This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Readiness of tree-ssa

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>, Brian Booth <bbooth at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:50:49 -0500
Subject: Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200401201348.42927.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <200401211416.07981.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <1074717720.20018.67.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200401211446.04734.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>

On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 15:46, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:

> > Does bugzilla have a voting mechanism?  We are probably not going to fix
> > *all* the PRs prior to merging.
> 
> You can use the priority/severity fields for this. However, my understanding 
> was that merging a branch usually requires zero new regressions. I think you 
> can't unilaterally decide which bugs you'd like to fix before merging.
> 
I didn't mean that.  I was taking the other criteria for granted.


Diego.

References:
- Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]