This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: wilson at specifixinc dot com
Cc: gp at qnx dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:58:22 -0500
Subject: Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
References: <004101c3df8d$43c2d290$94010c0a@gpnt><400DCFC3.5080508@specifixinc.com> <200401210125.i0L1PaYY030849@greed.delorie.com><1074650134.1016.20.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org> <200401210222.i0L2M7i9031582@greed.delorie.com><1074655468.1236.58.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org> <200401211903.i0LJ3OmQ025817@greed.delorie.com> <1074714277.1029.27.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org>

> I don't like it, but if you can get someone else to approve it I won't
> object.

How about a compromise?  Revert the const in the 3.4 branch, but
require a redesign for 3.5?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Graeme Peterson
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]