This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4


To be more precise, these patches are marked "wrong-code" where they
in reality are "wrong-debug":
...
I would like to remove the wrong-code markers on these, since we have
the component "debug" for this (which these are all in, btw).  Any
objections to that?

I certainly don't *object* ... I'm nowhere near active enough to have that loud a voice, but I would like to offer an opinion. I think people take wrong-code bugs more seriously than wrong-debug. Its an emotional thing, is just SOUNDS more serious. But I think they are equally serious. If the compiler has bugs that hamper the development process, be it mis-optimization or the inability to debug efficiently, it still slows the developer down just as much. Granted the wrong-compile bugs do have a more negative impact as they can affect correct program behaviour, but if leaving these bugs marked as wrong-code is likely to get them looked at before, say, documentation bugs (as most doc writers will lament, nobody ever reads it anyway!), then I think its a good thing.


Kean



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]