This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
- From: "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel at ginac dot de>
- To: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:04:01 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
- Reply-to: Richard dot Kreckel at Uni-Mainz dot DE
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > What (if any) are the plans for a 3.0.4 release of gcc?
>
> I've been deliberately noncommittal, but it's time to commit, I guess.
>
> So, this is a poll: how many people feel that a 3.0.4 release
> would be valuable?
Well, I would definitely appreciate one.
Oh, and I would even more appreciate one which reverts this:
> Mon Jul 16 19:57:19 2001 Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>
> * config/alpha/osf.h (ASM_OUTPUT_WEAK_ALIAS, ASM_WEAKEN_LABEL,
> HANDLE_SYSV_PRAGMA): Define.
> * mips-tfile.c (add_ext_symbol): Pass complete symbol ptr, inline
> previous args.
> (copy_object): Caller changed.
>
> testsuite:
> * g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static3.C: Removed alpha*-*-osf* XFAIL.
> g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static6.C: Likewise.
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_weak_available): alpha*-*-osf*
> supports weak symbols.
We still get complaints from people that CLN [*] does not compile on Tru64
5.1 and I have repeatedly pointed out that this is due to above patch
which showed up in the 3.0.1 release -- without ever getting any response
from the author. Maybe that patch is just broken or incomplete?
Regards
-richy.
[*] <http://www.gnu.org/directory/CLN.html>
--
Richard B. Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>