gcc archive
author index for November, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Alleged Judas

• 2003-11-08 21:26 Re: Static inline functions disappearing in new port (fixed)

Danny Smith

• 2003-11-10 09:26 RE: Failure to build gnatlib and tools on cygwin: sysdep.c: In function `getc_immediate_common': sysdep.c:356: error: storage size of 'otermios_rec' isn't known

Etienne Lorrain

• 2003-11-03 14:45 i386 GCC-3.4 & Mandrake-9.2 GCC-3.3.1 non-inline memset/memcpy
• 2003-11-04 10:43 Re: i386 GCC-3.4 & Mandrake-9.2 GCC-3.3.1 non-inline memset/memcpy
• 2003-11-04 22:51 Re: i386 GCC-3.4 & Mandrake-9.2 GCC-3.3.1 non-inline memset/memcpy

Michael Sögtrop

• 2003-11-22 16:50 __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing

Peter T. Bense

• 2003-11-27 08:35 help compiling gcc with -mtune=c3-2

Rama Singh

• 2003-11-14 08:13 Macro Labels in local scope: Works with g++ but breaks with gcc

Michael Sogtrop

• 2003-11-23 09:00 AW: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing

Branko Äibej

• 2003-11-23 22:13 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Adrian Bellomo

• 2003-11-26 03:28 Mailing List Question

Aitor Garcia

• 2003-11-28 09:38 help with gcc-3.3.2 for ARM

Alan Modra

• 2003-11-27 04:23 PCH bit me
• 2003-11-27 05:25 Re: PCH bit me
• 2003-11-29 01:42 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-29 03:05 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-29 06:47 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?

Albert Chin-A-Young

• 2003-11-20 19:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Alex Rosenberg

• 2003-11-08 03:28 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-11-20 04:22 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily

Amol Lad

• 2003-11-29 11:28 arm-elf-gcc and nobits section

Anders Fugmann

• 2003-11-25 19:58 __builtin_expect usage and g++

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-11-02 17:00 Re: sizeof(long double) increased from 12 to 16
• 2003-11-14 14:01 Ada is still broken on AMD64 and IA64 (Was: Re: Ada config forx86_64-linux)
• 2003-11-14 15:07 Re: Ada is still broken on AMD64 and IA64
• 2003-11-15 19:55 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145:error: overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-19 14:31 Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-19 20:33 Re: Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-21 09:42 Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change
• 2003-11-21 17:36 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange
• 2003-11-21 20:11 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange
• 2003-11-21 21:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange
• 2003-11-30 16:10 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICEin stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb

Andreas Krebbel

• 2003-11-05 08:27 Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling
• 2003-11-11 09:28 Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling
• 2003-11-13 13:34 Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-11-07 15:54 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 20:42 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:29 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:40 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 16:30 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 20:56 Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-17 13:31 [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)
• 2003-11-18 21:01 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-18 21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-18 21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-25 13:27 Re: Bug in traditional cpp in gcc 3.3.2 ?

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-11-02 12:02 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-12 13:11 Re: libgcj problems on panther
• 2003-11-15 17:23 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-16 12:53 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-18 06:19 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-29 06:09 Re: Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables

Andrew Haley

• 2003-11-02 17:33 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-02 22:42 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-06 08:42 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 19:42 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-11 22:02 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-13 11:25 New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-18 17:56 [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-19 08:47 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-19 16:56 Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-19 22:12 Re: Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-19 22:23 Re: Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-20 09:26 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-28 18:12 ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-30 10:31 Re: FORTH, anyone?

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-11-04 21:04 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:25 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:28 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 22:00 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 02:51 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 14:12 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 14:20 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 15:22 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 15:38 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 15:53 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 16:12 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 16:32 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-07 02:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch stability
• 2003-11-10 21:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs.tree-optimizer interaction
• 2003-11-10 22:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs.tree-optimizer interaction
• 2003-11-13 19:51 [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval
• 2003-11-13 21:44 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval
• 2003-11-14 15:59 basic block reordering question.
• 2003-11-14 20:25 Re: basic block reordering question.
• 2003-11-14 22:42 Re: basic block reordering question.
• 2003-11-17 16:55 CFG and trees
• 2003-11-19 18:25 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 18:51 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:04 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:39 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:47 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:23 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:29 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:45 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:47 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:49 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-26 01:17 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 03:46 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 03:49 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 13:23 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 18:26 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-28 20:46 GTY GC question
• 2003-11-28 21:21 Re: GTY GC question
• 2003-11-28 21:47 Re: GTY GC question
• 2003-11-29 06:44 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-11-03 21:37 Re: Need GC help
• 2003-11-07 02:45 Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 16:35 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-08 17:45 Re: Bugzilla upgraded
• 2003-11-08 17:59 Re: Bugzilla upgraded
• 2003-11-08 18:10 Re: ix86 optimizer vagaries?
• 2003-11-09 01:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-09 02:03 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi
• 2003-11-09 21:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-13 01:28 Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc
• 2003-11-14 07:01 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-14 22:39 Re: [tree-ssa] on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu hangs.
• 2003-11-15 03:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-15 03:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-19 02:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened
• 2003-11-23 20:37 Re: gcc and LSU rejects
• 2003-11-23 23:16 Re: gcc and LSU rejects
• 2003-11-24 08:28 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-24 19:43 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-24 23:18 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-24 23:38 Re: cvs gcc 3.4 check
• 2003-11-26 05:05 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-27 07:14 Re: odd failures in 20031126 snapshot for g77 testsuite
• 2003-11-29 04:10 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?

Andy

• 2003-11-17 01:47 pascal strings in C

Antti Kerola

• 2003-11-12 13:31 Changing installation dir after building gcc

Arnaud Charlet

• 2003-11-02 11:44 Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-02 22:35 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-03 07:59 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-04 22:24 Re: source code database
• 2003-11-06 08:58 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?
• 2003-11-11 09:59 Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-14 11:56 Re: Can't bootstrap gc cvs HEAD on cygwin: sem_aggr.adb:2097:14: Unmatched actual in call
• 2003-11-21 07:48 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-21 08:21 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-21 10:42 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-21 13:07 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-21 13:10 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139
• 2003-11-25 22:24 Re: Ada GNARL naming convention
• 2003-11-26 17:50 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-30 11:29 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb
• 2003-11-30 13:34 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb
• 2003-11-30 20:03 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb

Arnold Vogelsang

• 2003-11-12 15:45 Successful build of gcc-3.3.2 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f

Arpad Beszedes

• 2003-11-13 15:16 Baselines for CSiBE benchmark

Artem B. Bityuckiy

• 2003-11-17 18:55 Re: Released: An Evolutionary Analysis of GNU C Options

Ashutosh Dixit

• 2003-11-24 15:46 "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc
• 2003-11-24 22:49 Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc

aspiesrule

• 2003-11-04 01:54 g77 ordering of "COMMON A, IPAD" could cause crash on i386 platforms
• 2003-11-04 12:48 Re: g77 ordering of "COMMON A, IPAD" could cause crash on i386 platforms
• 2003-11-26 17:02 (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-26 17:18 Now, we have a problem...
• 2003-11-27 01:34 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-27 01:35 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-27 01:58 Fwd: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-27 23:15 Volatiles and speculative memory access reordering...
• 2003-11-27 23:17 Ptrs to IO space?
• 2003-11-28 20:15 File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 14:14 FORTH, anyone?
• 2003-11-29 21:17 Adding files to Makefile compile/link...
• 2003-11-29 21:30 Good riddance, old GC_get_stack_base...
• 2003-11-29 23:26 Good riddance, again...
• 2003-11-29 23:35 Potential syntax error?
• 2003-11-29 23:48 More on those infernal unmatched braces...
• 2003-11-29 23:55 Syntax error...
• 2003-11-30 00:57 What's with this C construct?

azaka

• 2003-11-26 15:39 Gcc toolkit needed

Bauer, Rich

• 2003-11-04 15:48 GCC & Java Help

Ben Elliston

• 2003-11-10 11:41 Re: compile time using 2.96
• 2003-11-20 09:31 flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 09:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-26 05:34 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-27 23:29 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple

Benjamin Geer

• 2003-11-07 14:58 GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are there anyinter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-11-14 00:01 Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementationpessimizescode
• 2003-11-26 06:54 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-26 16:30 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support

Benoit Poulot-Cazajous

• 2003-11-26 22:38 cachecc1, a gcc cache

Bernardo Innocenti

• 2003-11-01 21:03 Re: [Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap errorin make compare
• 2003-11-04 22:27 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.2/3.4 ColdFire toolchain for uClinux (20031103)
• 2003-11-14 08:26 Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target
• 2003-11-14 19:50 Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target

Bharat Madan

• 2003-11-18 17:20 x386 function prologue

bkorb

• 2003-11-20 21:32 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Bob Rossi

• 2003-11-06 16:36 compile time using 2.96

Brad Lucier

• 2003-11-28 16:45 Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables

Bradley Lucier

• 2003-11-30 19:08 mainline multilib parallel builds still broken

Bruce Korb

• 2003-11-20 23:32 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Bruce Stephens

• 2003-11-05 20:06 Re: source code database

bruno doutriaux

• 2003-11-27 19:39 accessing mirrors

Bryce McKinlay

• 2003-11-03 03:07 Java stack trace vs. the PLT

Carlo Wood

• 2003-11-07 15:32 Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-07 17:38 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-07 20:32 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-08 21:54 Re: Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed
• 2003-11-08 22:22 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-09 04:02 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-09 17:22 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-10 15:16 Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-10 17:14 Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-13 22:26 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 01:28 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 19:35 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-22 06:34 Re: C++ demangler ABI vs. g++
• 2003-11-24 03:39 Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 17:45 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-26 19:53 Re: Now, we have a problem...

cendd

• 2003-11-24 05:15 Re: place internet call from your telephone line

Chandramohan . Seeniappan

• 2003-11-25 16:01 Help needed

Chris Lattner

• 2003-11-05 16:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Critical edge splitting (was: New regressions as of2003-11-04)
• 2003-11-05 16:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Critical edge splitting (was: New regressions as of2003-11-04)
• 2003-11-05 20:19 Re: source code database
• 2003-11-06 20:47 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-06 21:05 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-06 21:55 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 04:59 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 14:57 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:42 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:46 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:51 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:53 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 16:00 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 19:26 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-14 01:22 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 01:36 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 02:57 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 03:11 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 04:11 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 04:38 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 15:04 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 01:49 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 02:12 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-19 21:58 CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document.
• 2003-11-20 20:48 Re: CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document.

Christian Joensson

• 2003-11-05 15:11 gctest (cvs HEAD 20031103) failure to build on sparc64-linux: libtool: link: unable to infer tagged configuration
• 2003-11-05 15:53 Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?
• 2003-11-07 08:48 Failure to build gnatlib and tools on cygwin: sysdep.c: In function `getc_immediate_common': sysdep.c:356: error: storage size of 'otermios_rec' isn't known
• 2003-11-10 07:51 Re: Failure to build gnatlib and tools on cygwin: sysdep.c: In function `getc_immediate_common': sysdep.c:356: error: storage size of 'otermios_rec' isn't known
• 2003-11-10 18:46 Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-11 07:47 Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-11 10:04 Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-11 14:20 Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-12 08:04 Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx
• 2003-11-14 11:42 Can't bootstrap gc cvs HEAD on cygwin: sem_aggr.adb:2097:14: Unmatched actual in call
• 2003-11-15 17:19 Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-17 13:09 Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139
• 2003-11-21 12:48 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139
• 2003-11-22 16:06 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139
• 2003-11-24 09:27 setjmp vs. gcc's __builtin_setjmp [Was: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139]
• 2003-11-25 13:17 gcc cvs HEAD Ada testsuite on cygwin: failed run-time assertion : Tasking not implemented on this configuration
• 2003-11-28 11:08 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb
• 2003-11-28 13:17 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb

Christoph Hellwig

• 2003-11-07 15:30 Re: GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-11-29 18:56 Re: File extensions for C++ source?

Chunhua Liao

• 2003-11-05 19:02 Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?

Craig Martin

• 2003-11-04 17:34 Compiling issues

Czuczy Gergely

• 2003-11-09 15:28 hungarian mirror

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-11-01 19:47 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2003-11-17 18:33 Re: pascal strings in C

Dan Kegel

• 2003-11-02 20:04 Re: Trouble cross-compiling gcc-3.3.2 under MinGW
• 2003-11-02 20:45 Re: Trouble cross-compiling gcc-3.3.2 under MinGW
• 2003-11-06 08:06 --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-06 19:03 Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 19:35 Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 21:06 Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-13 10:08 output format of gcc -E?
• 2003-11-24 17:03 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-25 06:37 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-25 17:01 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-25 17:21 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-28 15:24 re: help with gcc-3.3.2 for ARM

Dan Nicolaescu

• 2003-11-13 19:55 [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-18 17:00 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-24 19:37 Re: Intermodule constant propagation

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-11-04 17:22 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 19:37 Heads up on a bugzilla upgrade
• 2003-11-04 20:56 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 01:57 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 16:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Critical edge splitting (was: New regressions as of 2003-11-04)
• 2003-11-06 20:08 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 22:28 [tree-ssa]: BIND_EXPR removal breaks tree-PTA
• 2003-11-07 18:08 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 18:18 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 18:48 Re: [tree-ssa]: BIND_EXPR removal breaks tree-PTA
• 2003-11-07 18:54 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 19:29 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 19:45 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 20:04 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 20:09 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 20:11 Re: Dwarf question.
• 2003-11-07 20:17 Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed
• 2003-11-07 20:22 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 20:27 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:07 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:25 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:39 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:42 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:06 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:10 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:22 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:31 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:37 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:37 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:44 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:47 gcc-bugzilla-query (Re: Future of gccbug)
• 2003-11-07 23:58 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-08 00:05 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-08 00:32 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-08 16:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-08 17:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-08 17:39 Bugzilla upgraded
• 2003-11-08 17:48 Re: Bugzilla upgraded
• 2003-11-08 18:07 Re: Bugzilla upgraded
• 2003-11-08 18:28 Re: Bugzilla upgraded
• 2003-11-09 16:39 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:16 Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-09 19:18 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:22 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:39 Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-09 19:53 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 20:15 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 16:39 Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-10 19:55 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 21:19 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-13 16:12 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 16:19 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 16:32 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 16:41 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 16:51 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 21:26 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 21:33 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 22:04 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 22:12 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 22:44 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-14 20:27 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-14 20:51 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-17 16:38 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-19 05:19 Re: Compressed rtl project
• 2003-11-21 20:30 Re: gc question
• 2003-11-21 21:48 Re: gc question
• 2003-11-25 19:48 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-25 22:04 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-26 04:26 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 13:50 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-26 13:53 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-27 00:44 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-28 02:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.
• 2003-11-28 20:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.
• 2003-11-30 13:49 Re: Tree-ssa branch does not build

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-11-06 13:58 Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 05:38 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:51 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:52 Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 15:56 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 20:06 Re: Dwarf question.
• 2003-11-10 14:12 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 14:26 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 15:14 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-13 03:16 Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc
• 2003-11-16 17:06 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-17 15:37 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-18 21:40 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-27 04:29 Re: PCH bit me
• 2003-11-29 15:23 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info
• 2003-11-29 16:58 Re: File extensions for C++ source?

Dara Hazeghi

• 2003-11-08 03:05 files in wwwdocs/install?
• 2003-11-08 18:58 Re: files in wwwdocs/install?
• 2003-11-08 21:24 Bug 12098: Detecting a valid assembler
• 2003-11-08 21:48 Deprecate targets targets which remain unbuildable for a long time?
• 2003-11-10 01:58 Typo in i386.c?
• 2003-11-10 02:17 Re: Typo in i386.c?
• 2003-11-10 17:20 Re: Typo in i386.c?
• 2003-11-14 09:16 Shrinking install/specific.html
• 2003-11-14 17:21 Re: Shrinking install/specific.html
• 2003-11-15 00:52 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp

David Carlton

• 2003-11-25 23:12 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-25 23:14 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support

David Edelsohn

• 2003-11-12 17:44 Re: gcc 3.4 and altivec code generation?
• 2003-11-17 20:28 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-19 20:46 Re: Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-19 21:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened
• 2003-11-19 22:15 Re: Question about libffi closure
• 2003-11-21 15:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change
• 2003-11-21 18:18 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change
• 2003-11-21 21:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change
• 2003-11-24 19:43 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-24 20:54 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-25 15:13 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-25 15:31 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-25 17:51 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-29 02:33 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-29 04:06 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-29 04:20 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-29 19:40 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?

Denys Duchier

• 2003-11-28 00:19 asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels
• 2003-11-30 21:41 Re: asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels

Devang Patel

• 2003-11-25 19:42 DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-25 20:15 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support
• 2003-11-30 22:04 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Diego Novillo

• 2003-11-03 17:22 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26
• 2003-11-04 14:39 [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 14:44 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:23 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 01:52 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 14:09 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 15:26 Re: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-05 15:43 RE: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-06 14:14 Re: [tree-ssa] broken test cases
• 2003-11-06 14:33 [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
• 2003-11-07 01:05 [tree-ssa] Branch stability
• 2003-11-07 03:39 [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-07 14:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-07 14:33 Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
• 2003-11-07 14:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-07 14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-08 13:53 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-09 16:26 [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-09 22:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-10 21:12 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 21:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs.tree-optimizer interaction
• 2003-11-10 21:26 [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen
• 2003-11-11 00:22 Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
• 2003-11-11 16:27 [tree-ssa]: Detecting low-GIMPLE (was Re: [tree-ssa] Illegibledumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file)
• 2003-11-13 02:37 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-11-11
• 2003-11-13 16:34 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 20:05 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 20:07 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 20:22 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 21:20 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 23:04 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-17 17:31 Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)
• 2003-11-17 22:19 Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)
• 2003-11-18 20:19 [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-18 21:16 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-18 23:12 [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened
• 2003-11-19 14:16 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-19 14:49 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-20 00:02 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-20 00:07 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-20 00:13 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:17 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:21 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:33 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:34 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:46 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 14:03 Re: [tree-ssa] which snapshot is good
• 2003-11-20 14:12 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-20 21:33 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 00:13 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 03:03 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 03:06 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 19:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?
• 2003-11-25 02:23 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-11-24
• 2003-11-26 13:55 [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.
• 2003-11-26 15:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-26 15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-27 04:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.
• 2003-11-27 16:04 [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots
• 2003-11-28 17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure
• 2003-11-28 18:10 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure
• 2003-11-29 04:26 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure
• 2003-11-29 04:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-29 04:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-30 15:27 [tree-ssa] Merge in progress
• 2003-11-30 18:08 [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions
• 2003-11-30 19:50 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions
• 2003-11-30 23:30 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions

DJ Delorie

• 2003-11-14 02:53 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 02:54 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 03:06 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 01:55 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-22 01:45 jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax
• 2003-11-22 02:03 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax

Dmitry Semyonov

• 2003-11-03 12:10 arm-wince-pe

Dorit Naishlos

• 2003-11-25 12:09 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops

Doug Evans

• 2003-11-06 18:09 using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 19:19 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 22:07 Re: using offsetof with g++

Douglas Gregor

• 2003-11-09 05:51 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.

E. Weddington

• 2003-11-05 18:16 Re: AVR ATtiny2313 port.
• 2003-11-05 18:22 Re: GNU GCC

Edmar Wienskoski

• 2003-11-07 17:49 Dwarf question.

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-11-04 16:00 Re: GCC & Java Help
• 2003-11-05 07:21 Re: GCC & Java Help
• 2003-11-05 09:35 Re: gcc 3.2.3 not compiling
• 2003-11-09 18:39 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 06:49 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 16:56 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi
• 2003-11-12 11:00 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi
• 2003-11-17 09:03 Pointer alignment
• 2003-11-20 11:34 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 21:05 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-24 07:03 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-24 10:01 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-25 07:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-26 05:25 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-28 12:53 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb
• 2003-11-28 15:45 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb
• 2003-11-29 12:16 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb
• 2003-11-30 12:43 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb

Eric Christopher

• 2003-11-09 21:36 Re: Problem in configuring GCC for a new back end
• 2003-11-24 20:27 Re: End-of-unit changes in decl visibility

Erik Trulsson

• 2003-11-18 17:38 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis

Falk Hueffner

• 2003-11-01 16:27 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-01 23:30 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-06 22:01 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-07 09:48 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-16 15:27 Re: Test cases

Fery

• 2003-11-11 09:25 templates with pointer arguments

FEYEL Frederic.

• 2003-11-19 17:30 using a personal "double" type

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-11-21 20:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?

Frank Kohler

• 2003-11-05 16:25 GNU GCC

Franz Sirl

• 2003-11-28 18:21 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?

Gabor Greif

• 2003-11-25 18:07 va_start behaving strange

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-11-04 10:45 Re: Plans for 3.3 series
• 2003-11-04 20:24 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-04 20:47 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-04 21:17 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 00:10 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 00:13 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 00:27 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 01:39 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 01:49 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 20:00 Re: ICE in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1228
• 2003-11-05 20:23 Re: ICE in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1228
• 2003-11-06 02:15 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 03:15 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 19:34 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 19:35 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 19:39 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 19:48 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 19:52 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 19:57 Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-06 20:14 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 20:24 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 20:26 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 21:04 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-06 21:22 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 21:50 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 22:00 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 22:36 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-07 02:16 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-07 04:44 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 14:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-07 14:56 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 16:18 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-07 16:31 Re: Thoughts on "const tree" and "const rtx"?
• 2003-11-07 16:40 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 16:55 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 17:35 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 18:13 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-07 18:58 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 19:12 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 19:20 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-07 19:35 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 19:56 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 20:13 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 20:18 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:16 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:20 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:21 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:30 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-07 22:30 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:36 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:47 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:15 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:20 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-08 00:36 Re: gcc-bugzilla-query (Re: Future of gccbug)
• 2003-11-09 05:06 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-09 05:11 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-09 06:01 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-09 18:18 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 18:19 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:26 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:28 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:30 Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-09 19:48 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 19:49 Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads
• 2003-11-09 20:09 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 20:21 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 18:41 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-11 22:59 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-11 23:23 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-12 00:44 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-12 00:46 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-14 04:00 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 04:08 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 04:26 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 13:28 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 18:51 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 23:45 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 23:52 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-18 04:39 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-19 02:49 Re: Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )type information
• 2003-11-24 16:14 Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc
• 2003-11-29 09:54 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 16:54 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 17:09 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 19:14 Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?
• 2003-11-29 19:41 Re: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?
• 2003-11-29 23:11 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-30 00:11 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-30 00:20 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 01:22 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 01:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 03:15 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 03:57 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 04:43 Re: wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"?
• 2003-11-30 14:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Gabriel Paubert

• 2003-11-25 09:41 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops

Gareth McCaughan

• 2003-11-24 12:08 Re: Bug or my mistake?

gccadmin

• 2003-11-03 17:09 gcc-ss-3.3-20031103 is now available
• 2003-11-05 17:00 gcc-ss-3.4-20031105 is now available
• 2003-11-10 17:07 gcc-ss-3.3-20031110 is now available
• 2003-11-12 17:07 gcc-ss-3.4-20031112 is now available
• 2003-11-17 17:15 gcc-ss-3.3-20031117 is now available
• 2003-11-19 17:07 gcc-ss-3.4-20031119 is now available
• 2003-11-24 17:12 gcc-ss-3.3-20031124 is now available
• 2003-11-26 17:04 gcc-ss-3.4-20031126 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2003-11-02 18:28 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-20 18:38 Re: -B file prefix never used
• 2003-11-26 17:47 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-26 18:06 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?

