This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:42:15 -0800
Subject: Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
References: <10401281810.AA08099@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20040128122328.A24535@synopsys.com> <40188A9E.7080107@gnat.com>

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:22:54PM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:10:37PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > 
> >>    The SC isn't going to reject implementation of "export"; RMS will drag
> >>    his heels a bit, but he's accepted GNAT's support of dumping and reloading
> >>    meta-information about Ada programs, 
> 
> I am not sure it is fair to say that RMS has accepted the GNAT support
> in this area, I don't ever remember it being properly discussed.
> Perhaps it should be!

It was discussed on the SC list (in the context of an argument about
support of meta-information for C/C++).  RMS knows about it, though
probably not all the details.

References:
- Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]