This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>,"Arnaud Charlet" <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
- Cc: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'Mark Mitchell '" <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"'Gabriel Dos Reis '" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,"'Nathan Sidwell '" <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:41:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401120935280.21333-100000@acapulco.ices.utexas.edu>
Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>> I don't think it is reasonable to have only one person handle these
>> things: we are already seeing that this is not a viable approach.
>
> Quite right. The RM can delegate this work, but I am not aware that
> he did in this case.
Yes, I agree with Arnaud. I think it's useful to allow the maintainer of the
code affected by the bug to postpone the milestone as well.
Giovanni Bajo