This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Scheduling of asm()
Excerpt of message (sent 4 January 2002) by Richard Henderson:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:55:52PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > Supplying the schedule class seems like the right answer..
> Until you consider how much compiler internals that exposes
> to the user's source code, at which point we can't reasonably
> change anything in the backend any more.
Isn't the same true already? You're allowed to refer to
target-specific operand letters in the asm statement. It's arguable
whether those are any less an internal detail than the names of the