gcc archive
author index for January, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

'jtv'

• 2002-01-08 03:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

3346572

• 2002-01-28 19:33 ºÃ¾ÃûÓп´¼ûÄãÁË£¬Ä㻹ºÃÂð£¿

$B!J3t!KA4?.6(8\Ld(B

• 2002-01-16 09:57 $BL4$N#12/1_$X$NF;!*$"$J$?$b8\Ld$K$J$C$F:_Bp9b<}F~!*(B
• 2002-01-16 09:57 $BL4$N#12/1_$X$NF;!*$"$J$?$b8\Ld$K$J$C$F:_Bp9b<}F~!*(B

Frédéric L. W. Meunier

• 2002-01-18 03:33 2.95.4 release ?
• 2002-01-21 05:12 GCC 3.0.3 20020121 fails to compile with glibc 2.2.5 ?
• 2002-01-21 05:29 Re: GCC 3.0.3 20020121 fails to compile with glibc 2.2.5 ?

cesar tejeda

• 2002-01-11 05:17 Alternative to named return value extension is worse.
• 2002-01-11 05:43 mailing list question.
• 2002-01-18 04:53 Help g++ problem.

Gérard Roudier

• 2002-01-09 11:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 14:00 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

John Eigelaar

• 2002-01-03 12:49 gcc build for AVR

Mr Adam Cioccarelli

• 2002-01-03 01:44 gcc 3.0.3 success on slackware

thomas joseph

• 2002-01-23 06:28 g++ compiler
• 2002-01-23 22:45 g++ compiler

=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?wPzBvsfK?=

• 2002-01-30 06:16 Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed

AaZbooks.com

• 2002-01-25 15:43 Nouvelles acquisitions / New online
• 2002-01-25 15:43 Nouvelles acquisitions / New online

Abizar

• 2002-01-23 00:53 What does "pure virtual method called" error mean?

Adam Megacz

• 2002-01-14 09:21 DWARF2-win32 and gcc/gcc/unwind-pe.h?
• 2002-01-14 16:54 what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean?
• 2002-01-17 15:02 Re: what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean?

aditya

• 2002-01-18 02:33 typed memory objects

Adrian von Bidder

• 2002-01-08 07:34 Re: program compiled with GCC
• 2002-01-09 02:48 ARM: handling of weak symbols in thumb code
• 2002-01-09 08:18 multilib issues
• 2002-01-15 08:33 arm/thumb: GOT and indirections
• 2002-01-16 02:06 Re: arm/thumb: GOT and indirections
• 2002-01-25 02:25 ARM thumb: why call_via_rX?
• 2002-01-25 04:17 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX?
• 2002-01-25 04:45 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX?
• 2002-01-28 07:44 ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-29 02:24 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-30 00:08 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?

akbara

• 2002-01-10 12:16 Re: cos?

Alaeddin A. Aydiner

• 2002-01-20 12:07 Two-stage lookup for templates in 3.1?

Alain Hebert

• 2002-01-31 07:09 Java--C++ interface

Alan Cox

• 2002-01-02 16:15 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 08:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 11:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Alan Lehotsky

• 2002-01-24 16:52 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale

Alan Modra

• 2002-01-24 03:38 Re: Symbol versioning problem? Different versions of same symbol being called.

Albert Chin

• 2002-01-28 15:41 Re: gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms

Albert D. Cahalan

• 2002-01-05 20:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Aldy Hernandez

• 2002-01-05 23:24 Successful build on apple darwin5.2
• 2002-01-07 10:03 Re: Successful build on apple darwin5.2
• 2002-01-08 11:04 ambiguous insn in altivec
• 2002-01-10 09:03 Re: pre compiled headers
• 2002-01-14 11:01 rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 11:31 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 15:26 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 16:08 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 16:21 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-15 12:34 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-15 13:28 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-15 16:22 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-15 19:01 attributes in function arguments broken

Alex Sandro Garzão

• 2002-01-07 05:48 port to 80251 processor

Alex Zhukov

• 2002-01-03 02:32 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7

Alexander Poquet

• 2002-01-22 11:15 compiling current cvs sparcv9-solaris-2
• 2002-01-23 11:43 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 13:57 sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core

Alexander Sieb

• 2002-01-20 10:45 Re: constructor calling order

Alexandre Oliva

• 2002-01-01 10:00 Re: "GNU" and Ada
• 2002-01-01 14:49 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-01 15:29 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-01 15:33 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-01 16:32 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-02 08:36 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-03 10:44 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 10:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 10:46 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-06 09:34 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-06 11:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 13:06 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-06 13:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 13:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 13:38 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 13:45 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 13:48 Re: problem installation with zlib
• 2002-01-06 13:54 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 successful build of 3.0.3; libjava test problem
• 2002-01-06 17:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 17:48 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 17:51 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 20:04 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 20:10 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 21:35 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 04:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 04:50 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2
• 2002-01-09 14:11 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-10 12:58 Re: ia64
• 2002-01-11 13:54 Re: libtool in binutils question
• 2002-01-11 17:57 Re: NDEBUG
• 2002-01-14 09:17 Re: 2nd problem
• 2002-01-14 09:21 Re: Bug in tidy_fallthru_edges ?
• 2002-01-14 18:03 Re: 2nd problem
• 2002-01-15 16:12 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-16 08:46 Re: LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX
• 2002-01-16 08:48 Re: little problems with gcc 3.0.3
• 2002-01-17 07:22 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 07:26 Re: two constructor copies in object file
• 2002-01-17 07:34 Re: LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX
• 2002-01-17 12:24 Re: dwarf2out
• 2002-01-17 14:22 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-17 14:59 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-17 16:54 Re: How to tell gcc that a static function is really used?
• 2002-01-17 16:58 Re: Compiler
• 2002-01-17 17:05 Re: solaris 8 x86
• 2002-01-18 12:39 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-18 16:13 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-18 18:56 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-20 15:36 Re: ARM/Thumb mixed code
• 2002-01-22 06:45 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-22 07:27 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-22 08:23 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-22 08:51 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-23 07:24 Re: What does "pure virtual method called" error mean?
• 2002-01-23 13:25 Re: Severe Tire Damage
• 2002-01-23 18:20 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 18:39 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 18:48 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 20:48 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 15:36 Re: What does assembly-time constant mean?
• 2002-01-28 17:41 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-29 13:21 Re: new photos from my party!
• 2002-01-30 12:31 Re: Gcj Errors
• 2002-01-30 12:36 Re: HP-UX
• 2002-01-30 12:41 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 13:49 Re: Gcj Errors
• 2002-01-30 13:56 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage
• 2002-01-30 15:32 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-31 01:34 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-31 15:21 Re: gcc-3.0.4pre build on arm-linux
• 2002-01-31 15:30 Re: sun 0s -> gcc ERROR question

ali handuleh

• 2002-01-18 12:21 Re: Get your diploma in days

Amal burman

• 2002-01-15 00:12 new contribution

Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci

• 2002-01-04 19:08 Re: Old libstdc++-2.7.2
• 2002-01-05 07:27 Re: passwords for exceptions.pdf
• 2002-01-12 10:16 Re: spam mail
• 2002-01-13 17:35 GCC online documentation
• 2002-01-13 17:47 Web headers
• 2002-01-16 16:16 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-17 08:04 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-17 08:08 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-17 10:46 Re: gcc installation
• 2002-01-22 15:08 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?

Andreas Jaeger

• 2002-01-01 02:24 Re: GCC 3.1 problem with autoconf's configure scripts.
• 2002-01-01 14:19 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-02 22:30 gcc 3.0.3 seems to build libstdc++.so.3.0.2
• 2002-01-03 12:32 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 13:25 GCC 3.0.3 build for Alpha, i486, PowerPC (SuSE RPMs available)
• 2002-01-05 13:18 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-06 09:42 FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 10:01 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-08 07:46 x86-64 branch created
• 2002-01-08 22:32 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 05:55 Status of SSE/SSE2 builtins on ia32
• 2002-01-10 22:29 Re: possible problem in i386.h?
• 2002-01-10 22:57 Re: possible problem in i386.h?
• 2002-01-27 05:58 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-27 22:21 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64
• 2002-01-27 23:50 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark

Andreas Schwab

• 2002-01-06 07:58 Re: DW_OP_addr with undefined label
• 2002-01-09 06:44 Re: cross compilers without binutils
• 2002-01-12 10:03 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-18 15:11 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-24 08:17 libjava does not build
• 2002-01-28 04:53 Re: bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127

Andreas Tobler

• 2002-01-02 02:42 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h
• 2002-01-02 07:24 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h
• 2002-01-03 12:33 fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-03 13:19 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-03 14:40 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-04 02:14 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-04 02:14 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-04 02:14 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-04 13:23 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-17 23:41 your patch broke darwin libffi
• 2002-01-18 08:35 Re: your patch broke darwin libffi

Andrew Cagney

• 2002-01-02 12:18 Re: Please update config.guess for Linux/mips.
• 2002-01-05 09:56 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 12:08 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-12 16:39 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum ...
• 2002-01-23 18:26 Re: Help needed with sparc

Andrew Pinski

• 2002-01-01 19:29 Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h
• 2002-01-28 13:25 Re: empty loop elimination (lack of) ?
• 2002-01-28 15:59 Re: new photos from my party!

Andrew Pollard

• 2002-01-19 07:37 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? (Re: new PR libstdc++/5432)

Andrey Petrov

• 2002-01-30 11:38 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core

Andris Pavenis

• 2002-01-07 00:06 Random C testsuite failures for gcc-3_0-branch (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
• 2002-01-07 00:11 Random C testsuite failures for gcc-3_0-branch (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

andromeda

• 2002-01-15 12:26 compiled gcc

Andy Olson

• 2002-01-17 21:48 QNX Port
• 2002-01-18 09:23 Re: QNX Port

Anoop

• 2002-01-07 05:05 Help wanted on GCC port

Anthony Green

• 2002-01-31 07:16 Re: Java--C++ interface

Arvind Krishnaswamy

• 2002-01-16 10:27 function inlining in ARM/Thumb
• 2002-01-17 15:01 xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-18 11:09 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-19 11:25 termios.h for arm-elf-gcc?
• 2002-01-20 14:59 ARM/Thumb mixed code
• 2002-01-20 15:39 Re: ARM/Thumb mixed code
• 2002-01-24 14:13 ldreqd instruction in xscale
• 2002-01-24 18:13 Re: ldreqd instruction in arm version 4?
• 2002-01-25 07:23 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale
• 2002-01-27 17:04 gprof and xscale-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-27 18:07 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc

Atro Tossavainen

• 2002-01-27 23:21 gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms
• 2002-01-30 05:24 Re: gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms

bas.mevissen

• 2002-01-29 22:57 Support for C16x/ST10

ben woodhead

• 2002-01-22 08:47 build successful - gcc 3.1 20020121

Benjamin

• 2002-01-20 03:13 Non-Unified Memory Machine

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2002-01-16 09:41 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 11:52 Re: Fix 3272 and 5181 in the branch? (was: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?)

Benjamin Scherrey

• 2002-01-01 18:09 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-02 18:22 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-30 17:24 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin?

Bernard Dautrevaux

• 2002-01-02 02:10 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 02:13 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 02:44 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 05:33 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 05:37 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 11:26 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 01:54 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 03:22 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 01:15 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 02:51 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 01:13 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 11:13 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-16 05:26 RE: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 01:09 RE: two constructor copies in object file
• 2002-01-17 10:12 RE: two constructor copies in object file
• 2002-01-31 00:49 RE: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin?

Bernd Petrovitsch

• 2002-01-09 01:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 02:44 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Bert De Knuydt

• 2002-01-04 03:03 Successful build on IRIX 6.5.13m
• 2002-01-04 09:34 Successful build on Solaris 2.6
• 2002-01-07 06:54 Successful build on HPUX 11.00
• 2002-01-07 08:12 Successful build on Tru64, 4.0f
• 2002-01-09 08:17 Successful build on Ultrix 4.4 mips ECOFF

Bharadwaj Yadavalli

• 2002-01-18 10:00 [Q] Register mapping in Call Frame Instructions

Bill Clarke

• 2002-01-03 18:28 3.0.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8

Bill Hoffman

• 2002-01-18 04:44 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2002-01-07 14:12 RE: gcj on Cygwin
• 2002-01-15 03:41 RFC - g77 tests using dg-output
• 2002-01-24 15:06 RE: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-24 16:42 Problems debugging on irix
• 2002-01-24 19:40 RE: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-27 05:34 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 16:41 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 16:51 RE: Fortran testsuite problem
• 2002-01-29 17:30 RE: Fortran testsuite problem
• 2002-01-29 20:16 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 20:47 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-30 13:35 RE: gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms

Bo Thorsen

• 2002-01-09 06:16 Re: egcs/gcc ChangeLog Makefile.in config.in confi ...
• 2002-01-09 06:59 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-11 04:09 Re: Difficulty building stage 1 MIPS cross compiler from CVS...

Bob Donat

• 2002-01-04 07:02 successful build and installation GCC 3.0.3

Bob Wilson

• 2002-01-24 09:36 permission to be maintainer for Xtensa port

Boehm, Hans

• 2002-01-24 16:34 RE: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86

Bonzini

• 2002-01-18 05:59 Distributing new GCC releases on ftp.gnu.org -- conventions

Brad Lucier

• 2002-01-10 10:24 Re: sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=...
• 2002-01-10 15:38 Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon?
• 2002-01-10 21:07 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon?
• 2002-01-10 22:36 Re: possible problem in i386.h?
• 2002-01-16 14:48 continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as?
• 2002-01-17 09:17 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as?
• 2002-01-17 11:58 3.1 bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-17 17:14 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as?
• 2002-01-18 10:08 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as?
• 2002-01-23 11:29 Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 13:02 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 14:51 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 15:16 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 16:53 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 17:38 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 19:16 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 23:18 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 14:57 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core
• 2002-01-31 15:31 Re: Sparc bogosity

Bradley D. LaRonde

• 2002-01-02 09:58 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-16 08:07 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 09:02 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?

Brunken, Jere N, ALINF

• 2002-01-25 10:54 g2++comp availability

Bryan Rittmeyer

• 2002-01-10 18:42 PPC405 libstdc++ cross-compile fails w/ 3.0.3

Bryce McKinlay

• 2002-01-22 19:02 Re: a quicky about gcj command line
• 2002-01-25 19:41 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-25 22:14 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-28 08:33 Java & aliasing question
• 2002-01-30 18:41 Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava
• 2002-01-30 19:31 Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava

Cameron Simpson

• 2002-01-02 20:12 Re: C undefined behavior fix

Carlo Wood

• 2002-01-01 17:24 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-02 10:42 DWARF broken?
• 2002-01-02 15:35 Re: DWARF broken?
• 2002-01-02 15:42 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-02 20:56 Re: DWARF broken?
• 2002-01-05 06:54 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-23 16:34 Symbol versioning problem? Different versions of same symbol being called.
• 2002-01-24 06:00 Re: Symbol versioning problem? Different versions of same symbol being called.
• 2002-01-28 18:50 Re: new photos from my party!

Chanakya Koppolu

• 2002-01-01 13:47 discussion group

Chet Simpson

• 2002-01-24 19:04 New x86 target
• 2002-01-25 18:55 RE: New x86 target (OS-9/x86)
• 2002-01-28 16:28 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT

Chirvani Abdoullaev

• 2002-01-15 21:25 Re.: Question

Chris Lattner

• 2002-01-26 17:40 reload question

Chris Sears

• 2002-01-14 23:07 [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes
• 2002-01-15 12:21 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes
• 2002-01-15 17:47 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes

Chris Sontag

• 2002-01-07 07:57 gcc-3.0.3 install

Christine Kervus

• 2002-01-04 18:08 Remind Your Customers

Christopher Faylor

• 2002-01-01 12:36 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin
• 2002-01-03 17:25 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-04 09:46 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-10 14:08 [RFA] Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-11 10:43 Re: mailing list question.
• 2002-01-11 21:09 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-13 14:00 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-13 17:38 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 08:06 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 08:20 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 08:47 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 14:23 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?

Claus Fischer

• 2002-01-27 03:48 [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-27 05:11 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark

Colin Howell

• 2002-01-03 19:43 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++

Craig Rodrigues

• 2002-01-01 14:03 Re: discussion group
• 2002-01-02 09:53 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-02 15:44 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-02 19:18 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-02 22:01 gcc-prs archives recognize attachments?
• 2002-01-03 12:09 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 14:04 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-03 16:54 m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-03 20:23 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-04 20:38 Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 10:45 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-11 19:38 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-13 20:15 Re: regarding tree format.
• 2002-01-13 20:29 Re: binutils
• 2002-01-14 10:32 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 09:26 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 11:14 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 21:31 Re: Problem creating shared object with gcc on AIX 4.3.3
• 2002-01-17 22:01 Re: QNX Port
• 2002-01-22 15:02 What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-22 17:08 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-23 07:15 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-23 07:45 Re: What does "pure virtual method called" error mean?
• 2002-01-27 13:01 Question about PR 5478
• 2002-01-30 08:50 Re: Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed
• 2002-01-30 18:01 Re: which GCC version old or new?

Craig W. Wright

• 2002-01-02 18:35 The gnu linker.

CreamTec News

• 2002-01-21 14:26 New Java Swing web-enabling technology - you have to see it to believe it
• 2002-01-21 14:27 New Java Swing web-enabling technology - you have to see it to believe it

Cyrille Chepelov

• 2002-01-28 13:03 empty loop elimination (lack of) ?

d p chang

• 2002-01-23 15:47 mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 17:09 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 18:44 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 20:55 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 21:06 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 21:48 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 22:10 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-24 10:20 Re: mips64 inline question

Dale Johannesen

• 2002-01-03 10:38 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 17:18 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-03 17:29 Loop question
• 2002-01-08 12:22 gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-08 17:39 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-08 18:36 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 10:09 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-25 17:58 Re: ppc question for altivec
• 2002-01-28 12:47 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken

Damjan Lampret

• 2002-01-24 12:16 Re: [openrisc] Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions

Dan Nicolaescu

• 2002-01-23 16:38 g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-23 17:56 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 14:33 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 14:57 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-27 09:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools

Daniel Berlin

• 2002-01-01 14:37 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-01 14:38 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-01 16:21 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-01 20:58 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-01 21:00 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-02 07:02 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-03 10:11 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-03 20:45 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-05 11:20 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 11:31 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-08 11:29 Re: ambiguous insn in altivec
• 2002-01-10 04:53 Re: Bitset statistics
• 2002-01-10 05:05 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-10 06:52 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-11 06:05 Latest update on Bugzilla
• 2002-01-12 20:14 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 10:33 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 17:26 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 17:30 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-23 17:21 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-23 18:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 13:34 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 14:15 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 23:51 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 04:43 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 05:23 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 06:04 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 07:05 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 07:38 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 07:51 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:03 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:28 Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 08:31 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:35 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:35 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:49 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 08:54 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:58 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 09:13 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 09:21 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 09:36 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 09:49 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 10:15 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 10:17 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 14:19 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 14:21 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 14:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 16:20 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 18:20 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 18:37 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-26 23:52 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-27 20:43 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64
• 2002-01-28 15:41 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 16:15 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 17:40 Re: g++ and aliasing bools

daniel heiserer

• 2002-01-16 13:15 gcc mirror links

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2002-01-14 14:59 Re: debugging dwarf2 info
• 2002-01-15 12:42 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-23 17:20 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-30 08:59 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage

Daniel Towner

• 2002-01-17 10:47 legitimate_address_p query
• 2002-01-17 10:49 instantiate_virtual_regs query

Danish Samad

• 2002-01-03 02:56 problems building cross compilers
• 2002-01-08 22:56 cross compilers without binutils
• 2002-01-20 22:04 RTL creation
• 2002-01-23 22:01 possible bug in cygwin

David Edelsohn

• 2002-01-01 16:59 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-03 08:07 Re: gcc 3.0.3 seems to build libstdc++.so.3.0.2
• 2002-01-03 12:04 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 12:17 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 15:13 Re: ChangeLog rotation
• 2002-01-03 15:22 Re: ChangeLog rotation
• 2002-01-08 11:07 Re: ambiguous insn in altivec
• 2002-01-08 12:41 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 07:51 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-14 08:07 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-15 08:11 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem
• 2002-01-15 10:46 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem
• 2002-01-16 07:56 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 08:11 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 21:00 Re: Problem creating shared object with gcc on AIX 4.3.3
• 2002-01-17 14:31 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-18 08:05 Re: your patch broke darwin libffi
• 2002-01-24 10:36 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-24 16:09 Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-24 19:59 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 08:18 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 08:20 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 09:39 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 10:39 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 14:41 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 15:41 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 18:25 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 20:22 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-26 12:04 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-28 12:39 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-29 08:10 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 19:13 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 20:22 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 21:08 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.

David Imbeault

• 2002-01-12 15:15 I got the address you asked me

David Jung

• 2002-01-23 14:44 GCJ: Java generics ala Sun JDK1.5

David Mc Kenna

• 2002-01-18 02:01 GCC Output

David Mosberger

• 2002-01-14 18:07 [ANNOUNCE] first prototype of unwind API

David O'Brien

• 2002-01-24 09:25 ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-24 21:06 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h

David Rasmussen

• 2002-01-11 16:15 NDEBUG

David Weinehall

• 2002-01-10 02:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

David Woodhouse

• 2002-01-02 14:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:00 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Dennis Ferguson

• 2002-01-05 09:56 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 16:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Detlef Scholz

• 2002-01-03 07:59 Problems with c++ (gcc 2.95.3) on Sys V R4.0
• 2002-01-06 23:23 Re: Problems with c++ (gcc 2.95.3) on Sys V R4.0

dewar

• 2002-01-01 10:11 Re: "GNU" and Ada
• 2002-01-02 15:50 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:53 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:56 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 16:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 04:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 05:28 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 15:12 Re: Ada exception traceback
• 2002-01-04 04:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 04:15 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:38 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 14:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:56 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 15:05 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-04 15:17 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 16:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:24 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:55 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:57 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 18:57 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 19:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 19:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 04:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 04:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 04:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 16:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 17:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 17:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 19:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 08:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 08:25 Re: gcc question
• 2002-01-06 11:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 11:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 11:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 15:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:11 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:15 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:20 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 16:23 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-08 16:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 17:19 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 18:08 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-08 18:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 18:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 18:47 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 02:40 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 02:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 08:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 10:22 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 12:08 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 12:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 13:29 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 13:29 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 13:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 17:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 17:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 18:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 20:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 04:19 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 15:48 Re: Please don't sent threatening legalese to the gcc list (was Re: ia64)
• 2002-01-14 11:19 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 19:10 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)

Diego Novillo

• 2002-01-02 10:30 SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 13:07 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 14:02 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:00 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:07 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 12:59 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 18:16 Re: SIMPLE
• 2002-01-03 19:51 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 16:57 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 19:22 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 20:26 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 06:11 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 08:56 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 09:06 Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE)
• 2002-01-08 19:57 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-26 14:08 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged with mainline

Dimitri Frederickx

• 2002-01-31 06:52 WINCE

dimmy

• 2002-01-21 09:54 reload problem:
• 2002-01-22 07:56 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-22 08:40 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-22 09:04 Re: reload problem:

DJ Delorie

• 2002-01-03 11:13 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-03 11:58 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-10 14:41 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-14 10:44 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-14 13:50 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 08:09 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 08:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 11:16 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 11:42 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 12:29 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 13:28 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 19:20 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 07:17 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 08:03 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 15:03 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-24 16:14 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 14:09 sparc.c bogus comparison
• 2002-01-25 18:08 Re: sparc.c bogus comparison
• 2002-01-27 19:24 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted

Djkerster Lameprs

• 2002-01-15 15:02 About global varibles initialization

Dmitry

• 2002-01-22 06:53 Re: reload problem:
• 2002-01-25 00:45 compare instructions
• 2002-01-28 03:03 Re: compare instructions

doctorluhgh34281497

• 2002-01-30 10:52 =---Live 20 years longer with HGH---= 2814975443322222111

doctorluhgh34391913

• 2002-01-30 10:59 =---Live 20 years longer with HGH---= 39191397654433332222221

doctorluhgh34842211

• 2002-01-30 11:00 =---Live 20 years longer with HGH---= 84221111000000000000

Duraid Madina

• 2002-01-27 19:36 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64
• 2002-01-28 05:16 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64

e Catalog Order

• 2002-01-24 17:10 $ellOnline Fast Secure and Easy

Earl Healey

• 2002-01-13 20:18 binutils

Edward Lartey

• 2002-01-29 11:33 gcc3.0.3

Ehrke, Christian

• 2002-01-30 05:52 HP-UX

Eric Christopher

• 2002-01-03 15:45 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-11 00:30 Re: Difficulty building stage 1 MIPS cross compiler from CVS...
• 2002-01-16 00:30 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 11:56 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 00:45 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 00:45 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-29 20:30 Re: mips structure padding

Erik Trulsson

• 2002-01-10 04:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Eugen Rotariu

• 2002-01-07 00:19 gcj on Cygwin

Falk Hueffner

• 2002-01-04 14:49 Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-04 16:10 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-06 14:49 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-06 16:50 Re: Scheduling of asm()

Fergus Henderson

• 2002-01-07 01:45 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-08 19:17 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-08 21:14 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-09 01:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 17:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 21:51 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-27 23:37 Re: GCJ: Java generics ala Sun JDK1.5
• 2002-01-31 02:48 Re: mips structure padding

Florian Krohm

• 2002-01-15 09:17 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem

Florian Weimer

• 2002-01-01 11:29 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin
• 2002-01-01 11:39 Re: "GNU" and Ada
• 2002-01-02 02:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 15:08 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 15:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 15:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 15:09 Re: Ada exception traceback
• 2002-01-04 01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 15:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 15:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 03:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 03:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 03:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 11:46 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 12:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 12:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 00:03 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 00:46 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 07:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-27 04:45 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-28 07:52 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark

Franz Sirl

• 2002-01-10 07:15 Re: va_arg question
• 2002-01-22 06:59 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2002-01-01 16:44 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-02 00:30 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-05 17:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 17:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:23 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 08:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 12:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 02:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 03:06 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-16 07:49 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-17 09:34 CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-18 17:44 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-18 17:46 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-18 19:29 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-19 03:32 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-23 10:07 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-24 23:17 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 02:16 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 13:03 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 13:07 Re: g++ and aliasing bools

Gcc k6 testing account

• 2002-01-03 13:08 Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-03 15:08 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-03 15:24 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-03 16:08 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu

gccadmin

• 2002-01-07 20:39 gcc-ss-20020107 is now available
• 2002-01-14 18:13 gcc-ss-20020114 is now available
• 2002-01-21 19:12 gcc-ss-20020121 is now available
• 2002-01-28 18:24 gcc-ss-20020128 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2002-01-01 13:02 Re: "GNU" and Ada

Geert Uytterhoeven

• 2002-01-03 02:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Geoff Keating

• 2002-01-02 17:30 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 12:36 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 13:27 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 13:38 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-05 02:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 11:30 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 15:33 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 10:13 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-16 12:59 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-17 09:46 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-18 12:29 Re: Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted
• 2002-01-19 13:17 Re: Standards question: va_list vs. va_list *
• 2002-01-21 14:08 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-22 13:22 Re: [testcase] ia64 retaddr elimination failure
• 2002-01-22 16:41 Re: [testcase] ia64 retaddr elimination failure
• 2002-01-28 14:53 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-30 14:15 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-31 10:54 Re: PCH status??
• 2002-01-31 10:57 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-31 13:52 Re: PCH status??
• 2002-01-31 14:16 Re: Sparc bogosity
• 2002-01-31 20:27 regression tester scripts now in gcc/contrib/regression
• 2002-01-31 20:29 Re: Sparc bogosity

George.R.Goffe

• 2002-01-15 10:27 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem
• 2002-01-23 14:31 Re: libc core dump
• 2002-01-24 14:29 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core
• 2002-01-24 19:44 Re: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-31 15:10 Re: Sparc bogosity

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2002-01-04 07:08 C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings
• 2002-01-04 11:08 Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-04 11:16 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com
• 2002-01-04 11:41 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-04 14:04 Re: C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings
• 2002-01-05 05:30 Re: Revised clarifications for patch-testing instructions
• 2002-01-05 05:37 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com
• 2002-01-06 03:55 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-06 07:57 PATCH for Re: Mailing list usage
• 2002-01-06 11:35 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-07 03:17 Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4
• 2002-01-08 03:03 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4
• 2002-01-08 04:52 Re: gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link
• 2002-01-09 03:56 Re: gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link
• 2002-01-09 04:07 GCC, g++ entries in Free Software Directory
• 2002-01-10 06:37 PATCH for Re: page http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
• 2002-01-12 03:31 GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-13 12:00 PATCH for Re: Link failure
• 2002-01-14 08:34 Re: g++
• 2002-01-14 11:22 Re: GCC online documentation
• 2002-01-16 02:58 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 12:45 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-16 13:25 Re: gcc mirror links
• 2002-01-17 05:24 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-18 01:30 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-21 01:20 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-21 09:25 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-23 03:59 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don'twork
• 2002-01-24 09:41 NetBSD maintainer (was: [patch] Clean up NetBSD configs, fix NetBSDELF configs)

Gerardo Gonzalez

• 2002-01-17 15:48 Compiler

Goodwin, Kevin M.

• 2002-01-30 17:36 which GCC version old or new?

