This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
At 01:11 AM 1/11/2004, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:32:54AM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Just an idea: m68k is the only cc0 target capable of an
> hosted bootstrap. Is it possible that middle-end changes
> have subtly broken cc0 targets without anyone noticing
> except on the m68k?
Possible, yes. It wouldn't be my first guess though.
VAX (a cc0 target) is also quite broken in gcc 3.4. I've been at a
loss to figure out why. (And VAX could do a hosted bootstrap if gcc
wasn't so broken).
Matt Thomas email: email@example.com
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.