This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:26:40 -0500
Subject: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
References: <3C430109.B7F58B7B@ricardo-us.com> <61170000.1011164839@warlock.codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:07:19PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
> So, this is a poll: how many people feel that a 3.0.4 release
> would be valuable?

I didn't know that a 3.0.4 release was coming, because
I did not see it mentioned in the Development Plan:
http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html

Consequently, I haven't been checking any fixes onto branch, 
just mainline.

If we release 3.0.4 we should:
- make a list of bugs that should be fixed for 3.0.4, preferably
  referenced by PR, such as PR 4122.

  Does PR 3145.patch, which affects KDE, now qualify for 3.0.4?

- figure out what changes from 3.0.3 need to be merged from
  mainline, if any
- in the 3.0.4 release announcement, mention what bugs have been
  fixed since 3.0.3 (encourage people to reference PR's fixed 
  in the ChangeLog)
-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
rodrigc@mediaone.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Plans for 3.0.4 ?
  - From: Robert Boehne
- Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]