This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: mrs at windriver dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 02 05:53:45 EST
- Subject: Re: Remaining host configuration fragments
A gcc that only supports 6 platforms, and nothing else isn't what we
should sign up for. This would be bad. Making a decision that
ultimately results in this outcome, is also bad and I am against it.
I agree.
The major point of GCC is its diversity: that it runs on every machine.
Agressively removing targets would greatly diminish that.
Bitrotting is fine. Everything bitrots. It is a natural state of
affairs. As the code matures, the incident rate of bitrotting should
decrease. A slightly bitrotted port is usually fairly easy to get
going again.
Agreed.
IBM-RT I think is finally dead. Quick, bonus points if someone can
even name the chip in it. Kenner, you don't get to play (I think you
wrote it).
I did. Not only that, I still use the machine every day, though I don't
use GCC or any other development tool on it.
Likewise any OS that hasn't had a new release in 5 years. These are
likely to not be worthwhile to preserve.
Maybe yes, maybe no. People still use old machines.