Graham Stott

• 2002-01-10 20:55 Re: Status of SSE/SSE2 builtins on ia32

Greg McGary

• 2002-01-04 10:55 Re: Bounds checker for g++ on Linux?
• 2002-01-07 16:11 Efficient gmon call-arc counting
• 2002-01-30 11:00 condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 11:55 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 15:19 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 17:13 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars

Gregor Zeitlinger

• 2002-01-08 07:07 Re: c++ code completion status report

Guillaume

• 2002-01-02 15:37 Ada exception traceback

H . J . Lu

• 2002-01-02 17:04 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-03 08:49 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-03 09:49 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-03 12:06 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-03 23:14 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-06 09:49 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 10:08 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 10:27 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 10:54 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-17 14:20 How to tell gcc that a static function is really used?
• 2002-01-20 11:39 gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
• 2002-01-20 12:45 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
• 2002-01-20 17:14 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
• 2002-01-24 13:59 libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-25 17:37 Strange testsuite/thread/pthread1.cc

Habib HAIBI

• 2002-01-05 04:22 Meilleurs Vœux pour 2002 : année de mémoire, de mobilisation, d'action, de justice et de sérénité - Appel au soutien moral et financier

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2002-01-04 15:48 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 14:51 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-08 16:48 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-29 15:58 Re: Fortran testsuite problem
• 2002-01-29 18:08 RE: Fortran testsuite problem
• 2002-01-29 18:21 RE: Fortran testsuite problem

harsha

• 2002-01-09 22:12 pre compiled headers
• 2002-01-16 20:10 constructor calling order

Hartmut Schirmer

• 2002-01-09 10:53 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc

Horst von Brand

• 2002-01-11 01:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Huber, George CECOM RDEC STCD SRI

• 2002-01-22 07:03 RE: static initialization of an array

Hudak, Tyler

• 2002-01-08 10:47 variables and stack space question

Hugues Leroy

• 2002-01-09 05:15 page http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html

Ian H Thain

• 2002-01-13 03:29 Link failure

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2002-01-11 15:38 Re: libtool in binutils question

Ingo Krabbe

• 2002-01-31 07:49 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code

J.A. Magallon

• 2002-01-07 16:23 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 15:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Jakub Jelinek

• 2002-01-01 14:50 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-02 05:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 07:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 07:23 Re: C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings
• 2002-01-04 15:07 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-06 12:04 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 14:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 05:32 Re: Is there a Problem with -g on mainline (470MB for a 7MB executable)?
• 2002-01-14 09:24 Re: DWARF2-win32 and gcc/gcc/unwind-pe.h?
• 2002-01-15 07:37 What to do against "X" constraints in asm statements
• 2002-01-16 02:35 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-17 02:49 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as?
• 2002-01-17 14:25 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as?
• 2002-01-20 12:53 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips
• 2002-01-21 07:58 Re: static initialization of an array
• 2002-01-24 12:20 Re: Help needed with sparc

James Mansion

• 2002-01-07 15:05 RE: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR

Jamie Lokier

• 2002-01-27 12:28 Re: errno values: poll

Jan Hubicka

• 2002-01-02 04:05 vortex peak performance regression
• 2002-01-02 05:26 Jason's calls.c patch and spec2000 performance regression
• 2002-01-03 05:40 Re: vortex peak performance regression
• 2002-01-03 05:47 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-03 12:03 Re: Your change breaks MIPS.
• 2002-01-10 06:32 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-11 04:23 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-14 12:50 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-14 13:36 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-14 13:38 Re: Have run out of space in CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P
• 2002-01-16 08:41 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-18 06:33 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-19 07:54 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-23 01:24 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc
• 2002-01-25 15:31 Re: loop optimizations
• 2002-01-25 15:34 Re: compare instructions
• 2002-01-28 04:46 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark

Jan Reimers

• 2002-01-29 12:21 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT

Janis Johnson

• 2002-01-02 09:28 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-02 09:30 Re: gcc 3.0.3 in HP-UX 11.11: success report
• 2002-01-02 20:54 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-03 15:01 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-03 15:30 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-03 16:27 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 successful build of 3.0.3; libjava test problem
• 2002-01-03 16:37 build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-03 17:20 Re: successful 3.0.3 bootstrap on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-04 09:08 Re: 3.0.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-01-04 09:09 Re: Successful build on IRIX 6.5.13m
• 2002-01-04 09:09 Re: Successfully built and installed GCC
• 2002-01-04 09:10 Re: successful build and installation GCC 3.0.3
• 2002-01-04 16:04 Re: Successful build on Solaris 2.6
• 2002-01-04 16:45 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-05 13:59 Re: GCC 3.0.3 build for Alpha, i486, PowerPC (SuSE RPMs available)
• 2002-01-06 11:57 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-07 09:43 Re: Successful build on HPUX 11.00
• 2002-01-07 09:45 Re: gcc-3.0.3 install
• 2002-01-07 09:47 Re: Successful build on Tru64, 4.0f
• 2002-01-07 09:51 Re: Successful build on apple darwin5.2
• 2002-01-09 08:55 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin
• 2002-01-09 08:57 Re: Successful build on Ultrix 4.4 mips ECOFF
• 2002-01-11 10:09 Re: gcov and C++'s global destructors
• 2002-01-12 02:07 Re: Successful: gcc 3.0.3 on SuSE 7.1
• 2002-01-12 12:05 Re: Successful build report
• 2002-01-14 10:12 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin
• 2002-01-15 11:08 Re: successfully built and installed GCC
• 2002-01-17 13:16 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-18 15:15 Re: successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch
• 2002-01-18 16:31 Re: successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch
• 2002-01-21 08:42 Re: successful build
• 2002-01-21 08:45 Re: Build Status for GCC 3.0
• 2002-01-21 08:51 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin
• 2002-01-22 09:39 Re: build successful - gcc 3.1 20020121
• 2002-01-25 17:24 Re: gcc-3.0.3 build success
• 2002-01-28 09:40 Re: Successful build of GCC 3.0.3
• 2002-01-29 09:05 Re: Install gcc
• 2002-01-30 13:53 Re: successful GCC 3.0.3 alphaev5-dec-osf4.0g build

Jason Merrill

• 2002-01-02 06:13 Re: Jason's calls.c patch and spec2000 performance regression
• 2002-01-02 10:29 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-11 04:10 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-11 05:31 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-18 02:49 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries
• 2002-01-18 04:40 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries
• 2002-01-18 04:57 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries
• 2002-01-18 05:34 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries
• 2002-01-18 07:34 Re: eon performance regression
• 2002-01-22 06:04 Re: Two-stage lookup for templates in 3.1?
• 2002-01-22 06:05 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?

Jason R Thorpe

• 2002-01-16 14:17 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 19:01 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-27 17:59 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-27 18:19 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-28 10:11 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config.gcc config/netbsd-aou ...
• 2002-01-28 10:24 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config.gcc config/netbsd-aou ...
• 2002-01-28 21:55 Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it?
• 2002-01-28 22:10 Re: Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it?

Jeff Sturm

• 2002-01-01 06:35 Re: libjava build failure sol2.6 asm problem?
• 2002-01-01 10:01 Re: libjava build failure sol2.6 asm problem?
• 2002-01-01 19:57 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-02 10:14 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-02 11:25 Re: DWARF broken?
• 2002-01-03 20:43 Re: 3.0.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-01-04 08:06 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-06 08:27 Re: gcc question
• 2002-01-07 07:36 Re: gcj on Cygwin
• 2002-01-07 14:09 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2
• 2002-01-07 15:17 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2
• 2002-01-08 16:04 Re: sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=...
• 2002-01-10 12:28 Re: sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=...
• 2002-01-14 20:13 Re: what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean?
• 2002-01-17 20:23 Re: what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean?
• 2002-01-23 13:11 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 14:44 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-23 16:07 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 07:44 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 10:23 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 12:50 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 15:18 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-24 15:30 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core
• 2002-01-24 17:00 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core
• 2002-01-24 17:10 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-25 10:21 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core
• 2002-01-25 10:35 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-31 16:07 Re: Sparc bogosity

Jeffrey Turner

• 2002-01-01 08:49 Why are we overusing the preprocessor?
• 2002-01-01 09:55 Project proposal
• 2002-01-01 10:00 Severity and Priority in the GNATS database

jeroen dobbelaere

• 2002-01-31 05:49 gcc-3.0.4pre build on arm-linux

Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai

• 2002-01-31 01:42 Re: HP-UX

Jesse Geddis

• 2002-01-17 14:15 solaris 8 x86
• 2002-01-17 14:26 FW: solaris 8 x86

jg

• 2002-01-07 21:49 non coherent options, switches and descriptions

Jim M.

