This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal

From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>, Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr dot net>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>, Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:38:07 +0100
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
References: <200401211157.i0LBveM04894@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

But on the other hand, caches were smaller, not backed by L2, and were
often allocate-on-write only (so zeroing a structure can be very

Did you mean to say allocate-on-read, or am I just confused beyond words?

expensive, especially if it is then re-initialized with other data). All of these affect general approaches to what needs optimizing.

Amen.

Segher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]