01-12 09:04 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual

Nathanael Nerode

2004-01-03 04:05 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 21:25 XPASSes: testcases fixed?
2004-01-05 03:30 Re: autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux*
2004-01-06 21:30 Re: New configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.7
2004-01-10 01:27 Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 01:34 Bugzilla: bootstrap should not be a component
2004-01-10 22:09 Re: Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-13 21:25 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-13 22:15 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-14 18:09 Re: ./ diff config
2004-01-20 20:09 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view
2004-01-20 20:39 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-20 20:42 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-20 20:50 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9
2004-01-20 21:04 Re: Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS

Neal D. Becker

2004-01-20 17:35 -mfpmath=sse question

negimoto

2004-01-19 05:29 I have built gcc 3.3.2(C,C++) on AIX 4.3.3.0

neil

2004-01-06 22:16 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-07 06:48 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-10 09:06 Re: value of __cplusplus
2004-01-13 07:13 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x

Neil Booth

2004-01-28 07:09 Re: about the interfaces of a front end

Nick Burrett

2004-01-19 10:40 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

Nithya Babu

2004-01-08 09:28 GCC porting problem help

Nitin Gupta

2004-01-23 15:07 Verbose compiling of multiple files.

Olivier Galibert

2004-01-03 07:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 07:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-27 17:40 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?

Olivier Hainque

2004-01-21 14:27 STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ?
2004-01-22 09:49 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ?
2004-01-22 11:31 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ?

Oscar Fuentes

2004-01-30 17:29 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-31 19:53 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32

pankaj dev

2004-01-16 12:23 Query for removing file support from Newlib

Paolo Carlini

2004-01-04 20:06 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-18 10:23 Oopack.C: mainline vs tree-ssa
2004-01-19 18:18 Re: g++ parser problem
2004-01-19 18:25 Re: g++ parser problem
2004-01-22 12:33 Re: fstream behaviour error / wrong installation ?
2004-01-23 13:46 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype
2004-01-23 16:13 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype
2004-01-27 17:51 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 20:34 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 21:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 22:27 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 22:34 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 23:03 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-27 23:22 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?

Pascal J . Bourguignon

2004-01-21 16:54 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

Paul Brook

2004-01-05 12:21 Re: %0 and match_dup in .md
2004-01-17 14:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:36 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-29 11:52 Re: linking c code against fortran libraries

Paul Cadaret

2004-01-07 20:43 embedding c code in assembly source

Paul Carpenter

2004-01-27 14:35 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size

Paul Eggert

2004-01-06 00:12 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 09:24 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -

Paul Fisher

2004-01-09 07:44 Re: CVS on savannah

Paul Jarc

2004-01-05 21:52 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 01:56 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-21 07:10 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch"
2004-01-21 14:35 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch"
2004-01-21 20:52 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa

Paul Koning

2004-01-08 18:22 Re: if/then/else hint ?
2004-01-13 23:24 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 14:58 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 16:24 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:30 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 15:08 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-29 20:03 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines

Paul Vixie

2004-01-20 02:19 switch statement performance
2004-01-20 22:26 Re: switch statement performance
2004-01-21 00:29 Re: switch statement performance
2004-01-21 04:13 Re: switch statement performance

Per Bothner

2004-01-17 05:52 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 16:26 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 22:06 Re: function name in labels
2004-01-26 18:52 compile speed [was: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]

perugupa

2004-01-27 20:34 how to compile gcc with profiling on..

Petar Penchev

2004-01-27 08:53 "return" RTL template

Peter Barada

2004-01-06 15:59 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-06 21:48 Re: FP consistency and -O2
2004-01-07 00:26 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 00:50 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 03:25 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 14:37 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 14:38 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-21 06:32 Improvements for ColdFire v4

Phil Edwards

2004-01-01 00:19 Re: Request for help performing CVS branch trick
2004-01-06 05:56 Re: references to compilation library in libstdc.la
2004-01-08 16:08 Re: g++ invokes cc1plus on *.c files
2004-01-10 00:25 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-10 15:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-10 15:52 Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-12 15:39 Re: problem installing gcc
2004-01-12 21:12 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-14 16:18 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-18 01:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-23 17:33 Re: Verbose compiling of multiple files.
2004-01-23 20:18 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-01-26 21:18 Is Banshee required for tree-ssa?
2004-01-27 17:48 Re: ChangeLog as cvs check-in message
2004-01-27 19:31 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:10 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:15 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 21:24 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 21:48 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-28 17:53 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 17:59 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 20:29 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-31 03:18 Re: --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4?