• 2002-01-31 12:45 sun 0s -> gcc ERROR question
• 2002-01-31 12:46 son compler->gcc ERROR questino

Jim Wilson

• 2002-01-28 13:47 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 19:25 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-29 13:39 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]

jkl

• 2002-01-05 11:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 12:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 12:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Joe Buck

• 2002-01-02 09:07 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-02 12:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 12:22 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 13:16 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 14:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 14:52 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:16 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:59 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:36 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 07:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 10:31 Re: Problems with c++ (gcc 2.95.3) on Sys V R4.0
• 2002-01-03 12:41 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 12:44 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 15:49 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 16:05 sparc-sun-solaris2.7 successful build of 3.0.3; libjava test problem
• 2002-01-03 17:18 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 08:52 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 09:20 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com
• 2002-01-04 14:04 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 16:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:59 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:03 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 17:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 19:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 10:52 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4
• 2002-01-09 10:05 Re: GCC, g++ entries in Free Software Directory
• 2002-01-09 12:23 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 12:28 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 12:44 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 12:58 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 13:06 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 13:22 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 15:44 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 10:52 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 11:37 Re: export for Templates
• 2002-01-10 12:42 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 12:49 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 15:10 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 15:25 Please don't sent threatening legalese to the gcc list (was Re: ia64)
• 2002-01-11 09:53 Re: mailing list question.
• 2002-01-11 10:02 Re: gcov and C++'s global destructors
• 2002-01-11 10:27 Re: SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project
• 2002-01-14 11:11 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 13:11 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 15:49 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-15 08:38 Re: What to do against "X" constraints in asm statements
• 2002-01-15 16:04 Re: .NET Managed Extensions
• 2002-01-15 18:59 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes
• 2002-01-16 09:12 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 09:15 Re: GNATS Write Access
• 2002-01-16 09:40 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 10:03 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 11:27 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 18:09 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 18:21 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 11:43 Re: two constructor copies in object file
• 2002-01-17 11:53 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 12:15 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-17 14:21 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-18 09:26 Re: typed memory objects
• 2002-01-18 15:10 Re: QNX Port
• 2002-01-21 14:47 Re: constructor calling order
• 2002-01-22 13:18 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-23 09:43 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-23 09:50 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-23 11:36 Re: GCC 3.0.3 Question
• 2002-01-24 07:54 Re: gcc on Reliant unix (siemens)
• 2002-01-24 10:11 Re: g++ compiler
• 2002-01-24 14:16 Re: Access to symbol table from within a program
• 2002-01-25 08:55 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 08:58 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 11:36 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 11:45 Re: g2++comp availability
• 2002-01-25 12:06 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 12:09 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 12:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 13:16 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 15:13 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 15:23 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 18:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 09:01 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-28 09:22 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 09:58 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 15:43 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 15:50 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 17:11 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-29 22:21 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage
• 2002-01-30 07:48 Re: Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed
• 2002-01-30 16:19 Re: HP-UX

Joel Sherrill

• 2002-01-15 10:37 Re: new contribution
• 2002-01-15 16:44 Re: .NET Managed Extensions
• 2002-01-16 09:52 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?

John David Anglin

• 2002-01-22 09:08 Loop oddity
• 2002-01-22 10:20 Re: Loop oddity
• 2002-01-22 13:06 Re: Loop oddity
• 2002-01-28 15:37 Fortran testsuite problem

John Levon

• 2002-01-24 12:27 Re: Access to symbol table from within a program

John Marshall

• 2002-01-05 08:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

John Ogness

• 2002-01-04 05:33 Successfully built and installed GCC

John Wehle

• 2002-01-15 09:49 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes
• 2002-01-15 13:16 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes
• 2002-01-15 19:32 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes

johnrico

• 2002-01-28 22:51 HEY YOU .don't miss this

Joseph S. Myers

• 2002-01-01 11:01 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-01 11:04 Re: Severity and Priority in the GNATS database
• 2002-01-01 13:14 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-02 06:56 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 10:42 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 16:42 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-04 03:28 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-04 03:31 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-04 03:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 12:21 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-04 14:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:38 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 01:38 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 04:00 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:04 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 10:54 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 11:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 13:17 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-05 13:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 12:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 02:58 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 14:41 Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi
• 2002-01-07 15:07 Unused but documented target macros
• 2002-01-07 15:10 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi
• 2002-01-07 15:24 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi
• 2002-01-08 03:21 Checking for errors on stdout/stderr
• 2002-01-08 06:03 Re: gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link
• 2002-01-08 10:11 Defined but unused target macros
• 2002-01-08 12:41 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-08 14:39 WCHAR_UNSIGNED
• 2002-01-09 03:14 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-09 11:04 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 12:45 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 13:08 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 13:39 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 12:57 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 13:00 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 15:41 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-11 01:45 Order of docs for target options
• 2002-01-11 05:53 Re: SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project
• 2002-01-12 04:08 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-12 07:39 Re: makefiles in gcc
• 2002-01-13 06:48 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-14 04:10 Re: GCC online documentation
• 2002-01-14 04:12 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-14 11:08 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-15 11:11 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-15 15:29 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-16 03:50 Re: attributes in function arguments broken
• 2002-01-16 03:59 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 09:25 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 09:37 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 11:25 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 12:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 12:40 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 14:12 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 00:18 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 14:19 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-18 01:07 Re: QNX Port
• 2002-01-22 11:37 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-24 14:27 Re: permission to be maintainer for Xtensa port
• 2002-01-25 09:05 Re: PDF manual files

Joshua Haberman

• 2002-01-22 18:01 new command-line option idea

Joy Mukherjee

• 2002-01-29 10:55 Static variable addressing
• 2002-01-29 12:02 Static variable addressing (addendum)

jtv

• 2002-01-02 14:23 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:19 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:20 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 17:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 09:44 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 13:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 14:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 03:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 03:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 04:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 12:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Justin R. Gortner

• 2002-01-17 10:33 gcc installation

Kai Henningsen

• 2002-01-05 10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-16 05:27 Re: build status for cross builds?

kathy

• 2002-01-07 08:52 www.geocities.com/airotaxi/a.html

Kazu Hirata

• 2002-01-16 07:49 GNATS Write Access
• 2002-01-16 23:34 Deciding whether to put a testcase
• 2002-01-24 13:11 What does assembly-time constant mean?
• 2002-01-24 16:17 RE: What does assembly-time constant mean?
• 2002-01-31 05:18 RE: ICE on h8300-hms target

Ken Watson

• 2002-01-09 08:41 export for Templates

Kevin Franden

• 2002-01-19 23:43 successful build

Kim Sebo

• 2002-01-24 19:58 Re: errno values: poll

Kirill Ratkin

• 2002-01-11 04:37 gcc for inter 196 microcontroller

Krister Walfridsson

• 2002-01-05 10:37 Re: build status for cross builds?

Kurt M. Brown

• 2002-01-15 09:20 successfully built and installed GCC

Lars Brinkhoff

• 2002-01-03 04:00 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 05:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-22 09:48 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-22 23:49 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments

Laurent Guerby

• 2002-01-06 05:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 05:55 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 11:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-11 04:09 SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project
• 2002-01-11 10:37 Re: SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project

law

• 2002-01-02 22:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 11:29 A blast from the past
• 2002-01-03 12:27 Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 13:05 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 14:02 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 14:05 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 14:41 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 15:13 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 16:19 Re: ChangeLog rotation
• 2002-01-03 19:02 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 19:22 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 19:25 anoncvs.cygnus.com
• 2002-01-03 19:28 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-04 12:45 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com)
• 2002-01-05 10:22 Re: Retiring gccbug script?
• 2002-01-06 15:19 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 06:39 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 08:37 Re: long double (128-bit) support
• 2002-01-09 17:00 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-10 06:39 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-11 09:13 Re: A blast from the past
• 2002-01-22 09:34 Re: Loop oddity
• 2002-01-22 12:04 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-23 05:56 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc
• 2002-01-23 07:31 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-23 12:20 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc
• 2002-01-24 19:05 Re: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-25 07:24 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 08:49 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 12:11 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-28 10:33 paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:02 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:28 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:36 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:58 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 12:05 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 12:15 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 13:03 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 13:10 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 13:46 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-29 08:20 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]
• 2002-01-29 14:32 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]
• 2002-01-30 11:33 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 12:42 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 16:50 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-31 10:03 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]
• 2002-01-31 10:15 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]

linguist-gcc

• 2002-01-15 22:12 [3.0.3, 2.95.3] Endless loop with strstream.h included w/o instream.h
• 2002-01-24 12:22 Access to symbol table from within a program

Linus Torvalds

• 2002-01-04 13:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 13:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 13:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:24 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 15:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 18:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 19:09 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 20:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 21:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 11:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 11:53 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 12:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 17:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 19:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:08 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:56 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 12:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 18:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 20:59 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 08:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 11:37 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc

Loren James Rittle

• 2002-01-08 20:29 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4
• 2002-01-10 14:16 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4
• 2002-01-10 14:50 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4

lucier

• 2002-01-07 18:45 sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=...
• 2002-01-10 17:52 possible problem in i386.h?
• 2002-01-31 13:22 Sparc bogosity

M. R. Brown

• 2002-01-08 10:27 Re: Simple question.

Maciej W. Rozycki

• 2002-01-11 14:57 Re: libtool in binutils question
• 2002-01-11 16:24 Re: libtool in binutils question

Mack Lobell

• 2002-01-28 14:25 Problems building cross compiler on NT
• 2002-01-29 00:12 How to get dos path's in the debug information?
• 2002-01-29 10:31 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT
• 2002-01-30 12:33 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT
• 2002-01-30 12:41 How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin?
• 2002-01-31 00:37 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin?

MailEX

• 2002-01-26 00:00 Report to Recipient(s)
• 2002-01-26 00:01 Report to Recipient(s)

Marc Espie

• 2002-01-27 03:00 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-28 12:09 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions

marius aamodt eriksen

• 2002-01-24 18:52 Re: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-27 19:49 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64

Mark Mitchell

• 2002-01-15 10:27 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-15 10:28 Re: new contribution
• 2002-01-15 23:05 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-15 23:08 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 08:51 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 10:44 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 10:46 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 11:18 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 14:12 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-20 19:38 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-20 19:42 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-20 19:48 GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-20 20:36 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-21 09:37 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-24 13:26 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 13:43 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 14:30 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 14:40 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 11:37 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 11:45 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 12:23 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 13:29 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 20:14 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-26 22:02 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 15:20 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 16:09 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 17:28 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 18:14 Re: g++ and aliasing bools

market@todaynic.com

• 2002-01-17 07:33 Ðû´«Æ·ÅÆ£¬Ê¹ÓÃ×Ô¼ºµÄÓÊÏ䣡×âÓÿռ䣬¼´¿ÉËÍÄãÉÁËÙµç×ÓÓʾ֣¡

Marko Mlinar

• 2002-01-23 07:04 ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-24 01:22 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-24 23:56 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-25 00:01 loop optimizations

Martin Kahlert

• 2002-01-02 06:58 No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-03 23:17 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7
• 2002-01-07 05:26 Is there a Problem with -g on mainline (470MB for a 7MB executable)?
• 2002-01-07 05:34 Re: Is there a Problem with -g on mainline (470MB for a 7MB executable)?

