This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
- From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr dot net>,Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>, geoffk at apple dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:23:10 -0500
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
- References: <21A8E98A-4AED-11D8-B42C-003065A77310@apple.com>
Mike Stump wrote:
Yes, but the sad thing is that I suspect it is 50% slower or more on a 8
GHz machine as well, in fact, I wonder if it is worse than 50% slower.
What do we gain in terms of language support and generated code speed,
in return for slower compile times? We keep talking about C++, but C
compile times have slowed too...
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing