This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?


Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

I guess it depends on whether you think "highly inaccuarate"[1] material
is a "good, free, introduction".

[1] Those are words used to describe that paper

Used by _you_? Why don't you explain a bit why exactly you believe those papers are so bad? Otherwise, why Olivier (or me) should buy a whole book, or the highly technical C++ Standard or bother Adamczyk himself only to learn something about "Export"? "Export" is not mine or Olivier profession and we don't plan to devote a couple of years to implement it, as happened at EDG.

Personally, I learned from the paper and, personally, I believe that the
standards of quality of the WG papers are pretty high, personally I'd
appreciate if you could devote more time to _construct_ instead of
_dismiss_: in this particular case the latter activity would be called
_popularizing_.

Paolo.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]