Pranay Chandrashekhar Tembhekar

2004-01-21 06:10 binutils for irix 6.5 17M

Qiong Cai

2004-01-13 11:30 Number of functions optimized by GCSE module

Rainer Orth

2004-01-09 16:25 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing
2004-01-12 11:47 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-12 16:04 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)

Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida

2004-01-02 09:00 [SH4] splits after reload
2004-01-07 08:03 [ping] [SH4]splits after reload
2004-01-08 09:48 Re: [SH4] splits after reload

Ralf Baechle

2004-01-25 18:26 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2
2004-01-26 08:37 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2

Ralf Corsepius

2004-01-29 11:51 preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 18:23 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines

Ranjit Mathew

2004-01-06 05:02 Re: fastjar question
2004-01-06 05:07 Re: fastjar question
2004-01-12 09:53 Re: Porting to Windows
2004-01-13 06:44 [www-patch] frontends.html (Was: Re: PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.3)
2004-01-13 12:28 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-16 05:00 Re: gcj and handling own packages question

Rens Sankar

2004-01-07 06:13 less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-09 12:38 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-13 04:58 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64
2004-01-14 05:05 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64

Richard Earnshaw

2004-01-08 18:00 Re: if/then/else hint ?
2004-01-08 18:27 Re: if/then/else hint ?
2004-01-21 11:57 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 10:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-27 14:14 commits with multiple PRs
2004-01-27 15:48 Re: commits with multiple PRs

Richard Guenther

2004-01-08 14:53 tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 15:19 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 15:34 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 15:39 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:07 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-08 16:13 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-09 09:16 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-09 10:12 Strange error with current HEAD
2004-01-09 10:29 Re: Strange error with current HEAD
2004-01-09 14:04 State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-10 13:29 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-10 13:30 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-10 17:20 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-12 10:15 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-14 12:17 g++ 3.4 breakage
2004-01-17 19:34 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 22:00 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-17 22:24 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-18 16:36 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ia64
2004-01-19 12:01 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-20 09:55 profiledbootstrap success!
2004-01-20 12:42 Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 13:01 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 14:59 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 15:29 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 16:59 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 19:24 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-20 20:00 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-20 21:55 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-20 22:52 Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
2004-01-21 10:31 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
2004-01-21 21:54 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
2004-01-22 10:38 RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-22 13:24 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node?
2004-01-22 20:00 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-27 10:01 New performance measurements
2004-01-28 12:06 g++ template function overload resolution failure(?)
2004-01-28 20:22 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status
2004-01-28 22:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status

Richard Henderson

2004-01-03 00:19 Re: "generic" vectorization?
2004-01-03 23:08 [tree-ssa] merge to 2004-01-02 checked in
2004-01-05 05:58 [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements
2004-01-05 06:15 Re: [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements
2004-01-06 06:27 Re: bump libgcc_s.so version number?
2004-01-06 06:35 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-06 19:08 Re: [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms
2004-01-07 21:03 Re: Recog/asm_operands problem with MIPS/gcc3.3
2004-01-09 22:31 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
2004-01-11 01:35 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 14:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-12 00:37 Re: PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak.
2004-01-12 00:50 Re: PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak.
2004-01-13 04:46 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions
2004-01-14 19:56 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md?
2004-01-14 22:24 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-15 06:22 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 23:04 Re: libgcc linking oddity
2004-01-16 01:36 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-17 21:32 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 22:41 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-17 23:37 Re: New tree-ssa bootstrap failure
2004-01-18 19:01 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-18 20:10 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:05 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:29 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-18 22:36 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:37 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 12:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 20:02 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 20:41 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-19 20:41 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 21:38 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-19 22:40 Re: Your change causing regressions
2004-01-20 00:59 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-20 01:57 Re: Your change causing regressions
2004-01-20 10:21 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-20 17:17 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-20 18:15 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
2004-01-21 00:20 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
2004-01-21 00:28 Re: Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS
2004-01-21 00:47 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-21 07:44 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-21 18:05 Re: RFC Decrease excessive string literal alignment on IA-32/AMD64
2004-01-21 18:16 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ?
2004-01-21 18:39 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion?
2004-01-22 19:27 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-22 19:33 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ?
2004-01-22 20:51 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos?
2004-01-24 09:30 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin
2004-01-27 19:20 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris
2004-01-29 01:50 Re: When exactly does a type have a variable length?
2004-01-29 18:19 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-29 19:05 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register
2004-01-30 00:16 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things?
2004-01-30 00:19 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status
2004-01-30 00:45 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things?
2004-01-31 00:01 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin

Richard Kenner

2004-01-03 16:08 Problem with reg-stack.c on x86-64
2004-01-12 13:02 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4)
2004-01-14 13:11 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-15 03:58 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-16 12:00 Problem with zlib on x86-64
2004-01-17 02:28 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 02:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 02:52 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 02:56 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:21 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 13:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 13:29 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 13:33 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 13:35 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 13:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 20:42 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-19 11:44 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 11:51 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 12:24 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 12:29 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 14:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 14:17 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 15:05 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 16:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 18:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 18:18 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 19:05 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 19:13 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 21:25 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 23:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 23:40 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 23:42 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 23:48 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-20 04:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 11:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 12:36 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-23 00:12 I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 03:40 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 12:57 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-23 13:13 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-24 02:29 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64
2004-01-26 12:41 My problem on x86-64
2004-01-27 15:22 "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 15:48 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 17:59 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:04 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:06 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:48 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 18:53 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:25 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:43 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:53 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 19:59 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:11 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 20:42 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-28 18:08 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-29 19:04 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-29 20:37 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Richard Sandiford

2004-01-08 08:06 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05)
2004-01-09 10:23 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch.
2004-01-20 09:30 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-22 09:39 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-22 11:22 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4
2004-01-22 11:29 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4
2004-01-24 11:43 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-24 22:42 Re: mips address+symbol issue.

Richard Zidlicky

2004-01-05 00:20 m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-05 13:20 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-05 16:08 bump libgcc_s.so version number?
2004-01-06 09:24 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-06 22:18 libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-06 22:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-07 18:40 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 09:32 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-08 18:26 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-08 23:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-09 00:48 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-09 23:23 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-10 23:33 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-11 11:07 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 11:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-11 14:59 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 00:18 Re: bump libgcc_s.so version number?
2004-01-13 00:21 Re: libstdc++/configure problem
2004-01-13 02:19 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 17:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 22:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-13 23:00 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 00:00 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 00:29 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 11:06 libgcc linking oddity
2004-01-15 12:32 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 13:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 16:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-15 19:36 trouble in attempt_auto_inc
2004-01-16 03:34 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-01-16 04:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

Robert Dewar

2004-01-01 23:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-01 23:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 00:14 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 00:16 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 00:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 05:08 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 11:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 22:15 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 22:28 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 22:39 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 02:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 02:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 03:08 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 04:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 14:31 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 15:09 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 16:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 16:02 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 00:36 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 17:13 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 00:37 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 00:42 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 18:26 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98
2004-01-16 03:29 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-16 10:15 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-17 02:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 12:07 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 13:55 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 14:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 14:16 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 14:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 17:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:54 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:27 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 19:06 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 20:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 21:20 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 03:45 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 03:53 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 04:35 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-22 00:08 Re: Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop
2004-01-22 15:32 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos?
2004-01-23 21:44 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-23 22:26 Re: mips address+symbol issue.
2004-01-28 22:23 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 22:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 23:59 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-29 00:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-30 16:53 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-30 22:52 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-01-31 23:47 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-31 23:50 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-31 23:52 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Robert McNulty Junior

2004-01-19 03:47 RE: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

Robert Schiele

2004-01-14 08:38 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu
2004-01-16 14:32 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu
2004-01-16 16:01 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu

Robert Schweikert

2004-01-19 18:07 g++ parser problem
2004-01-19 19:39 latest snapshot does not build on x86_64

