This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>, Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr dot net>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>, Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:04:24 +0000
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> > But on the other hand, caches were smaller, not backed by L2, and were
> > often allocate-on-write only (so zeroing a structure can be very
>
> Did you mean to say allocate-on-read, or am I just confused beyond
> words?
>
Err, I meant to say that they were *not* allocate-on-write -- which
amounts to about the same thing, yes.
R.