Martin York

• 2002-01-28 17:18 Install gcc

Massimiliano Cialdi

• 2002-01-16 01:17 little problems with gcc 3.0.3
• 2002-01-21 07:52 static initialization of an array
• 2002-01-21 08:00 static initialization of an array

Matthias Benkmann

• 2002-01-10 02:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Matthias Klose

• 2002-01-28 04:13 bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127

Max Okumoto

• 2002-01-16 13:20 Script for checking copyrights in gcc tree

mgowan

• 2002-01-10 06:44 va_arg question

Michael Hayes

• 2002-01-10 04:05 Bitset statistics
• 2002-01-10 16:10 Re: Bitset statistics

Michael Matz

• 2002-01-28 11:37 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 12:47 Re: paradoxical subreg problem

Michael Snyder

• 2002-01-23 18:27 Re: Help needed with sparc

Mike Liford

• 2002-01-24 06:19 GCC Installation Problem

mike stump

• 2002-01-02 17:13 Re: DWARF broken?
• 2002-01-02 17:26 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-02 19:08 Re: The gnu linker.
• 2002-01-03 22:20 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 18:36 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 18:56 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 15:50 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-05 15:59 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 16:02 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 16:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 17:48 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 19:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 22:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 23:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 23:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 23:57 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 10:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 10:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 10:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 10:00 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-07 10:39 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 11:12 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-07 11:20 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 11:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 14:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 14:57 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 15:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 16:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 16:29 Re: Unused but documented target macros
• 2002-01-08 16:49 Re: "make distclean"...
• 2002-01-08 17:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 11:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-16 07:23 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-16 08:45 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 18:53 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 19:08 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 19:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-18 11:55 Re: Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted
• 2002-01-21 12:59 Re: constructor calling order
• 2002-01-22 11:18 Re: Loop oddity
• 2002-01-23 12:59 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-23 14:41 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-24 09:52 Re: g++ compiler
• 2002-01-24 10:26 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-24 11:30 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-24 16:52 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-25 11:13 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 11:38 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 13:50 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 17:32 ppc question for altivec
• 2002-01-29 17:53 Re: mips structure padding
• 2002-01-30 14:25 RE: mips structure padding
• 2002-01-30 15:08 write permission comparison with Linux
• 2002-01-30 18:00 Re: which GCC version old or new?

Momchil Velikov

• 2002-01-01 15:03 [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-01 22:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 02:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 03:09 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 03:11 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

N V Krishna

• 2002-01-10 08:33 type casting
• 2002-01-13 20:10 Re: regarding tree format.

Nathanael Nerode

• 2002-01-03 05:22 autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-25 13:41 want to fill out copyright assignment for gcc
• 2002-01-25 13:57 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-29 21:06 autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage
• 2002-01-29 23:29 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage
• 2002-01-30 11:06 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage

Naveen Sharma

• 2002-01-10 23:36 RE: NON_OPTIMAL CODE GENERATED FOR SH4

naveens

• 2002-01-10 23:27 NON_OPTIMAL CODE GENERATED FOR SH4

Neil Booth

• 2002-01-03 12:43 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 13:30 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 14:09 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 14:27 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 14:52 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 15:11 ChangeLog rotation
• 2002-01-03 15:48 Re: ChangeLog rotation
• 2002-01-10 14:20 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-15 10:42 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-15 16:21 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-16 13:22 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 14:27 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-20 23:11 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-22 14:10 DECL_ALIGN
• 2002-01-22 15:28 Re: DECL_ALIGN
• 2002-01-23 10:36 Re: GCC >= 3 problems
• 2002-01-23 13:15 Severe Tire Damage
• 2002-01-24 15:08 Re: What does assembly-time constant mean?
• 2002-01-25 14:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-28 14:59 Re: Problems building cross compiler on NT
• 2002-01-31 23:59 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code

Nicholas Adrian Vinen

• 2002-01-31 05:53 GCC 3.0.3 produces large code
• 2002-01-31 08:26 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code
• 2002-01-31 22:16 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code

Nick Clifton

• 2002-01-15 09:14 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-17 15:49 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-18 11:21 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-18 11:27 Re: QNX Port

Nielsen Linus (ext)

• 2002-01-25 07:30 PDF manual files
• 2002-01-25 07:33 I meant PostScript manual files

Nirmit Vikrambhai Desai

• 2002-01-07 13:54 Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2
• 2002-01-07 14:16 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2

Nix

• 2002-01-29 15:00 Re: 2nd problem

Nuotio Mikko

• 2002-01-08 07:27 program compiled with GCC

Old Friend

• 2002-01-02 04:06 Hello
• 2002-01-02 04:14 Hello

Olenin, Vladimir

• 2002-01-23 12:01 libc core dump
• 2002-01-23 12:27 --enable-threads flag in precompiled gcc
• 2002-01-24 09:36 strlen and atoi coredumps

Osku Salerma

• 2002-01-18 11:37 Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted
• 2002-01-19 04:02 Re: Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted

Osman Bineev

• 2002-01-10 22:39 GCC Porting beginner

P S Suresh

• 2002-01-14 02:33 Installation error on AIX 4.3.3
• 2002-01-14 02:33 Installation error on AIX 4.3.3
• 2002-01-15 03:46 gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem
• 2002-01-16 20:23 Problem creating shared object with gcc on AIX 4.3.3

Paolo Carlini

• 2002-01-04 07:16 Re: C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings
• 2002-01-16 08:04 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 09:22 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 11:42 Fix 3272 and 5181 in the branch? (was: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?)
• 2002-01-16 12:18 Re: Fix 3272 and 5181 in the branch? (was: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?)
• 2002-01-17 12:43 Re: gnu assembler question
• 2002-01-20 12:49 Re: Two-stage lookup for templates in 3.1?
• 2002-01-23 05:35 Re: GCC >= 3 problems
• 2002-01-24 14:32 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 00:39 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 02:30 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:53 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 09:56 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 11:45 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 11:53 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 16:03 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-27 09:12 Re: Please help baby C programmer...
• 2002-01-27 09:59 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-31 01:38 PCH status??
• 2002-01-31 15:31 Re: PR 5304 is still broken in gcc-20020128

Patrick Hartling

• 2002-01-28 07:44 Successful build of GCC 3.0.3

Paul Cockayne

• 2002-01-10 15:04 spam mail

Paul Koning

• 2002-01-02 08:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 10:29 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-04 09:32 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 14:26 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 14:53 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-04 14:56 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-04 15:03 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 08:18 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-05 08:25 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-05 08:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 09:22 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-05 10:58 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-06 08:39 Re: build status for cross builds?
• 2002-01-09 07:46 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 12:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 13:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 14:35 __builtin_prefetch
• 2002-01-15 14:14 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem
• 2002-01-15 14:14 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-16 07:36 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-16 07:36 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 08:03 Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 10:12 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-16 13:56 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 08:19 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-18 08:42 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-22 11:12 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-28 07:50 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-29 13:58 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-31 08:18 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?

Paul Mackerras

• 2002-01-02 15:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:16 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 18:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 18:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 19:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 02:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 02:50 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 15:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 16:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 20:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 21:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 21:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 14:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 14:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 16:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Pavel Machek

• 2002-01-04 00:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Pavel Roskin

• 2002-01-08 15:31 Symbol table lookup at the run time
• 2002-01-08 16:45 Re: Symbol table lookup at the run time

Per Bothner

• 2002-01-02 14:05 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 14:51 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:23 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-14 14:51 debugging dwarf2 info
• 2002-01-24 14:09 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-29 21:30 Re: Developing a Once-install and throw-away-CD mechanism

Peter Barada

• 2002-01-02 13:57 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 10:12 Bug in gcc-20011231
• 2002-01-03 11:58 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 12:09 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-03 12:21 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-04 08:01 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-04 11:34 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231
• 2002-01-04 12:13 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231
• 2002-01-04 13:28 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231
• 2002-01-09 16:19 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 07:30 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-14 13:33 Have run out of space in CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P
• 2002-01-16 13:08 issues trying to add ColdFire v4e FPU support to gcc-20020107
• 2002-01-16 15:27 Re: issues trying to add ColdFire v4e FPU support to gcc-20020107
• 2002-01-18 07:30 Re: ColdFire v4e FPU addressing problems
• 2002-01-21 12:30 Bug in gcc-20020114: m68k doesn't use tstsf/tstdf patterns
• 2002-01-31 15:23 PR 5304 is still broken in gcc-20020128

Peter Schmid

• 2002-01-21 13:12 [Fortran] Lapack test suite results for i686-pc-linux-gnu on themain line (regressions)

Petr Vandrovec

• 2002-01-28 04:24 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Phil Blundell

• 2002-01-16 02:02 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-17 10:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-25 02:04 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale
• 2002-01-25 02:42 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX?
• 2002-01-25 04:35 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX?
• 2002-01-25 07:30 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale
• 2002-01-28 01:56 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-29 02:44 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?

Phil Edwards

• 2002-01-02 14:19 Re: Why are we overusing the preprocessor?
• 2002-01-02 19:28 Re: Project proposal
• 2002-01-02 20:42 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-02 22:19 Solving the in-source build problem. Permanently.
• 2002-01-03 11:28 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-04 14:04 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com
• 2002-01-30 00:20 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage

Philip Blundell

• 2002-01-19 11:29 Re: termios.h for arm-elf-gcc?

