This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
- To: Marc Espie <espie at nerim dot net>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:07:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus
- References: <20040104181234.GA15826@tetto.gentiane.org>
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Marc Espie wrote:
> tm.texi says:
>
> >GCC comes with an implementation of @code{<varargs.h>} and
> >@code{<stdarg.h>} that work without change on machines that pass arguments
> >on the stack. Other machines require their own implementations of
> >varargs, and the two machine independent header files must have
> >conditionals to include it.
>
> When did the implementation change ?
To which change to you refer?
(a) The removal of support for <varargs.h> was in 3.3, associated with
removing -traditional.
(b) That the current way targets support <stdarg.h> is undocumented is
well-known (bug 3386, originally opened as a regression in 3.0).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk