This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Keeping builtins in non-gimple form?

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com, dnovillo at redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:10:42 +0100
Subject: Keeping builtins in non-gimple form?

Hi,
PR 13524 is related to failed inline into machine builtin call.  This
seems to be caused by fact that we don't gimplify arguments to builtins.
Is this still necessary?  My recollection is that va_start needed this
trick, but do we still have some machine scpecific builtins requiring
this?

Honza

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]