Geoff Keating

• 2003-11-04 00:42 Re: Question on "tag" and "desc" in GTY
• 2003-11-05 23:34 Re: PCH failures / ICE: Segmentation fault
• 2003-11-06 22:02 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 22:10 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 00:40 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-16 11:48 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-19 23:41 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-21 00:56 Re: Crash in garbage collector
• 2003-11-21 23:56 Re: gc question
• 2003-11-24 21:48 Re: End-of-unit changes in decl visibility
• 2003-11-24 21:52 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-24 21:54 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-25 21:30 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-26 18:58 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-26 19:00 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 19:10 Re: Visibility attribute
• 2003-11-29 22:51 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-30 00:43 Re: PCH bit me
• 2003-11-30 01:08 Re: PCH bit me

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-11-18 06:20 Re: merge_translation_unit_decls / duplicate_decls

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-11-01 13:23 Re: Plans for 3.3 series
• 2003-11-07 11:12 Re: downloadable manual texinfo files and webmaster contact
• 2003-11-08 12:58 Re: files in wwwdocs/install?
• 2003-11-14 19:23 Patch submission procedures
• 2003-11-15 11:54 Re: 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp
• 2003-11-15 20:03 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-15 20:07 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-16 11:26 PATCH for: Broken Documentation Link
• 2003-11-16 12:38 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-16 13:24 cpplib and iconv.h (bootstrap failure)
• 2003-11-16 14:23 Re: Test cases
• 2003-11-16 15:57 Re: 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp
• 2003-11-17 16:54 Re: Shrinking install/specific.html
• 2003-11-18 21:58 Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin:libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )typeinformation
• 2003-11-21 10:40 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-21 11:34 Re: hungarian mirror
• 2003-11-21 12:31 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-22 08:26 Re: Testing C++ changes
• 2003-11-24 10:10 Re: gcc 3.4 and -O4/-O5
• 2003-11-24 14:35 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer
• 2003-11-24 14:42 Re: ASSIGNMENT papers?
• 2003-11-26 12:46 PATCH for Re: New mirror
• 2003-11-27 09:45 fastjar.info not installed any longer?
• 2003-11-27 19:48 Re: accessing mirrors

Gerrit P. Haase

• 2003-11-22 10:39 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139
• 2003-11-22 10:53 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139
• 2003-11-23 04:46 Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing
• 2003-11-30 17:35 Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing

Giannis Aggelis

• 2003-11-01 02:03 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.2/i386-pc-solaris2.9

Giovanni Bajo

• 2003-11-16 12:29 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information
• 2003-11-26 15:36 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes

Glenn Burkhardt

• 2003-11-25 22:23 3.2 code bloat from debug info
• 2003-11-29 18:17 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info
• 2003-11-30 03:09 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info

gnat-dev

• 2003-11-05 04:54 Re: source code database
• 2003-11-05 19:35 Re: Extending C for Modules
• 2003-11-07 20:01 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:16 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 21:51 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:53 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:39 Re: Future of gccbug

Gunther Nikl

• 2003-11-27 10:34 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?

H. J. Lu

• 2003-11-06 15:58 Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-11 21:57 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-11 22:29 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-13 00:05 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-13 01:52 demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 01:14 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 15:59 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 23:06 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-20 18:29 [tree-ssa]: A typo in Makefile.tpl?
• 2003-11-20 20:35 Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-26 06:58 Re: Visibility attribute

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2003-11-27 19:50 Re: New target porting time estimates?

Henrik Sorensen

• 2003-11-20 06:17 [tree-ssa] which snapshot is good

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2003-11-07 04:36 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 14:49 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:06 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:25 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 15:37 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 17:34 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 21:01 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-07 21:15 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:54 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-11 02:20 Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs
• 2003-11-11 20:58 Re: How to add a (sub)target-specific '-W...' or '-f...' option?
• 2003-11-14 02:16 Re: stabs+ debug info
• 2003-11-14 04:15 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 13:42 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 20:32 Re: New target porting time estimates?
• 2003-11-14 22:16 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-18 04:13 Re: New target porting time estimates?
• 2003-11-18 13:21 Re: CVS not executing commands!
• 2003-11-22 02:33 C++ demangler ABI vs. g++
• 2003-11-23 04:46 Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-23 23:40 A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 02:40 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 16:07 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 17:10 Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 18:27 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 22:05 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-29 14:44 Re: arm-elf-gcc and nobits section
• 2003-11-30 03:52 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Jack Howarth

• 2003-11-06 04:20 Why doesn't -fno-common really work???
• 2003-11-06 14:45 re: Why doesn't -fno-common really work???
• 2003-11-11 00:59 sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs
• 2003-11-11 04:41 Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs
• 2003-11-12 16:59 Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs
• 2003-11-12 17:08 gcc 3.4 and altivec code generation?
• 2003-11-12 17:37 g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f
• 2003-11-15 08:33 g77 executable linkage
• 2003-11-16 01:33 gcc IPA?
• 2003-11-19 18:43 why -fno-globals at -O3 with g77
• 2003-11-23 18:50 gcc 3.4 and -O4/-O5
• 2003-11-23 20:11 gcc and LSU rejects
• 2003-11-23 23:05 Re: gcc and LSU rejects
• 2003-11-24 19:26 impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-24 20:46 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-24 23:33 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-24 23:36 cvs gcc 3.4 check
• 2003-11-25 14:06 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-25 17:03 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops
• 2003-11-26 14:33 gcc 3.4 experimental?
• 2003-11-27 03:33 odd failures in 20031126 snapshot for g77 testsuite
• 2003-11-28 21:46 re: Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-11-11 22:11 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-13 10:20 Re: output format of gcc -E?
• 2003-11-19 23:34 Re: Question about libffi closure

James Michael DuPont

• 2003-11-15 04:16 Release of new gcc api technology : introspector datacubes

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-11-23 22:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-11-01 11:35 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-01 23:18 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-01 23:22 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-03 09:07 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 11:52 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 12:02 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 14:48 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 15:56 Re: sizeof(long double) increased from 12 to 16
• 2003-11-03 16:07 Re: i386 GCC-3.4 & Mandrake-9.2 GCC-3.3.1 non-inline memset/memcpy
• 2003-11-04 14:56 Re: i386 GCC-3.4 & Mandrake-9.2 GCC-3.3.1 non-inline memset/memcpy
• 2003-11-05 09:09 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 09:20 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 09:25 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 09:31 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 14:58 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 15:18 Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-05 15:35 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 15:36 Re: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-05 15:43 Re: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-05 16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 16:25 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 16:28 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4
• 2003-11-06 08:50 Re: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-06 17:47 tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-07 11:24 Re: Why does the athlon_fp DFA have so many states?
• 2003-11-07 22:50 [tree-ssa] Gimple and tail calls
• 2003-11-07 23:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Gimple and tail calls
• 2003-11-08 00:18 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-08 16:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-08 17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-08 18:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-09 02:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC
• 2003-11-09 02:38 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi
• 2003-11-09 17:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-10 19:00 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:12 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi
• 2003-11-11 08:56 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-11 17:23 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-11 17:38 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-11 21:26 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-13 00:25 [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt
• 2003-11-13 00:59 Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt
• 2003-11-13 10:40 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-14 10:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-15 01:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-15 01:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-15 16:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-15 23:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-18 18:34 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-18 20:33 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-19 17:44 Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 18:25 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 18:38 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:01 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:06 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:09 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:34 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:36 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:50 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:52 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:23 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:34 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:36 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:51 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 22:13 Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 22:20 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 22:46 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 22:56 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:02 TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-19 23:08 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:17 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:29 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-19 23:30 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:33 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:13 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 00:14 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-20 00:15 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:20 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:29 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:37 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 01:26 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-20 10:04 must_alias question
• 2003-11-20 20:31 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-20 20:50 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 21:44 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-20 22:43 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 23:24 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 23:35 Jump threading and loops
• 2003-11-20 23:56 Re: Jump threading and loops
• 2003-11-21 00:00 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-21 00:30 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 00:47 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 00:57 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-21 01:15 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 01:30 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-21 11:01 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 11:02 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-21 11:06 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 11:09 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-22 15:25 Re: gc question
• 2003-11-23 16:08 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-23 16:22 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 17:33 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 18:19 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 20:06 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 20:21 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax
• 2003-11-24 18:05 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-25 11:11 Re: Intermodule constant propagation
• 2003-11-25 23:54 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-27 08:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-27 21:37 Re: tail-call optimization question
• 2003-11-28 01:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-28 11:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-28 20:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-28 21:01 Re: GTY GC question
• 2003-11-28 21:25 Re: GTY GC question
• 2003-11-28 23:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-30 19:26 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions
• 2003-11-30 19:55 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions
• 2003-11-30 21:45 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions

Jane Williams

• 2003-11-05 01:10 www.iso9000survival.com now links to gnu.org

Jason Merrill

• 2003-11-07 17:34 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-18 21:00 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-19 13:17 Re: Testing C++ changes
• 2003-11-26 06:05 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes
• 2003-11-26 15:31 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes

Jeevan, Joseph John

• 2003-11-19 06:24 getting gcc rpms for older versions

Jeff Gold

• 2003-11-03 14:37 Specifying VPF instructions for ARM?
• 2003-11-04 22:44 Re: Specifying VPF instructions for ARM?
• 2003-11-05 21:49 Re: Specifying VPF instructions for ARM?

Jeff Sturm

• 2003-11-01 20:54 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-19 20:40 Re: Question about libffi closure

Jim Blandy

• 2003-11-30 02:48 Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions

Jim Dehnert

• 2003-11-24 22:03 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI

Jim Wilson

• 2003-11-06 01:23 Re: class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT
• 2003-11-06 01:34 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-06 01:52 Re: -Wl,<options> mechanism
• 2003-11-06 02:10 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 02:31 Re: class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT
• 2003-11-06 02:55 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 03:25 Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling
• 2003-11-06 08:43 Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-06 09:03 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 21:38 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 23:35 Re: Why doesn't -fno-common really work???
• 2003-11-07 00:04 Re: Implementing Library calls
• 2003-11-08 03:42 Re: help setting a register to a constant
• 2003-11-10 02:07 Re: Typo in i386.c?
• 2003-11-10 06:18 Re: Bug 12098: Detecting a valid assembler
• 2003-11-10 06:30 Re: Typo in i386.c?
• 2003-11-11 00:59 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-11 07:39 Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs
• 2003-11-12 07:03 Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling
• 2003-11-12 07:23 Re: C source interspersed through assembly output
• 2003-11-12 08:07 Re: PATCH: RFA reload.c patch
• 2003-11-13 01:26 Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc
• 2003-11-13 05:40 Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc
• 2003-11-13 23:12 Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling
• 2003-11-16 22:27 Re: Macro Labels in local scope: Works with g++ but breaks with gcc
• 2003-11-16 23:10 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-16 23:26 Re: g77 executable linkage
• 2003-11-16 23:35 Re: gcc IPA?
• 2003-11-17 19:52 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-17 20:03 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-17 20:45 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-17 20:49 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-19 06:55 Re: IA64: roblem with OUTGOING_ARG
• 2003-11-19 07:53 Re: Writing a frontend to gcc for a new language developed at Ericsson
• 2003-11-19 08:02 Re: x386 function prologue
• 2003-11-19 08:08 Re: getting gcc rpms for older versions
• 2003-11-20 00:55 Re: CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document.
• 2003-11-27 23:42 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-29 02:13 Re: Help needed
• 2003-11-29 02:24 Re: GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn
• 2003-11-29 02:30 Re: GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn
• 2003-11-29 02:47 Re: va_start behaving strange
• 2003-11-29 02:55 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info
• 2003-11-29 03:04 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.ono such file or directory
• 2003-11-29 03:11 Re: Gcc toolkit needed
• 2003-11-29 03:16 Re: help compiling gcc with -mtune=c3-2
• 2003-11-29 03:24 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?
• 2003-11-29 03:33 Re: sizeof on const
• 2003-11-29 03:35 Re: configuring gcc
• 2003-11-29 22:39 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info
• 2003-11-29 22:56 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 23:09 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-29 23:20 Re: Adding files to Makefile compile/link...
• 2003-11-29 23:24 Re: Good riddance, old GC_get_stack_base...
• 2003-11-29 23:52 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-30 01:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 02:14 Re: Good riddance, again...
• 2003-11-30 02:22 Re: Potential syntax error?
• 2003-11-30 02:27 Re: Syntax error...
• 2003-11-30 02:34 Re: What's with this C construct?
• 2003-11-30 02:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 04:52 Re: wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"?

Joe Buck

• 2003-11-05 18:41 Re: Extending C for Modules
• 2003-11-06 18:18 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 18:34 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 20:16 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 20:42 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 20:49 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-07 17:49 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 18:05 Re: GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)
• 2003-11-07 22:05 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:25 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-12 18:06 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-12 22:30 subversions.gnu.org broken again?
• 2003-11-13 17:40 Re: 64-Bit GCC
• 2003-11-13 19:36 Re: 64-Bit GCC
• 2003-11-13 20:08 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 20:10 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 23:48 Re: 64-Bit GCC
• 2003-11-14 17:40 Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target
• 2003-11-14 19:03 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-21 21:45 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-22 01:54 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax
• 2003-11-24 17:08 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-11-03 19:08 Re: Running the preprocessor in reverse
• 2003-11-03 19:44 Re: Calculation of displacement of a variable.
• 2003-11-13 15:58 g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)

John David Anglin

• 2003-11-22 02:14 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.4, first pass
• 2003-11-22 02:28 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change

John Lu

• 2003-11-06 16:41 Implementing Library calls

John Marshall

• 2003-11-13 11:57 Re: output format of gcc -E?

John R. Shannon

• 2003-11-25 18:02 Ada GNARL naming convention

John S. Dyson

• 2003-11-12 05:21 Re: something that would be nice

Jon Beniston

• 2003-11-20 18:25 Crash in garbage collector
• 2003-11-26 13:34 RE: Crash in garbage collector

Jonathan Thornburg

• 2003-11-10 10:54 successful build/install of gcc 3.3.2 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.3

Jonathan Wilson

• 2003-11-30 04:34 wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"?

Jonathan Yavner

• 2003-11-06 21:02 Source code database

Joost VandeVondele

• 2003-11-16 15:01 Re: Test Cases

Josef Zlomek

• 2003-11-09 06:57 Re: Dwarf question.
• 2003-11-18 14:20 Re: basic block reordering question.
• 2003-11-29 20:52 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-11-04 22:56 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 00:19 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 00:41 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 18:09 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.htmlcorrect?
• 2003-11-07 10:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch stability
• 2003-11-07 18:24 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:21 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:54 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:40 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-13 16:09 Re: g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)
• 2003-11-14 10:05 Re: Shrinking install/specific.html

Josephine O'Para

• 2003-11-18 21:57 RE: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/)

jyavner_BulkUCE

• 2003-11-02 04:44 Running the preprocessor in reverse
• 2003-11-02 04:45 Running the preprocessor in reverse

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-11-08 11:21 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-24 08:17 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-29 16:00 Re: File extensions for C++ source?

Kate Minola

• 2003-11-12 20:23 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.2 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-11-13 15:31 Re: Deliberate padding between static and stack variables?
• 2003-11-23 14:09 Re: Why symcat.h is not included anymore?

Kelley Cook

• 2003-11-30 01:07 [Committed] Install gccinstall.info (was fastjar.info not installed any longer?)

Ken Wolcott

• 2003-11-07 15:48 Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-18 21:23 Re: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/)
• 2003-11-18 22:59 Re: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/)
• 2003-11-26 21:06 __null is set to zero? (gcc/cp/lex.c 3.3.2 src) using Gimpel Flexelint

Kevin Rose

• 2003-11-27 22:36 successful build 3.3.2 with i386-pc-solaris2.9

Kris Warkentin

• 2003-11-28 18:06 ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?
• 2003-11-29 18:14 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?

Krishnamurthy, Balaji

• 2003-11-13 17:26 64-Bit GCC
• 2003-11-13 17:45 RE: 64-Bit GCC

Lally Singh

• 2003-11-21 02:16 Bug or my mistake?

Lars Albertsson

• 2003-11-14 08:36 Re: Extension of the CSiBE benchmark

Laurent GUERBY

• 2003-11-02 21:25 Re: Change in employment
• 2003-11-04 19:37 Re: source code database
• 2003-11-04 23:23 Re: PCH failures / ICE: Segmentation fault
• 2003-11-28 11:59 Ada test failures at -O2
• 2003-11-28 17:26 Re: Ada test failures at -O2

law

• 2003-11-04 18:38 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 20:51 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:51 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 21:55 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-04 22:09 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 00:08 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 03:20 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 04:07 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 04:12 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 04:51 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 18:55 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:00 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:09 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:10 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 20:10 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-10 20:51 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 20:53 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 21:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs. tree-optimizer interaction
• 2003-11-10 21:46 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 23:11 Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
• 2003-11-11 21:06 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-13 04:42 Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 04:51 Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt
• 2003-11-13 05:01 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-13 16:29 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 16:48 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 21:10 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval
• 2003-11-13 22:47 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval
• 2003-11-14 19:39 More PRE problems
• 2003-11-17 15:09 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-17 15:55 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-17 16:36 Re: [tree-ssa] moving phi nodes?
• 2003-11-17 16:39 Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)
• 2003-11-17 19:27 Re: More PRE problems
• 2003-11-18 17:15 Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit
• 2003-11-18 17:31 Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit
• 2003-11-18 20:30 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-18 20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-18 21:15 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-19 05:04 Re: Compressed rtl project
• 2003-11-19 18:05 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 18:48 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:01 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:12 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:14 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:26 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 19:34 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:47 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 20:49 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:28 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:30 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:45 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 22:17 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 22:25 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 22:27 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 22:31 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 22:31 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 22:50 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:02 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:12 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:23 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 00:41 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-20 16:45 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-21 06:35 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-21 07:20 Re: must_alias question
• 2003-11-21 20:27 gc question
• 2003-11-21 21:09 Re: gc question
• 2003-11-25 23:49 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 03:03 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 03:06 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 04:26 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 04:28 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 05:29 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 17:59 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 18:41 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 19:18 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 21:26 Re: [tree-ssa] We are removing annotations, or are we???

Leandro Lucarella

• 2003-11-21 22:54 g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy.

Long Fei

• 2003-11-06 00:58 Parse tree-dump
• 2003-11-06 01:57 RE: Parse tree-dump
• 2003-11-06 02:12 RE: Parse tree-dump

lrtaylor

• 2003-11-04 17:37 RE: Compiling issues

M A

• 2003-11-18 20:47 New mirror

Maciej Zenczykowski

• 2003-11-15 22:01 GCC/G++ Idea

Marc Espie

• 2003-11-25 12:53 Bug in traditional cpp in gcc 3.3.2 ?
• 2003-11-29 15:48 PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp
• 2003-11-29 23:21 Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp

Mark Kettenis

• 2003-11-27 23:08 DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer
• 2003-11-28 10:58 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer
• 2003-11-29 11:53 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-11-02 22:03 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-11 05:28 Re: Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed
• 2003-11-13 16:40 Re: g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)
• 2003-11-15 18:14 Re: 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp
• 2003-11-19 19:09 Re: Testing C++ changes
• 2003-11-22 01:16 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-22 01:20 Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types inmainline
• 2003-11-22 01:23 Re: Targets to obsolete for 3.4, second pass
• 2003-11-24 02:09 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI
• 2003-11-24 07:17 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI

Markus Johansson

• 2003-11-20 12:25 -B file prefix never used
• 2003-11-20 19:21 Re: -B file prefix never used

Martin Reinecke

• 2003-11-19 10:45 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis

Martin Sebor

• 2003-11-07 18:37 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.

Marty Hauff

• 2003-11-05 03:35 Re: AVR ATtiny2313 port.
• 2003-11-12 03:31 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-12 03:36 C source interspersed through assembly output
• 2003-11-13 01:27 script to intersperse C code throughout assembly dump

Mathieu Lacage

• 2003-11-04 14:24 source code database

Matt

• 2003-11-05 18:09 Extending C for Modules

Matt Austern

• 2003-11-06 19:04 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 20:45 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-06 20:57 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 21:39 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
• 2003-11-06 22:37 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-07 00:55 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-08 22:36 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-09 05:45 Re: Degraded C++ error messages.
• 2003-11-11 23:12 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-14 20:51 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 00:18 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-26 05:30 Visibility attribute
• 2003-11-30 05:34 Re: File extensions for C++ source?

Matt Wells

• 2003-11-11 22:48 something that would be nice
• 2003-11-11 23:07 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-11 23:13 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-11 23:25 Re: something that would be nice

Matthias Klose

• 2003-11-03 22:22 Re: [Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap errorin make compare

McM57

• 2003-11-24 20:14 GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn

Melvin Hadasht

• 2003-11-15 20:16 [tree-ssa] ICE while compiling tree-ssa with another tree-ssain fortran/match.c

Michael Beach

• 2003-11-04 05:44 Problem building sh-elf cross gcc under Cygwin

Michael Eager

• 2003-11-08 00:01 Fix to rounding errors in fp-bit.c

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-11-02 16:26 sizeof(long double) increased from 12 to 16
• 2003-11-03 14:52 Re: sizeof(long double) increased from 12 to 16
• 2003-11-29 06:41 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info

Michael Matz

• 2003-11-05 15:33 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-06 14:20 Re: -Wl,<options> mechanism
• 2003-11-06 20:18 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 21:51 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-06 22:21 Re: using offsetof with g++
• 2003-11-14 18:38 IA64: roblem with OUTGOING_ARG

Michel Lespinasse

• 2003-11-12 03:55 Re: C source interspersed through assembly output

Mihai Burcea

• 2003-11-07 21:48 help setting a register to a constant

Mikael Wittberg

• 2003-11-16 23:06 Writing a frontend to gcc for a new language developed at Ericsson

mike

• 2003-11-05 01:48 AVR ATtiny2313 port.

mike peace

• 2003-11-02 12:07 can we meet, it will be nice

Mike Stump

• 2003-11-01 07:02 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2003-11-03 20:14 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-05 23:30 Re: PCH failures / ICE: Segmentation fault
• 2003-11-06 22:55 Re: compile time using 2.96
• 2003-11-07 20:13 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-07 20:13 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-10 22:35 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-11 23:05 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-12 00:40 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-19 20:16 Re: using a personal "double" type

Mircea Namolaru

• 2003-11-24 08:03 Intermodule constant propagation

Mohammed Sultan

• 2003-11-24 11:03 Linux compiler Question

mohanlal jangir

• 2003-11-25 07:02 building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory
• 2003-11-25 10:39 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory
• 2003-11-26 12:05 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory

Musachy Barroso

• 2003-11-27 18:55 tail-call optimization question

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-11-21 08:53 Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types inmainline
• 2003-11-23 15:58 Re: g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy.

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-11-04 06:34 Help wanted: cpp --traditional vs. X Windows
• 2003-11-07 18:58 Targets to obsolete for 3.4, second pass
• 2003-11-29 03:44 Re: File extensions for C++ source?

Naveen Sharma, Noida

• 2003-11-07 09:28 Re: Why does the athlon_fp DFA have so many states?
• 2003-11-17 10:20 [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.
• 2003-11-30 12:14 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.

Neil Booth

• 2003-11-29 21:53 Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp

Nic Ferrier

• 2003-11-06 23:28 downloadable manual texinfo files and webmaster contact
• 2003-11-07 11:18 Re: downloadable manual texinfo files and webmaster contact

Nicholas Nethercote

• 2003-11-13 12:29 Deliberate padding between static and stack variables?

Nicola Pero

• 2003-11-03 10:48 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer

Nitin Jain

• 2003-11-09 11:45 Problem in configuring GCC for a new back end

Olivier Hainque

• 2003-11-05 18:06 DWARF2 unwinding/eh support on VxWorks ?

