This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
- To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
- Cc: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Mark Mitchell '" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "'Giovanni Bajo '" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>, "'Gabriel Dos Reis '" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, "'Nathan Sidwell '" <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:37:18 -0600 (CST)
- Subject: Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual
> I don't think it is reasonable to have only one person handle these
> things: we are already seeing that this is not a viable approach.
Quite right. The RM can delegate this work, but I am not aware that he did
in this case.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/