This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: State of gcc 3.3
Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
| Hi!
|
| The 3.3 branch seems to be in a quite bad state now, as I see several
| pooma regressions compared to snapshots from november:
|
| -PASSED ... array_test1
| -PASSED ... array_test7
| -PASSED ... array_test21
| -PASSED ... array_test27
| -PASSED ... array_test28
| +PASSED ... indirectionlist_test1
| -PASSED ... ump_test5: guard cell fill test.
| -PASSED ... ump_test7
| -PASSED ... brickviewbase_test3
| +FAILED ... brickviewbase_test3
| -PASSED ... Gradient
| -PASSED ... FileSetWriter
| -PASSED ... FileSetWriterTest2
| -PASSED ... ReduceOverContexts Test
| +PASSED ... CollectFromContextsTest
|
| Standard checking options include -O2 -funroll-loops -g
That is odd.
| Anyone interested?
I know of a C++ patch that I backported from mailine and that passed
the regression test and is reported to cause a name lookup
regression.
I don't know whether what you see is related to that.
-- Gaby