This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: povray: Revised numbers

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>,Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>,Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:45:14 -0500
Subject: Re: povray: Revised numbers
References: <4009AA3F.2020208@coyotegulch.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401201948190.1254@goofy> <A8CCDFE0-4B87-11D8-A9D5-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <200401202136.39101.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>

On Jan 20, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:

On Tuesday 20 January 2004 21:31, Daniel Berlin wrote:
One of the reasons i haven't requested that points-to be turned on by
default is that it won't have a performance impact until i've finished
the aforementioned code.
It would give you some testing input though.

Yeah, but so does the bootstrap and regression test. :) It might stop people from breaking it every third week by slightly changing GIMPLE predicates and whatnot (so we get operations we never had to handle before), but then they'd just ask me to fix it anyway.

Hey, i'm all for turning it on by default, don't get me wrong, I just don't see it doing anything for the majority of cases yet. But if people are okay with that, ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: povray: Revised numbers
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- povray: Revised numbers
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: povray: Revised numbers
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: povray: Revised numbers
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: povray: Revised numbers
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]