This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken LinkOn Front Page)

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:20:14 -0800
Subject: Re: Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken LinkOn Front Page)
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20040118092340.EF66626AC8B@water-ox.its.caltech.edu> <400ABB47.30301@pop.agri.ch> <400ABCE7.3060106@pop.agri.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401181818050.10962@D209.suse.de> <400AC198.5030907@pop.agri.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401181828530.10962@D209.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401181750440.3685@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401212029580.18652@lifschitz.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401212246340.14265@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401221100020.75838@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

changes.html and criteria.html are indeed files to create when the
previous release branches, except that we have no criteria for 3.4 (in
particular, no list of the primary release platforms on which
regressions should be avoided

Mark?

I'm not sure what to say. The GCC SC never decided to change this, so, for now, I'm assuming we'll use the same platforms that were used in the past.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com

References:
- Broken Link On Front Page
  - From: Stephan T. Lavavej
- Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken Link OnFront Page)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]