This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
SIMPLE
- From: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: GNU Fortran 95 development-mailing-list <g95-develop at lists dot sourceforge dot net>
- Date: 04 Jan 2002 00:24:16 +0100
- Subject: SIMPLE
Op wo 02-01-2002, om 13:30 schreef Diego Novillo:
> I'm about to start incorporating these things into the AST
> branch.
Does this mean that the decision has been made to go with SIMPLE?
How does SIMPLE deal with typedefs/structs/classes? Will declarations
be similair to/the same as those available in the C-family front ends?
I had some discussion about SIMPLE with Andy Vaught on g95-develop.
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/3588/0/
G95 is getting closer to producing fully parsed, fully resolved g95_code
trees (G95 ast). The next project is coding a translation pass from
g95_code to GCC 'tree' structures (including scalarizing). But obviously
we prefer to know what GCC's new high-level IR will look like before we
start coding.
Op do 03-01-2002, om 22:34 schreef Andrew Vaught:
> Are you sure the GCC people are committed to using SIMPLE? Or rather,
> does the steering committee have to vote, or does it just take
> convincing one person of this? My reading of the list looked like
> people were discussing pros and cons.
I'd like to an answer to these questions as well, if available, and a
timeframe, and documentation, and ...
(of course I'm willing to help :-)
Greetz
Steven