This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Classifying bugs
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
- To: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Gabriel Dos Reis '" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, "'Andrew Pinski '" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:28:04 -0600 (CST)
- Subject: RE: Classifying bugs
> Why was this policy not discussed on gcc@, or at least announced?
That may well have been a deficiency. We have a private mailing list for
bugzilla people where we discuss some policies in case there are
questions. We discussed this particular questions there (with said person
being subscribed to it), and I had discussed this with him in private mail
before as well.
> I do not agree with all downgradings, but I disagree even more with
> the ease with which some bugmasters assign a target milestone. If
> you want to be so strict about all this, then you should discuss
> every milestone with the RM.
Indeed.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/