Roger Sayle

2004-01-06 17:10 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-06 21:17 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-09 14:50 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this?
2004-01-17 05:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 06:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:29 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 18:05 Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
2004-01-18 20:38 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change
2004-01-19 17:46 Compilation-time suggestion
2004-01-19 17:58 Compilation-time suggestion #2

Ross Smith

2004-01-04 00:20 Re: malloc attributes and realloc

rthorpe

2004-01-28 14:19 Use of automatically generated docs (Doxygen) experience from another project

Rudy Gevaert

2004-01-04 20:17 CVS on savannah
2004-01-07 21:12 Re: CVS on savannah

Russ Allbery

2004-01-02 19:21 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 19:26 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-16 05:18 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x
2004-01-20 10:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

S. Bosscher

2004-01-03 13:12 RE: [Bug target/13547] [3.4 Regression] avr port does not build
2004-01-12 15:18 RE: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 15:21 RE: Classifying bugs
2004-01-15 14:15 RE: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE
2004-01-28 13:20 RE: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4

sandeep . rm

2004-01-09 12:11 A linker problem

Sanjiv Gupta

2004-01-05 17:28 Building gcc for SunOS5.6
2004-01-06 04:22 RE: Building gcc for SunOS5.6
2004-01-07 11:10 RE: Building gcc for SunOS5.6
2004-01-09 06:41 RE: [ECOS] Will gcc3.3 will work with eCos?.
2004-01-21 06:39 RE: binutils for irix 6.5 17M
2004-01-21 12:12 RE: binutils for irix 6.5 17M
2004-01-31 07:45 multilib default dir.
2004-01-31 11:01 RE: multilib default dir.
2004-01-31 11:12 RE: multilib default dir.

Scott A Crosby

2004-01-18 02:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

Scott Robert Ladd

2004-01-17 14:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:49 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:54 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 15:28 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:16 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:50 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:58 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:02 povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 20:18 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 20:21 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-17 21:34 povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-19 16:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 17:07 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:08 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:08 Re: Compilation-time suggestion #2
2004-01-19 18:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:12 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 14:25 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 14:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 15:19 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

Segher Boessenkool

2004-01-21 14:56 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-21 14:56 Re: Compilation-time suggestion #2
2004-01-22 06:26 Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-22 06:27 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386
2004-01-22 06:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 06:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 06:27 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks
2004-01-22 06:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-22 08:30 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks
2004-01-22 08:49 Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0

Serge Belyshev

2004-01-22 14:14 mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code
2004-01-22 23:53 Re: mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code

Shalom Berman

2004-01-06 13:42 gcc download
2004-01-06 13:42 gcc download
2004-01-06 13:42 Recall: gcc download

shawn.starr

2004-01-05 20:18 Building binutils/gcc/glibc - (Was NPTL bind 9.2.3 issue)

Shelly Adhikari

2004-01-24 01:10 C++ extension not supported in 3.4.0 20040121 (prerelease)

Shinpei Kato

2004-01-30 03:52 About "symbol_ref" expression
2004-01-30 07:04 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression

Sidney Bennett

2004-01-08 19:05 SSA for Trees - PRE implementation
2004-01-08 19:44 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation

Sidney Page Bennett

2004-01-09 03:35 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation

Simon G Best

2004-01-27 13:14 C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 06:08 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-28 12:52 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-01-29 23:51 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?

SingleReel News

2004-01-15 23:45 SingleReel.com Streaming Host
2004-01-16 00:29 SingleReel.com Streaming Host

Spundun Bhatt

2004-01-15 01:01 TARGET_HARD_FLOAT for Single preciscion.

Stephan T. Lavavej

2004-01-05 18:03 RE: C compiler for Win 95/98
2004-01-10 06:14 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98
2004-01-18 09:23 Broken Link On Front Page
2004-01-19 17:34 Buglets In http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

Stephane Carrez

2004-01-08 20:00 Re: Adding soft-registers
2004-01-08 21:56 Re: Adding soft-registers
2004-01-08 22:05 Re: Adding soft-registers

Stephane MILLET

2004-01-22 08:50 fstream behaviour error / wrong installation ?

