This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Your change causing regressions
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:16:33 -0700
- Subject: Your change causing regressions
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
This change:
2004-01-18 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* tree-sra.c (REALPART_INDEX, IMAGPART_INDEX): Remove.
(sra_candidates, needs_copy_in): Use a bitmap. Update all users.
(struct sra_elt, sra_elt_hash, sra_elt_eq): New.
(sra_map_size): Remove.
(sra_map): Use a htab_t.
(lookup_scalar): Update to match.
(get_scalar_for_field, get_scalar_for_complex_part): Likewise.
(scalarize_structure_assignment): Use annotate_all_with_locus.
(csc_build_component_ref): Remove index argument.
(csc_build_complex_part): Take tree_code, not index.
(create_scalar_copies): Don't collect indicies.
(emit_scalar_copies): New.
(scalarize_modify_expr, scalarize_tree_list): Use it.
(scalarize_return_expr): Likewise.
(scalarize_structures): Simplify needs_copy_in iteration.
(scalarize_call_expr): Use annotate_all_with_locus.
(dump_sra_map_trav): Split from ...
(dump_sra_map): ... here. Update for hash table.
(tree_sra): Update for new datastructures.
Is causing libstdc++ regressions. Specifically:
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test