This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer
- From: Nicola Pero <nicola at brainstorm dot co dot uk>
- To: Ziemowit Laski <zlaski at apple dot com>
- Cc: Adam Fedor <fedor at doc dot com>, <discuss-gnustep at gnu dot org>, gcc list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:53:13 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer
> > We would be happy to have Andrew become libobjc maintainer. Andrew
> > seems to have some motivation to apply outstanding patches and good
> > ideas for the future. However, being the other large user of GCC
> > Objective-C (and the major user of GNU libobjc), I think we would like
> > to see a GNUstep developer be appointed as a co-maintainer. I think
> > it is important that we have some visibility and authority over the
> > long-term direction of the system.
> >
> > If you agree, I'd like to nominate Nicola Pero. Nicola already has
> > write-on-approval status with GCC and has actively been involved in
> > patching and improving GCC Objective-C and libobjc.
>
> Yes, absolutely. It would be good to have one maintainer who actually
> lives on the GNU runtime day-to-day, and then another who has exposure
> to the Darwin side of things (esp. differences between the GNU and NeXT
> runtimes). So, if Nicola agrees to run for office :-), I'm definitely
> for nominating both him and Andrew.
Yes, I do.
Btw I think the idea of merging the two runtimes is brilliant :-)
But It'd require a lot of cooperation, and also a lot of work, so it might
be more of a long-term wish than an immediate deliverable. But I'd be
very happy to help with it / coordinate GNUstep efforts to help with it.