This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Future of gccbug

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>, Andrew Pinski <apinski at apple dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Date: 09 Nov 2003 20:24:54 +0100
Subject: Re: Future of gccbug
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <200311091643.hA9GhRO12294@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><m365htpft8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><200311091937.11271.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> writes:

| > | Well, we still have gcc-prs.  My suggestion would be to send only new
| > | messages to gcc-bugs, and all the bug-tracking dross to gcc-prs.
| >
| > Wholeheartly seconded.
| 
| I don't know whether this has something to do with my nationality, but I 

I hope not !!! (I would not want to turn GCC related issues into
"nation war"). 

| can't help seconding your "wholeheartly seconded" :-)

| Btw, did you get my approval request for the Solaris patch?

Hmm, I thought I replied "yes"...

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]