Stephen Ma

2004-01-08 06:28 g++ invokes cc1plus on *.c files

steve naroff

2004-01-21 14:58 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-21 17:36 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++

Steven Bosscher

2004-01-04 11:37 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-06 06:49 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-10 01:40 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 11:25 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 11:54 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 13:38 Re: State of gcc 3.3
2004-01-10 14:40 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 20:28 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-10 23:35 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-11 22:23 PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak.
2004-01-12 08:31 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 09:07 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 09:11 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-13 00:15 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:37 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-14 01:43 Re: 3.5 integration branch created
2004-01-14 08:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-15 12:57 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE
2004-01-15 13:03 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE
2004-01-16 09:30 Re: [Bug optimization/13629] [tree-ssa][Regression] dominator optimizations can pessimize code
2004-01-17 02:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 02:19 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 03:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 14:05 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 17:31 RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-17 20:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 20:21 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 21:33 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 22:55 cfg.texi (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline)
2004-01-17 22:58 Re: cfg.texi (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline)
2004-01-17 23:27 Testable pooma
2004-01-18 11:22 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-19 08:12 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 08:19 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 08:45 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 10:43 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-20 07:23 Re: gcc compilation speed
2004-01-20 09:48 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources.
2004-01-20 11:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 15:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-20 15:16 Re: function name in labels
2004-01-20 17:02 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040114/GCC 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 compilation speed comparison.
2004-01-20 20:38 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-20 23:08 Re: povray: Revised numbers
2004-01-26 19:17 Re: Change in order of compilation passes

Stuart Hastings

2004-01-14 00:55 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args
2004-01-14 22:52 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args

Stuart Reynolds

2004-01-06 20:09 FP consistency and -O2

Svein E. Seldal

2004-01-22 08:51 [RFC] Multiple memory-spaces in GCC feature request

Swaminathan Venkatakrishnaprasad

2004-01-20 23:42 Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop

Syd Polk

2004-01-14 18:53 Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md?
2004-01-29 18:56 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 19:26 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 20:59 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-31 00:47 Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 00:58 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 01:20 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 01:21 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 01:52 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 02:19 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-01-31 02:20 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function

Theodore Papadopoulo

2004-01-19 13:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-19 19:04 A bug ??

Thiemo Seufer

2004-01-24 12:44 Re: mips address+symbol issue.

Thomas Heller

2004-01-16 20:17 libffi package
2004-01-20 20:08 Re: libffi package
2004-01-22 15:07 Re: libffi package
2004-01-22 19:12 Re: libffi package
2004-01-27 17:16 Re: libffi package

Timothy J. Wood

2004-01-18 04:39 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 19:27 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 19:31 <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 23:51 Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0

tm_gccmail

2004-01-05 20:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-05 21:09 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-08 21:41 Re: Adding soft-registers
2004-01-08 23:06 Re: Adding soft-registers
2004-01-19 23:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-21 21:38 Re: switch statement performance
2004-01-30 23:51 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32

Tminter

2004-01-31 14:51 My last weekend become

Tom Tromey

2004-01-05 21:33 Re: fastjar question
2004-01-13 18:39 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-18 23:26 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails
2004-01-19 18:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-21 00:20 Re: libffi package
2004-01-22 17:34 Re: libffi package
2004-01-26 15:45 Re: libffi package
2004-01-26 15:55 Re: gcj and handling own packages question
2004-01-27 22:31 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Ton Hospel

2004-01-06 03:51 references to compilation library in libstdc.la

Toon Moene

2004-01-06 23:04 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-09 20:24 Re: Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran?
2004-01-17 23:33 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-17 23:38 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 00:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 22:56 Re: Broken Link On Front Page
2004-01-20 22:50 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re:gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal]

Ulrich Weigand

2004-01-22 18:47 New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 20:06 Re: New loop unroller broken?

V Alex Brennen

2004-01-08 16:30 Successfull build of gcc 3.3.2 under AIX 5.1

Vaclav Haisman

2004-01-13 23:58 Regression testers and --enable-intermodule

Victor Leo Kallen Soto

2004-01-16 17:30 succesful bootstrap: 3.3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.8

Viktor Przebinda

2004-01-12 20:56 parallel code generation

Vimal Kumar

2004-01-05 12:06 %0 and match_dup in .md

Vladimir Makarov

2004-01-19 14:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 15:34 Re: GCC on SPEC.org

Volker Reichelt

2004-01-12 15:33 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 23:10 [www-patch] bugs/management.html: Clarify how to handle regressions
2004-01-14 11:01 Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS
2004-01-16 23:44 [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup
2004-01-17 23:13 Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup
2004-01-23 17:01 Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch.

wmglo

2004-01-01 18:04 Re: malloc attributes and realloc

Wolfgang Bangerth

2004-01-12 14:48 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4
2004-01-12 14:57 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 15:08 Re: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 15:24 RE: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-12 15:28 RE: Classifying bugs
2004-01-12 15:37 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-20 19:48 Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 20:16 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 20:46 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-21 21:30 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-22 17:23 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-01-23 16:51 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa

Xue_Pengyu

2004-01-31 08:12 About different compile address

xyzzy

2004-01-20 12:28 RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question
2004-01-21 15:29 Re: RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question

Zack Weinberg

2004-01-02 19:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 22:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 22:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-02 23:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 04:17 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-03 19:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc
2004-01-04 19:54 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD
2004-01-05 21:20 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 00:54 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 00:57 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 01:07 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 01:19 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 01:53 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-06 02:19 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-06 02:42 Re: EOF character in parser
2004-01-06 10:40 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc -
2004-01-10 07:07 va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-12 20:48 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-12 23:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:27 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux
2004-01-13 03:34 Re: gcc/cp/cxxfilt.c
2004-01-14 07:13 Re: GCC configuration help, please?
2004-01-18 02:34 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
2004-01-18 03:15 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 04:37 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1
2004-01-18 09:03 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-18 22:25 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 03:59 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-19 18:03 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 18:26 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 21:15 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 23:36 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-19 23:46 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
2004-01-20 03:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 18:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-20 19:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-21 02:05 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-21 06:41 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web pageexplicitly. Also a GCC source mirror?
2004-01-21 11:12 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political pointof view
2004-01-23 18:17 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype
2004-01-23 18:34 Re: Fix for PR/13358
2004-01-23 21:24 Re: @D not replaced
2004-01-25 00:28 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports?
2004-01-25 21:36 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
2004-01-26 05:39 Re: about writing a new front end for gcc
2004-01-26 18:46 ia64-hpux crash in alias.c
2004-01-26 19:16 Re: ia64-hpux crash in alias.c
2004-01-27 18:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-01-27 21:21 Re: how to compile gcc with profiling on..
2004-01-28 07:11 Re: about the interfaces of a front end
2004-01-28 17:44 Re: about the interfaces of a front end
2004-01-29 04:22 Re: Removing cut-n-paste comments about target macros/hooks.
2004-01-29 17:42 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 18:37 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 18:52 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-29 19:19 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-01-31 18:17 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-01-31 18:41 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-01-31 18:45 Re: C99 usage in gcc

Zack Winkles

2004-01-17 20:19 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc
2004-01-20 12:49 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4
2004-01-20 23:28 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

Zdenek Dvorak

2004-01-07 01:24 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 01:52 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-08 13:19 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning
2004-01-13 15:18 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions
2004-01-22 11:39 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ???
2004-01-22 19:32 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
2004-01-22 19:36 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 19:41 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 20:09 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-22 22:51 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-23 19:46 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-25 16:59 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-29 12:19 Re: New loop unroller broken?
2004-01-29 22:22 Why gimplification regimplifies things?
2004-01-30 00:26 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things?
2004-01-31 09:13 Re: BB reordering question
2004-01-31 21:51 Re: BB reordering question

Ziemowit Laski

2004-01-09 05:06 Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort?
2004-01-09 05:12 CORRECTED: Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort?
2004-01-09 06:43 Re: CORRECTED: Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort?
2004-01-13 00:11 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:23 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:54 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 00:55 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-13 01:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
2004-01-18 23:11 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 23:23 Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-18 23:36 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0
2004-01-20 19:24 [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-20 21:44 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-20 22:15 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-20 23:42 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-21 20:38 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++
2004-01-31 00:55 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function

znsoft

2004-01-19 05:48 gcc-3.3.2 freebsd 4.9 bug?

��ʤ

2004-01-26 05:14 about writing a new front end for gcc

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for January, 2004

gcc archive
author index for January, 2004