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-11-18 08:07 CVS not executing commands!
• 2003-11-18 08:22 Re: CVS not executing commands!
• 2003-11-18 12:13 Re: JAVA COMPILER

Patricia Peratto

• 2003-11-28 18:40 configuring gcc

Paul Brook

• 2003-11-02 16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-17 19:39 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-27 15:21 Fwd: Severe performance degradation when calling functions

Paul Eggert

• 2003-11-20 18:57 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 21:02 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-21 00:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-24 06:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-24 09:41 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-24 20:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-25 21:55 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-28 23:22 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Pavel Pisa

• 2003-11-14 15:44 State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-17 20:49 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)

Per Bothner

• 2003-11-03 07:36 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-05 21:43 Re: PCH failures / ICE: Segmentation fault
• 2003-11-18 05:54 merge_translation_unit_decls / duplicate_decls
• 2003-11-19 04:09 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-30 06:24 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 07:10 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

peter

• 2003-11-02 18:27 Trouble cross-compiling gcc-3.3.2 under MinGW

Peter Barada

• 2003-11-01 18:09 Re: Change in employment
• 2003-11-02 20:25 Re: Trouble cross-compiling gcc-3.3.2 under MinGW
• 2003-11-14 05:42 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-14 15:59 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)

Phil Edwards

• 2003-11-05 05:09 Re: www.iso9000survival.com now links to gnu.org
• 2003-11-07 20:30 Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 20:51 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-08 00:27 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-15 00:01 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 01:47 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-20 22:27 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-21 07:05 Slightly ambiguous wording in cppopts.texi
• 2003-11-24 16:26 Re: Linux compiler Question
• 2003-11-28 21:04 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 04:01 Re: File extensions for C++ source?
• 2003-11-29 21:34 Re: FORTH, anyone?
• 2003-11-30 01:12 Re: FORTH, anyone?
• 2003-11-30 01:55 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 07:03 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

qinfeng . zhang

• 2003-11-05 08:07 class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT
• 2003-11-06 01:39 Re: class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT
• 2003-11-06 01:59 RE: Parse tree-dump
• 2003-11-25 10:07 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no suchfile or directory
• 2003-11-25 10:47 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no suchfile or directory

Rainer Orth

• 2003-11-05 16:51 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?
• 2003-11-05 18:25 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.htmlcorrect?
• 2003-11-06 16:50 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?
• 2003-11-07 16:49 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 18:18 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-20 14:12 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 19:14 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 21:15 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 21:19 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-20 21:55 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-21 00:44 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Ralf Corsepius

• 2003-11-18 18:48 cross gnatmake doesn't find cross tools

Ranjit Mathew

• 2003-11-05 04:33 Re: GCC & Java Help
• 2003-11-05 09:48 Re: GCC & Java Help
• 2003-11-07 04:47 Why does the athlon_fp DFA have so many states?
• 2003-11-18 12:02 Re: JAVA COMPILER
• 2003-11-18 12:20 Re: Can I convert Java codes to C++ codes via your gcc/gcj software?

Rayson Ho

• 2003-11-12 04:06 RE: C source interspersed through assembly output

Rene Rebe

• 2003-11-02 11:37 [ICE] g++-3.3.2
• 2003-11-02 11:44 [ICE] g++-3.2.3 (fixed in 3.3(.2))
• 2003-11-05 14:08 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler

rich_d

• 2003-11-01 17:55 Re: Change in employment

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-11-04 01:05 Re: Specifying VPF instructions for ARM?
• 2003-11-05 19:24 Re: Specifying VPF instructions for ARM?
• 2003-11-09 15:20 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 16:43 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-09 16:47 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 10:33 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 10:44 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-13 16:18 Re: g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)
• 2003-11-18 17:36 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-24 15:56 Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc
• 2003-11-29 14:55 Re: arm-elf-gcc and nobits section

Richard Guenther

• 2003-11-01 11:47 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4
• 2003-11-04 16:18 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4
• 2003-11-05 16:25 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4
• 2003-11-05 19:54 ICE in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1228
• 2003-11-05 20:18 Re: ICE in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1228
• 2003-11-06 16:07 Re: ICE in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1228
• 2003-11-06 21:52 Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-06 22:16 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-07 09:00 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-08 12:25 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-10 11:07 HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 12:03 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 12:33 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 14:24 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 14:29 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-10 15:50 Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?
• 2003-11-13 20:37 Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy
• 2003-11-13 21:42 Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizescode
• 2003-11-13 21:53 Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizescode

Richard Henderson

• 2003-11-01 20:16 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-01 20:18 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4
• 2003-11-03 08:02 Re: Java stack trace vs. the PLT
• 2003-11-03 08:07 Re: Java stack trace vs. the PLT
• 2003-11-03 22:39 Re: Need GC help
• 2003-11-04 23:09 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 00:27 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-05 19:52 Re: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-07 23:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Gimple and tail calls
• 2003-11-09 18:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-10 22:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs. tree-optimizer interaction
• 2003-11-11 17:10 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions
• 2003-11-13 00:51 Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt
• 2003-11-13 01:48 Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt
• 2003-11-13 21:53 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 21:57 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-14 10:07 Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target
• 2003-11-14 20:17 Re: basic block reordering question.
• 2003-11-14 22:31 Re: basic block reordering question.
• 2003-11-15 19:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2003-11-16 06:25 [tree-ssa] moving phi nodes?
• 2003-11-17 22:12 Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)
• 2003-11-18 18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-19 00:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RETURN_EXPR argument
• 2003-11-19 06:56 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-19 14:39 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias
• 2003-11-19 18:56 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:01 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:18 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:26 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:44 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 21:45 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure
• 2003-11-19 23:20 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-19 23:21 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:27 Re: Tree sharing issues...
• 2003-11-19 23:46 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 17:48 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 21:40 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 23:18 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-20 23:52 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
• 2003-11-21 08:10 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?
• 2003-11-27 23:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-27 23:44 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer
• 2003-11-27 23:48 Re: Volatiles and speculative memory access reordering...
• 2003-11-27 23:49 Re: Ptrs to IO space?
• 2003-11-28 20:38 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer
• 2003-11-28 21:58 [rfc] debugging anonymous unions
• 2003-11-28 22:11 Re: asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels
• 2003-11-29 19:20 Re: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?
• 2003-11-30 20:43 Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions

Richard Kenner

• 2003-11-01 15:03 Re: Change in employment
• 2003-11-01 18:27 Re: Change in employment
• 2003-11-02 19:41 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-02 20:09 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 00:56 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 21:33 Need GC help
• 2003-11-03 21:39 Re: Need GC help
• 2003-11-03 21:45 Question on "tag" and "desc" in GTY
• 2003-11-03 22:49 Re: Need GC help
• 2003-11-04 02:06 Re: Question on "tag" and "desc" in GTY
• 2003-11-14 15:01 Re: Ada is still broken on AMD64 and IA64 (Was: Re: Ada config for x86_64-linux)
• 2003-11-26 18:58 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?
• 2003-11-28 16:19 Re: Ada test failures at -O2
• 2003-11-30 00:04 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-11-19 21:22 End-of-unit changes in decl visibility
• 2003-11-24 22:39 Re: Crash in garbage collector

Richard Stallman

• 2003-11-22 21:28 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-25 04:37 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

Richard Tierney

• 2003-11-14 18:44 New target porting time estimates?
• 2003-11-17 09:31 Re: New target porting time estimates?

Robert Dewar

• 2003-11-01 12:21 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2003-11-01 19:52 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2003-11-01 19:53 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers
• 2003-11-02 18:12 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-02 18:32 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-03 03:14 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-03 03:51 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-04 14:40 Re: source code database
• 2003-11-12 12:09 Re: something that would be nice
• 2003-11-13 23:41 Re: 64-Bit GCC
• 2003-11-14 18:40 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-15 12:28 Re: New target porting time estimates?
• 2003-11-15 12:54 Re: Disable warnings in code
• 2003-11-30 01:06 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 01:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 01:44 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Robert Moss

• 2003-11-24 15:08 Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot20031119
• 2003-11-25 00:44 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-25 10:29 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-25 11:07 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-25 12:05 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-26 06:03 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
• 2003-11-26 17:34 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119

Robert Vazan

• 2003-11-02 10:20 Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-07 13:02 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-08 12:41 Re: Precompiled headers
• 2003-11-14 13:52 Re: Precompiled headers

Roberto Bagnara

• 2003-11-08 17:57 ix86 optimizer vagaries?
• 2003-11-08 19:09 Re: ix86 optimizer vagaries?

