This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [new-ra] Development status?
Michael Matz <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Denis Chertykov wrote:
> > 4. Then, allocator must have a support for register elimination.
> Indeed, I forgot.
> > Michael ! I have completed the patch which calculate register classes
> > preferences as regclass (not as pre-reload).
> > Yes. I have converted regclass routines to work with webs.
> I had hoped there would be something better than regclass on
> webs. *sniff*
I'm too, but I can't imagine another way to got a quick comparison of
results pre-reload classes and regclass classes.
> > I was interested in comparision of results given by pre-reload based
> > web_class and regclass based web_class.
> They at least shouldn't be worse, I think, are they?
The results are *equal* !!! (for x86)
Exclude a few difficult cases.
> > Are you ready to look at patch and results ?
> Yes, please.
I can send it tomorrow morning. (I forgot the code at my work. The
mail will be from firstname.lastname@example.org)
After you got the patch and seeing on results I would discuss the
problem of register classes in new-ra. Is this OK ?