Philipp Schieferdecker

• 2002-01-11 01:36 two compiler versions

Philipp Thomas

• 2002-01-29 02:03 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions

pi

• 2002-01-07 12:44 gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link

po_owen

• 2002-01-30 17:20 Ïðåäëîæåíèå îò ÏÎ "ÎÂÅÍ"

POLONIA-CENTER

• 2002-01-16 15:18 POLONIA-CENTER
• 2002-01-16 15:18 POLONIA-CENTER

Prof. A Olowofoyeku (The African Chief)

• 2002-01-09 03:03 Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin

Raghavendra M

• 2002-01-10 03:03 ia64

Rainer Orth

• 2002-01-17 03:03 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments

Rani Sharoni

• 2002-01-12 06:34 Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin

rashmi kankaria

• 2002-01-13 01:04 regarding tree format.

ratnadeep joshi

• 2002-01-12 07:15 makefiles in gcc
• 2002-01-12 07:20 bootstarp and cpp
• 2002-01-27 01:12 c anc c++ compiling

Rauf hassan

• 2002-01-04 04:16 Cross compiler problem

Rayson Ho

• 2002-01-07 08:28 long double (128-bit) support

recycledparts@lycos.co.uk

• 2002-01-12 06:13 Parts
• 2002-01-12 06:13 Parts

Reichelt

• 2002-01-22 03:31 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-22 04:58 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.

Rekha Deshmukh

• 2002-01-29 01:57 ICE on h8300-hms target

remero

• 2002-01-28 15:52 new photos from my party!

renato cm figueiredo

• 2002-01-20 07:24 Cuidado com o BPI
• 2002-01-20 07:24 Cuidado com o BPI

Rene Rebe

• 2002-01-20 16:26 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips

Reva Cuthbertson

• 2002-01-22 17:19 Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc
• 2002-01-22 17:42 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc

Richard B. Kreckel

• 2002-01-20 06:04 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-28 04:32 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64

Richard Earnshaw

• 2002-01-09 02:57 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-09 03:09 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-10 02:45 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-17 08:42 Re: function inlining in ARM/Thumb
• 2002-01-18 02:24 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-18 02:37 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc
• 2002-01-19 03:11 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-19 03:42 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order
• 2002-01-25 03:04 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale
• 2002-01-25 03:06 Re: ldreqd instruction in arm version 4?
• 2002-01-25 03:10 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale
• 2002-01-28 10:17 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config.gcc config/netbsd-aou ...
• 2002-01-29 05:07 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-29 05:13 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-29 09:14 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]
• 2002-01-30 03:32 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-30 03:36 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-31 04:04 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars

Richard Henderson

• 2002-01-01 15:26 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-01 16:08 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-01 16:33 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-02 13:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 13:40 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 14:26 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 14:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 14:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:01 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:14 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:55 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 16:08 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 17:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 00:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-03 13:17 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-03 17:52 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-03 21:19 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-04 00:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:06 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 14:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 15:15 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-04 15:17 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-04 15:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 15:53 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 18:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 18:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-04 18:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 10:50 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 11:26 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-05 11:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-05 19:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 16:17 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-06 16:24 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-06 17:20 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-06 17:50 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 10:36 Re: Scheduling of asm()
• 2002-01-07 14:52 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi
• 2002-01-07 15:34 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-07 17:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-08 16:04 rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-09 02:59 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers
• 2002-01-09 12:20 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 12:23 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-09 12:31 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-09 14:24 Re: [G95-develop] Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE)
• 2002-01-09 16:35 Re: __builtin_prefetch
• 2002-01-10 11:28 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 12:54 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 13:36 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-10 15:25 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-11 02:10 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon?
• 2002-01-11 02:11 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon?
• 2002-01-11 10:08 Re: possible problem in i386.h?
• 2002-01-11 10:21 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question
• 2002-01-11 10:24 Re: Status of SSE/SSE2 builtins on ia32
• 2002-01-11 13:53 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question
• 2002-01-11 18:03 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question
• 2002-01-14 12:42 Re: ffs?
• 2002-01-14 12:56 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-14 13:00 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 15:31 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 16:15 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 16:32 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 16:40 Re: Have run out of space in CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P
• 2002-01-14 17:02 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-15 11:49 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-16 10:26 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-16 10:30 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-21 10:58 Re: issues trying to add ColdFire v4e FPU support to gcc-20020107
• 2002-01-21 16:50 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-22 10:09 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work
• 2002-01-22 13:31 Re: [testcase] ia64 retaddr elimination failure
• 2002-01-22 15:09 Re: DECL_ALIGN
• 2002-01-22 15:34 Re: DECL_ALIGN
• 2002-01-23 11:08 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc
• 2002-01-23 17:56 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 21:36 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-23 22:01 Re: mips64 inline question
• 2002-01-24 16:51 Re: Help needed with sparc
• 2002-01-24 17:01 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-24 17:06 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core
• 2002-01-24 18:51 Re: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-24 19:36 Re: New x86 target
• 2002-01-25 16:39 Re: sparc.c bogus comparison
• 2002-01-25 16:41 Re: loop optimizations
• 2002-01-28 09:59 Re: Java & aliasing question
• 2002-01-28 10:39 Re: bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127
• 2002-01-28 10:43 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-28 10:51 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:23 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:50 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 12:15 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 22:02 Re: Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it?
• 2002-01-28 22:12 Re: Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it?
• 2002-01-29 13:46 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-29 14:04 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-29 15:49 Re: Static variable addressing
• 2002-01-30 17:02 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
• 2002-01-30 17:07 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 17:13 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars

Richard Jackson

• 2002-01-30 11:22 successful GCC 3.0.3 alphaev5-dec-osf4.0g build

Richard Kenner

• 2002-01-10 04:59 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-11 04:13 Re: A blast from the past
• 2002-01-11 04:17 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available
• 2002-01-14 12:56 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd)
• 2002-01-16 18:28 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists?
• 2002-01-17 02:58 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 03:01 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-20 13:33 Issues with limbo DIEs in dwarf2out.c
• 2002-01-22 11:12 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-24 14:35 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 14:45 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-24 17:45 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-24 17:56 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-24 17:57 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 04:31 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 05:14 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 05:46 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 06:34 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 06:36 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:32 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 08:33 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 12:05 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 12:28 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 14:47 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 16:04 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-25 18:48 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-26 03:46 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-27 04:34 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken
• 2002-01-28 11:06 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 11:40 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 12:03 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 12:18 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-28 13:18 Re: paradoxical subreg problem
• 2002-01-29 09:06 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]
• 2002-01-31 04:13 Bootstrap failure on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1
• 2002-01-31 10:20 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ]

Richard Sandiford

• 2002-01-16 01:31 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error

Robert Boehne

• 2002-01-14 08:02 Plans for 3.0.4 ?
• 2002-01-16 08:41 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem

Robert Collins

• 2002-01-31 00:49 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin?

Robert Dewar

• 2002-01-19 05:01 Re: QNX Port
• 2002-01-25 07:05 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 07:17 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:05 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:11 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:38 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 08:39 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:53 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 08:54 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-25 08:59 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 09:28 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 10:00 Re: Aliasing fun
• 2002-01-25 11:53 Re: g++ and aliasing bools
• 2002-01-26 01:58 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken

Robert Lipe

• 2002-01-02 20:39 Re: DWARF broken?
• 2002-01-04 19:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-16 13:49 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-24 11:11 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-24 19:39 Re: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-25 08:09 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-31 14:49 Re: Sparc bogosity
• 2002-01-31 15:26 Re: Sparc bogosity

Robin Sonefors

• 2002-01-12 05:38 RedHat

Rod Chapman

• 2002-01-09 04:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.

• 2002-01-02 08:58 exception support in gcc-3.0.3
• 2002-01-03 06:59 passwords for exceptions.pdf
• 2002-01-16 16:29 two constructor copies in object file

Roger P

• 2002-01-10 11:39 cos?

Roman Zippel

• 2002-01-04 19:31 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-12 06:27 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++
• 2002-01-28 04:58 Re: bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127

Ron Hudson

• 2002-01-27 08:59 Please help baby C programmer...

root

• 2002-01-05 09:17 problem installation with zlib

Ross Smith

• 2002-01-24 21:11 Re: errno values: poll
• 2002-01-27 13:17 Re: errno values: poll

Rupert Wood

• 2002-01-03 03:13 RE: problems building cross compilers
• 2002-01-07 05:30 RE: Help wanted on GCC port
• 2002-01-14 02:43 RE: Installation error on AIX 4.3.3
• 2002-01-28 02:08 RE: Developing a Once-install and throw-away-CD mechanism

Russ Allbery

• 2002-01-01 20:30 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin
• 2002-01-04 20:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-13 18:17 Re: Web headers

S. Bosscher

• 2002-01-06 14:14 RE: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR

Sandra Manton

• 2002-01-11 06:06 Millions of Movies and Pictures? I know how...

sanwa

• 2002-01-14 14:11 $B$*855$$G$9$+(B
• 2002-01-14 14:11 $B$*855$$G$9$+(B

Schirmer, Hartmut

• 2002-01-16 00:55 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes

schneckchen@brisant-mail.com

• 2002-01-13 15:44 Ich bin's
• 2002-01-13 15:44 Ich bin's

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2002-01-27 05:57 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-27 20:34 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64

Sebastian Pop

• 2002-01-25 05:01 Re: Access to symbol table from within a program

Sergey Ostrovsky

• 2002-01-03 05:21 Re: Simple question.

