This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:32:54AM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Just an idea: m68k is the only cc0 target capable of an > hosted bootstrap. Is it possible that middle-end changes > have subtly broken cc0 targets without anyone noticing > except on the m68k?
Possible, yes. It wouldn't be my first guess though.
VAX (a cc0 target) is also quite broken in gcc 3.4. I've been at a loss to figure out why. (And VAX could do a hosted bootstrap if gcc wasn't so broken).
-- Matt Thomas email: matt@3am-software.com 3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/ Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |