This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>
Cc: avbidder at acter dot ch, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:04:12 -0800
Subject: Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
References: <1012232648.2879.2.camel@atlas> <20020128104253.C25844@redhat.com> <1012299865.1044.0.camel@atlas> <20020129134615.A8074@redhat.com> <15447.6892.300000.435546@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:58:04PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> Would this make a good target-dependent item?  I know of one target
> where branches taken are definitely better than not-taken: the 68040.

We don't currently have anything that you can tweek to
control this.


r~

References:
- ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
  - From: Adrian von Bidder
- Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
  - From: Adrian von Bidder
- Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps?
  - From: Paul Koning

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]