This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:47:37 -0800
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
- References: <4B65790D-4620-11D8-BCF6-003065A77310@apple.com>
On Jan 13, 2004, at 15:29, Mike Stump wrote:
On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 03:13 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Some of the problem is that we have people maintaining *large*
numbers of areas of the compiler
We need more people assigned (not more assignments for existing
people) to various areas of the compiler, who *want* to be [ ... ]
Along these lines, I'd like to see C++ about 4x faster. I'd be happy
with 2x faster, anything less, well, isn't interesting. I'd like
for the SC to find and appoint such a person to tackle speed problems.
So far, it isn't happening...
1 - Assumes no regressions...
C++ has been improved for 3.4 compared to even 2.95.3. One we are more
complaint. Two, speed also has decreased (at least in the last three
days, mostly thanks
to Jan Hubicka). Optimization speed has also decreased also. Looks
like you are
volunteering for the position of speeding up C++.