This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:52:25 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
References: <10401170324.AA15949@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1074309907.3147.139.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

Diego Novillo wrote:

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 22:24, Richard Kenner wrote:
Remember that the last time we had the discussion of the timing of tree-ssa,
people claimed it was "essential" for 3.5 since there was a tremendous
improvement on some C++ cases.  So let's see those cases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12747


Can you give numbers?  I.e. how much faster does that (or a similar)
testcase run?  Have we met Kenner's 2x goal?
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]