This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>, Gerald Pfeifer <gp at suse dot de>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:38:35 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200401170613.i0H6Dkq2027085@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 01:13, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >> I take it you believe that all the coding conventions are properly
> >> followed on tree-ssa? For example, all command-line options added are
> >> documented, including the details of what is enabled at what -O levels
> >> (listed both under the options themselves and under the -O options);
> Err, no they aren't. For example we have a host of -f options which control
> debugging dumps rather than code generation. That's wrong.
So does mainline and all the releases that have included -fdump-tree...
We didn't invent that.