This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark



The rather biased article on http://www.open-mag.com/754088105111.htm
compares Intel's C++ favourably to GCC, without disclosing many
enlightening details.

I'm not concerned with that but with the notable OS difference
between Linux (SuSE 7.3) and Windows (XP Pro). IMHO a CPU bound
benchmark should see less than 1 % influence from OS and C library.
The graphics shows roughly 7% better performance on Windows for the
same (Intel) compiler.

Are there any ABI differences which would justify such a difference?
Register use conventions? Other stuff that you could identify?

Unfortunately the benchmark gives no details about compiler options,
so presumably the answer is `the benchmark is flawed' and `go ask
them'. In this case don't bother to answer.

Claus

-- 
Claus Fischer <claus.fischer@clausfischer.com>
http://www.clausfischer.com/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]