This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: paradoxical subreg problem
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:03:20PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> However, even if we do that I think we need to clarify precisely what
> the semantics of a paradoxical subreg really are. Clearly there is
> some confusion.
With plain registers, I don't think there is any confusion -- the
upper bits are simply undefined. With memories, there is confusion.
But I think we should "clarify" by disallowing them.
> [ Actually my preference would be to zap paradoxical subregs, but I
> don't think we're in a position to do that right now. ]
Nope.
r~