This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Combined tree build broken?
- From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
- To: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 18:43:56 -0800
- Subject: Re: Combined tree build broken?
- References: <3FF840AE.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
is it just me or bootstrap of the GCC/binutils combined tree has been
for a couple of months?
Which "combined" tree are you using? The documented one probably works.
The uberbaum tree probably doesn't. Keep in mind that uberbaum is
unofficial and unsupported, has been broken for a long time, and will
probably continue to be broken for a long time in the future. If you
want to use it, you will have to work around problems with it.
The rda problem has been there for a long time. rda configury is
broken. You can avoid building it by renaming rda to rda-bad.
I haven't tried an uberbaum build in a while, but if there are
tcl/expect problems, it is probably because different packages in the
tree are expecting different tcl/expect versions, and there is no simple
way to resolve this problem as the tree can only contain one version of
expect and one version of tcl. If there are packages with conflicting
requirements, then they will have to be built separately.
Uberbaum problems are not gcc problems. We don't recommend use of
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com