This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:28:46 -0500
Subject: Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0401081510250.4680@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <1073574032.3165.20.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0401081618180.4680@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>

On Jan 8, 2004, at 10:19 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:53, Richard Guenther wrote:
-O0 220MB, 0m17s
-O1 260MB, 0m24s
-O2 800MB, 7m35s  (-ftime-report on a faster machine attached below)
-O2 -fno-unit-at-a-time 260MB, 0m28s
Hmm, based on what the time report says, could you try with
-fno-tree-pre?
loop times go up the roof then, but the tree stuff looks ok.

Also, how much memory with -fno-tree-pre at -O2?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]