This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:26:23 -0800
Subject: Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
References: <20020102133052.A26708@tornado.cygnus.com> <87zo3wqvd7.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20020102134006.D10362@redhat.com> <3C33842B.50204@bothner.com>

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:05:31PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
> Perhaps not, but for most of the other _STMT nodes it is perfectly
> reasonable to use them as expressions, and there are existing
> languages out there where such forms *are* expressions, including
> most languages in the Lisp family.

I don't care.  For the purposes of the language-independant
tree nodes, expressions shall have no side effects.  Transfer
of control is a side effect, and thus shall be a statement.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]