This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Readiness of tree-ssa

From: prj at po dot cwru dot edu (Paul Jarc)
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>,Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>,Brian Booth <bbooth at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:52:08 -0500
Subject: Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid?
References: <200401201348.42927.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu><200401211416.07981.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu><1074717720.20018.67.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com><200401211446.04734.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>

Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> However, my understanding was that merging a branch usually requires
> zero new regressions.

Just a thought: one new regression could be allowed for each
regression that is fixed on the branch but not on mainline - so zero
*net* new regressions.  I don't remember exactly whether there are any
in this case anyway.

paul

References:
- Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]