This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> I actually don't mind the idea of ObjC, although > I will probably only use it > minimistically..what I take issue with, > specifically, is the fact that > you have carte blanche control over anything > objc related in GCC, and you > act like a lord, dictating what will happen and > when, instead of working with people. I don't like to butt into threads like this, but what is the problem here? We explicitly allow developers to create branches on which they specify the check-in criteria. We do this precisely for occurrences like this, to develop or integrate a specific feature. Would it help us if Zem just sent in a single massive patch to gcc-patches, and nobody got a chance to test/comment on the code before it gets reviewed and merged onto mainline? In any case, rather than hurling around accusationas, if there are specific patches/issues you'd like addressed, perhaps you could specify what they are? Cheers, Dara __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |