Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing

[Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>]

Eric Botcazou wrote:

> > Ok, but for LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32 is think we just introduce a new variable
> > here. On 32 bit environments LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32 == LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
>
> Sure? 

No. This is what I got experience from the current settings.

here on a sol9 32 bit build I only set LD_LIBRARY_PATH for the 32 bit 
testing and then for the 64 bit one LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64.

> What I understood is that LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32 will prevent any 
> subsequent sets of LD_LIBRARY_PATH from having any effect on 32-bit 
> executables.


Ok, I then prepare something in the next days to introduce these two 
environment variables in the different test suites.

LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32 for 32 bit libraries on solaris.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for 64 bit libraries on solaris.


Andreas

P.S, still don't know where to place the documentation about it :)