This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:20:12 -0800
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
References: <200401201348.42927.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401202053460.1254@goofy> <1074629255.14606.64.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401202252430.1254@goofy> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401202346300.1254@goofy>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:52:07PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I just checked 3.4 branch and get exactly the same failure.  And I can't
> find any trace of _Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow being defined or used anywhere
> but as extern declaration in unwind.h ...

It's in unwind.inc.

> anyone has an idea what I'm doing wrong? This is Debian unstable, binutils
> is 2.14.90.0.7-3, libc 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.

Did you configure for libunwind, and not have a version that
is up-to-date enough to provide this symbol?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]