This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
> > In fact, I finally got around to building gcc-head, and comparing it > > to gcc 3.3.2. > > > > To say that the results are disappointing would be an understatement: > > > > Time for a kernel compile, gcc 3.3.2: > > 276.63s real 193.01s user 26.86s system > > with gcc-head: > > 341.31s real 213.25s user 27.87s system > > > > Exact same options, basically -O2. > > > > Now, tell me again that GCC is getting faster... > > This is precisely what I intend to do now, yes. > I re-did your experiment on my notebook (Centrino, 256MB ram) with Linux > kernel 2.6.1. I disabled checking and profiledbootstrapped mainline, > and compared it to current disabled checking bootstrapped 3.2 branch. > > For 3.4 I get: > real 6m44.513s > user 6m13.057s > sys 0m23.915s > > For 3.2 I get: > real 7m53.661s > user 7m19.730s > sys 0m24.206s > For 3.3 I get: real 7m50.506s user 7m6.577s sys 0m29.863s So it appears that your problem may be just trivial bug either in GCC or testing. If you provide more details, I will look into it. Honza
Attachment:
3.3
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |