This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Combined tree build broken?

Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
is it just me or bootstrap of the GCC/binutils combined tree has been failing
for a couple of months?

Which "combined" tree are you using? The documented one probably works. The uberbaum tree probably doesn't. Keep in mind that uberbaum is unofficial and unsupported, has been broken for a long time, and will probably continue to be broken for a long time in the future. If you want to use it, you will have to work around problems with it.

The rda problem has been there for a long time. rda configury is broken. You can avoid building it by renaming rda to rda-bad.

I haven't tried an uberbaum build in a while, but if there are tcl/expect problems, it is probably because different packages in the tree are expecting different tcl/expect versions, and there is no simple way to resolve this problem as the tree can only contain one version of expect and one version of tcl. If there are packages with conflicting requirements, then they will have to be built separately.

Uberbaum problems are not gcc problems. We don't recommend use of uberbaum, officially.
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support,

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]