This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Gerald Pfeifer <gp at suse dot de>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:22:19 -0800
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
- References: <200401170613.i0H6Dkq2027085@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Jan 16, 2004, at 22:13, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Err, no they aren't. For example we have a host of -f options which
debugging dumps rather than code generation. That's wrong.
But so does C++ already, it has a couple of -fdump-* switches already.
-fdump-unnumbered does not effect code gen.
-fverbose-asm does not effect code gen either.
-fstats (C++) does not effect code gen either.
I could go on, why has no one changed them if they are wrong?