This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:07:33PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Gunther Nikl <gni@gecko.de> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:32:54AM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >> Just an idea: m68k is the only cc0 target capable of an hosted bootstrap.
> >
> >   I wonder how hard it would be to change m68k into a non-cc0 port.
> 
> What would be the advantage in general?

  No CC bugs? :) Wasn't ix86 before GCC 3.x a CC port?
  AFAICT, there is no primary cc0 port anymore and thus cc0 ports don't
  get much testing. Thus errors only affecting such ports will stay
  (almost) unnoticed.

  Gunther
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]