This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM, dnovillo at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:08:01 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <1074366070.3537.36.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> <200401200139.i0K1dsUu019678@caip.rutgers.edu> <m31xpv1j23.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

The impression I've gotten from the thread that led to the sudden gcc-3.4.x branching was that some major vendors are going to skip GCC-3.4.x entirely, and they don't see any benefits in delaying branching.

It's a highly peripheral point to the main discussion, but, for the record, the creation of GCC 3.4 branch creation had nothing to do with any vendor input.

I had announced some time ago that the GCC 3.4 branch would be made when the number of regression fell below 100, and it did, so I made the branch.

-- Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]