This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi


"Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
> 
> Any comments on the idea of getting rid of the generic comments from the
> definitions of the target macros, leaving only useful comments about the
> definition on a particular system?

Absolutely yes.  If any of cookie-cutter comments are still accurate,
it's by sheer inertia.  There was a theory at one point that machine
descriptions would be created from templates, and the comments were
supposed to guide the porter in whether to uncomment a definition
and/or alter it.  But in the absence of any sort of automatic
update mechanism, it was just a matter of months before the template
derived descriptions included out-of-date info.

Stan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]