Sinisa Milivojevic

• 2002-01-15 09:18 .NET Managed Extensions
• 2002-01-16 05:38 Re: .NET Managed Extensions

Sir Ace

• 2002-01-02 15:06 Simple question.
• 2002-01-02 17:34 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-02 18:37 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-08 19:11 Re: Simple question.
• 2002-01-14 00:12 2nd problem
• 2002-01-14 10:53 Re: 2nd problem
• 2002-01-14 18:17 Re: 2nd problem

snodx

• 2002-01-15 23:07 LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX
• 2002-01-16 22:12 Re: LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX
• 2002-01-28 01:22 Developing a Once-install and throw-away-CD mechanism

stacie2180655

• 2002-01-26 16:37 Come Join The Fun

Stan Shebs

• 2002-01-06 10:22 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 10:30 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 10:33 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-06 12:02 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-07 15:08 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi
• 2002-01-07 15:21 Re: Unused but documented target macros
• 2002-01-16 14:34 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 14:09 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 19:54 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments

Steffen Rohr

• 2002-01-08 09:20 Take mirror: ftp.fh-worms.de

Stephano Mariani

• 2002-01-08 14:07 RE: program compiled with GCC
• 2002-01-27 03:45 RE: c anc c++ compiling
• 2002-01-27 09:11 RE: Please help baby C programmer...

steve b

• 2002-01-08 18:55 Need Forms

Steve Christiansen

• 2002-01-03 17:04 successful 3.0.3 bootstrap on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2002-01-24 21:24 Re: Problems debugging on irix

Steve Ellcey

• 2002-01-09 16:51 CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-10 09:03 Re: CSE optimization question
• 2002-01-11 15:35 Re: libtool in binutils question

Steve Marotta

• 2002-01-23 05:09 GCC >= 3 problems

steven blakeslee

• 2002-01-06 07:06 gcc question

Steven Bosscher

• 2002-01-03 15:25 SIMPLE
• 2002-01-04 16:05 Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE)
• 2002-01-09 12:42 Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE)
• 2002-01-09 12:55 Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE)
• 2002-01-15 16:41 Re: .NET Managed Extensions
• 2002-01-15 16:45 Re: .NET Managed Extensions

Steven J. Hill

• 2002-01-10 18:41 Difficulty building stage 1 MIPS cross compiler from CVS...

stevenzg

• 2002-01-25 15:48 gcc-3.0.3 build success

Sudam Roy

• 2002-01-13 08:44 FORTRA N 77 SOFTWARE

Suphi Cenk Agar

• 2002-01-30 05:29 Run time error on Sol8 x86

Sven C. Koehler

• 2002-01-11 05:08 gcov and C++'s global destructors
• 2002-01-12 07:49 Re: gcov and C++'s global destructors

T X

• 2002-01-21 08:44 Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin

Takis Psarogiannakopoulos

• 2002-01-23 08:33 GCC 3.0.3 Question
• 2002-01-30 09:07 BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava
• 2002-01-30 19:23 RE:Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava
• 2002-01-31 09:51 Re:Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava

Tapani Tarvainen

• 2002-01-02 06:49 gcc 3.0.3 in HP-UX 11.11: success report

Theodore Tso

• 2002-01-07 13:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Tim Hollebeek

• 2002-01-03 14:20 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-07 14:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-09 20:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-10 12:11 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-25 13:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools

Tim McDaniel

• 2002-01-07 14:26 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Tim Prince

• 2002-01-10 20:25 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon?
• 2002-01-10 20:52 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon?
• 2002-01-16 20:02 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-18 08:02 Re: GCC Output
• 2002-01-27 16:28 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-27 16:28 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-27 16:28 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-28 05:59 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark
• 2002-01-30 08:14 Re: Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed
• 2002-01-31 11:21 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin?

Timothy J. Wood

• 2002-01-07 00:44 Error building cross compiler from mainline
• 2002-01-14 16:54 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-14 20:07 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error
• 2002-01-31 13:44 Re: PCH status??

Todd Malsbary

• 2002-01-28 18:05 mips structure padding
• 2002-01-30 13:28 RE: mips structure padding
• 2002-01-31 09:44 RE: mips structure padding

Tom Crispin

• 2002-01-04 11:09 re: Bug in gcc-20011231
• 2002-01-04 13:10 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231
• 2002-01-11 09:04 x86 optimization and rtx_cost question
• 2002-01-11 13:43 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question
• 2002-01-11 16:43 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question
• 2002-01-16 17:15 success building 3.0.1 and failure with 3.0.3; and some questions
• 2002-01-17 12:29 successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch
• 2002-01-17 12:39 gnu assembler question
• 2002-01-18 15:38 Re: successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch
• 2002-01-22 09:45 Re: Loop oddity
• 2002-01-22 12:57 Re: Loop oddity
• 2002-01-23 15:36 problems building GCC

Tom Fetterer

• 2002-01-14 08:02 g++

Tom Lord

• 2002-01-15 22:27 arch (revision control system)
• 2002-01-18 12:29 arch lists

Tom Rini

• 2002-01-01 15:44 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 07:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 07:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 11:09 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 12:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 14:06 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 14:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 14:50 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 15:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 16:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 17:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-02 20:32 Re: C undefined behavior fix
• 2002-01-06 16:10 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Tom Tromey

• 2002-01-02 07:00 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h
• 2002-01-02 07:58 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h
• 2002-01-02 13:34 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:21 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-03 12:34 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-03 19:37 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-03 19:44 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-04 08:26 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-04 10:40 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin
• 2002-01-23 15:34 Re: GCJ: Java generics ala Sun JDK1.5
• 2002-01-24 08:36 Re: libjava does not build
• 2002-01-24 17:13 question about gcj -fjni code
• 2002-01-24 17:58 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-24 18:30 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-26 18:35 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86
• 2002-01-30 13:30 Re: Gcj Errors
• 2002-01-31 19:13 Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava

tomas szepe

• 2002-01-11 04:30 Successful build report

Tommy Dugandzic

• 2002-01-31 13:09 Grammatical errors.
• 2002-01-31 13:59 Typo.
• 2002-01-31 14:05 Typo.

TonerPlus Specials

• 2002-01-07 17:13 AMAZING NEW YEAR SPECIALS!

Tony Kou

• 2002-01-15 11:29 urgent help needed: testsuite related

Toon Moene

• 2002-01-01 11:40 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-01 12:04 [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-01 14:56 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-02 15:09 Re: Report of successful build
• 2002-01-02 15:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 15:24 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 16:05 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-02 17:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
• 2002-01-05 03:23 Re: Arraysizes in g77
• 2002-01-05 03:30 Re: Arraysizes in g77
• 2002-01-15 15:32 Re: FORTRA N 77 SOFTWARE
• 2002-01-17 13:56 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-17 15:01 Re: POLONIA-CENTER
• 2002-01-17 15:02 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-17 15:04 Re: about g77
• 2002-01-17 15:16 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-18 12:00 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-18 13:23 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-20 11:57 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-20 11:58 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
• 2002-01-21 11:42 Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-25 16:11 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-27 06:12 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-27 06:45 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-29 08:00 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-30 00:36 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.
• 2002-01-30 04:22 Correct comparison to the intrinsics table, was: Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1.

Trent Nelson

• 2002-01-03 19:00 Re: Major debugging breakage

Ulrich Staerk

• 2002-01-04 14:13 Old libstdc++-2.7.2

Ulrich Weigand

• 2002-01-07 11:58 libcall CSE, simplify_unary_operation, and (zero_extend (const_int))
• 2002-01-14 07:46 Bug in tidy_fallthru_edges ?
• 2002-01-14 07:56 Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-14 09:51 Re: Bug in tidy_fallthru_edges ?
• 2002-01-14 13:05 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-15 11:41 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-16 06:08 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-16 10:49 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ...
• 2002-01-19 09:50 Standards question: va_list vs. va_list *
• 2002-01-20 11:37 Re: Standards question: va_list vs. va_list *
• 2002-01-30 13:43 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 15:18 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-30 16:36 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
• 2002-01-31 14:54 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars

urstrully

• 2002-01-25 23:59 CUM see the hottest bitches on the net...for pennies
• 2002-01-25 23:59 CUM see the hottest bitches on the net...for pennies

Van Snyder

• 2002-01-17 12:14 dwarf2out
• 2002-01-17 12:14 dwarf2out

Vijay Velusamy

• 2002-01-07 21:26 Can't size warning

Vince Lewis

• 2002-01-29 04:30 Build for Windows CE ?

wang Allen

• 2002-01-16 19:03 about g77

Warren Gaspar

• 2002-01-21 06:57 Build Status for GCC 3.0

Wheeler, Fred (CRD)

• 2002-01-16 15:22 g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2002-01-02 00:10 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff

Yang Wang

• 2002-01-10 17:33 Successful: gcc 3.0.3 on SuSE 7.1

Yildiz, Murat

• 2002-01-24 07:34 gcc on Reliant unix (siemens)

YourPal21

• 2002-01-18 12:42 Hey there

Zack Weinberg

• 2002-01-01 11:11 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin
• 2002-01-01 11:12 Re: bugs fixed in 3.0.3 -- second draft
• 2002-01-01 11:21 Re: cp/decl.c
• 2002-01-01 11:31 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff
• 2002-01-01 12:18 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin
• 2002-01-01 12:53 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin
• 2002-01-03 11:47 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
• 2002-01-03 19:51 Re: Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-08 11:09 "make distclean"...
• 2002-01-08 15:12 Re: Defined but unused target macros
• 2002-01-08 16:05 Re: Symbol table lookup at the run time
• 2002-01-09 10:09 Re: egcs/gcc ChangeLog Makefile.in config.in confi ...
• 2002-01-10 13:59 Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-10 14:26 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-10 15:39 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc
• 2002-01-11 16:35 Re: libtool in binutils question
• 2002-01-13 13:55 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage
• 2002-01-13 14:34 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-14 13:05 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-14 13:37 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-14 15:12 Re: debugging dwarf2 info
• 2002-01-15 02:18 Re: Web headers
• 2002-01-15 09:40 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions
• 2002-01-16 12:19 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-16 13:22 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
• 2002-01-20 20:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-20 22:40 Re: RTL creation
• 2002-01-21 01:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-21 09:04 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-21 09:34 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4
• 2002-01-22 16:56 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-23 00:07 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-23 10:08 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"?
• 2002-01-24 09:34 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h
• 2002-01-24 18:47 errno values: poll
• 2002-01-28 08:14 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions
• 2002-01-28 15:21 Re: Problems building cross compiler on NT
• 2002-01-30 11:23 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage
• 2002-01-31 08:56 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code

zackw

• 2002-01-05 09:21 May an implementation document implementation-defined behavior as undefined? (fwd)

zhuhai newspaper

• 2002-01-20 08:08 ¡¶Ö麣ÌØÇø±¨¡·Éç¹ã¸æÖÐÐÄ

Zoltan Hidvegi

• 2002-01-02 17:55 Re: vortex peak performance regression

ÑÎÍÎÐÀ

• 2002-01-12 07:02 Ïðèãëàøåíèå

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)