Roger Sayle

• 2003-11-02 14:17 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-07 15:03 Thoughts on "const tree" and "const rtx"?

Ross Smith

• 2003-11-07 05:33 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?
• 2003-11-08 01:08 Re: Use assert()s for optimization?

Russ Allbery

• 2003-11-26 22:59 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}

S. Bosscher

• 2003-11-05 15:38 RE: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-05 16:06 RE: Gimplification and simplification
• 2003-11-09 12:46 RE: Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed

s7726

• 2003-11-14 08:25 Successful Build - gcc-3.3.2

Sammy

• 2003-11-18 09:40 JAVA COMPILER

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-11-17 18:44 Released: An Evolutionary Analysis of GNU C Options
• 2003-11-17 19:05 Re: Released: An Evolutionary Analysis of GNU C Options
• 2003-11-18 15:12 Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-18 17:32 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-18 18:25 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-18 18:28 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-18 19:02 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis
• 2003-11-23 16:15 Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 17:21 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 18:09 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-23 20:57 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-24 00:09 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
• 2003-11-29 18:26 Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 01:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 13:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 13:53 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Stephan T. Lavavej

• 2003-11-01 07:47 gcc-3.4-20031029 bootstrap FAILURE (MinGW)
• 2003-11-02 20:39 Re: Trouble cross-compiling gcc-3.3.2 under MinGW
• 2003-11-16 10:11 Broken Documentation Link
• 2003-11-17 06:24 RE: PATCH for: Broken Documentation Link
• 2003-11-22 00:01 Re: g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy.

Steve Kargl

• 2003-11-01 05:34 [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-01 21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-01 21:15 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-02 16:16 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken

Steve Naroff

• 2003-11-03 19:41 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-11-01 21:05 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-10 19:34 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-11 00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
• 2003-11-13 07:23 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 17:20 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 22:04 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 22:39 Re: Extreme PRE compile times
• 2003-11-13 23:24 Bugzilla request: time for a 3.5 target
• 2003-11-18 20:37 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-19 22:59 Do we still need ggc-simple
• 2003-11-25 23:04 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-25 23:25 [tree-ssa] We are removing annotations, or are we???
• 2003-11-25 23:56 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-26 23:57 Re: thanks for the memory work
• 2003-11-28 17:08 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure
• 2003-11-28 17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure
• 2003-11-29 00:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure
• 2003-11-30 15:00 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Steven Bosschner

• 2003-11-06 12:58 [tree-ssa] broken test cases

Tal Agmon

• 2003-11-05 14:34 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-05 15:52 -Wl,<options> mechanism
• 2003-11-06 14:16 Re: -Wl,<options> mechanism
• 2003-11-10 12:53 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-10 14:32 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-17 19:17 Re: problem with subregs.
• 2003-11-23 12:51 Why symcat.h is not included anymore?
• 2003-11-27 15:59 sizeof on const
• 2003-11-27 17:57 Re: problem with subregs.

Theodore Papadopoulo

• 2003-11-07 15:39 Re: Thoughts on "const tree" and "const rtx"?

Theron Espinoza

• 2003-11-28 17:33 best meds at the best price...............................................................................

Thomas Neumann

• 2003-11-16 18:23 Re: Test cases

Timothy J. Wood

• 2003-11-01 01:34 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer

tm_gccmail

• 2003-11-07 19:56 Re: GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are thereany inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)
• 2003-11-14 19:40 Re: Macro Labels in local scope: Works with g++ but breaks with gcc
• 2003-11-14 19:46 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-14 19:57 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-14 22:10 Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
• 2003-11-17 19:28 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-17 20:23 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-21 21:39 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-24 20:24 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

Tom Lord

• 2003-11-01 23:53 Re: Change in employment

Tom Tromey

• 2003-11-11 19:11 New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-12 00:32 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-12 00:34 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-14 18:10 Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31
• 2003-11-18 23:43 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
• 2003-11-19 20:02 Re: Testing C++ changes
• 2003-11-23 19:30 Re: Testing C++ changes

Toon Moene

• 2003-11-01 12:45 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-01 14:48 Re: Change in employment
• 2003-11-02 14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-06 21:01 Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.htmlcorrect?
• 2003-11-12 21:38 [Problem in inlining, web.c] Re: g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f
• 2003-11-14 22:32 [tree-ssa] on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu hangs.
• 2003-11-17 23:00 Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)
• 2003-11-19 23:10 Re: why -fno-globals at -O3 with g77
• 2003-11-30 12:45 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Tron Thomas

• 2003-11-15 04:07 Disable warnings in code

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-11-20 23:47 Ada: jmp_buf size incorrect

varaya

• 2003-11-04 23:27 gcc 3.2.3 not compiling

Volker Reichelt

• 2003-11-04 12:04 Re: [ICE] g++-3.3.2
• 2003-11-07 16:30 Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 17:29 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-19 13:23 Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types in mainline
• 2003-11-26 00:49 [www-patch] Testing C++ changes
• 2003-11-26 14:40 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes

Waldek Hebisch

• 2003-11-14 01:53 stabs+ debug info

Wayne Fordyce

• 2003-11-29 06:13 gcc 3.3.2 built for AIX 5.2.0.0

web

• 2003-11-10 13:28 8080.com.cn
• 2003-11-10 13:35 8080.com.cn

Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)

• 2003-11-06 16:56 no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?
• 2003-11-07 02:38 Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2003-11-07 15:55 Re: Degraded C++ error messages
• 2003-11-07 22:21 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 14:06 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-10 14:10 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-14 02:43 Re: Bugzilla request: time for a 3.5 target
• 2003-11-19 15:08 Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types in mainline

xueheng

• 2003-11-18 08:24 Can I convert Java codes to C++ codes via your gcc/gcj software?

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-11-01 20:47 Re: [tree-ssa] configuring g77 appears broken
• 2003-11-02 19:40 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-02 19:47 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-02 21:40 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 01:42 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-03 03:38 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8?
• 2003-11-03 09:11 Re: Ada updates frozen
• 2003-11-04 02:00 Re: g77 ordering of "COMMON A, IPAD" could cause crash on i386platforms
• 2003-11-04 06:48 Re: Help wanted: cpp --traditional vs. X Windows
• 2003-11-06 20:03 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 20:42 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 20:48 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 21:02 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-06 22:10 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-07 16:56 Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?
• 2003-11-07 18:13 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 22:44 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:03 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:09 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:19 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-07 23:25 Re: Future of gccbug
• 2003-11-26 02:03 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-27 08:03 Re: Slightly ambiguous wording in cppopts.texi
• 2003-11-27 10:50 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-29 00:25 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
• 2003-11-29 01:36 Re: Disable warnings in code
• 2003-11-29 23:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 00:13 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
• 2003-11-30 02:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-11-03 16:47 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26
• 2003-11-05 16:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Critical edge splitting (was: New regressions as of 2003-11-04)
• 2003-11-05 16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Critical edge splitting (was: New regressions as of 2003-11-04)
• 2003-11-05 16:49 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-06 16:20 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question
• 2003-11-07 08:25 Re: [tree-ssa]: BIND_EXPR removal breaks tree-PTA
• 2003-11-07 08:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-07 13:03 Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes
• 2003-11-07 14:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-08 16:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file
• 2003-11-09 20:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-09 22:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.
• 2003-11-10 19:02 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:29 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:40 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 19:54 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-10 21:53 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
• 2003-11-19 00:20 [tree-ssa] RETURN_EXPR argument
• 2003-11-19 00:35 Compressed rtl project
• 2003-11-20 23:46 Re: Jump threading and loops
• 2003-11-21 19:01 [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?
• 2003-11-21 19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?
• 2003-11-26 12:58 [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-26 15:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-27 09:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-27 09:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.
• 2003-11-28 23:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
• 2003-11-29 10:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-11-04 20:16 Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-04 20:37 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-04 21:03 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-04 22:11 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 00:59 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 01:32 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-05 06:40 Re: Incomplete TREE_CONSTANT-propagation in build() ?
• 2003-11-11 20:53 How to add a (sub)target-specific '-W...' or '-f...' option?
• 2003-11-11 22:00 Re: How to add a (sub)target-specific '-W...' or '-f...' option?

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)