This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed


Why was stage3 declared before some of the invasive patches posted during stage2 were reviewed?

A few of them (such as var-tracking), originally submitted during stage2, weren't reviewed until stage3, and were then shot down as too invasive.

It really seems a bit odd to say that people should submit certain types of patches during certain stages, and then we declare the beginning of a new stage and reject the old patches.

I don't believe we should have declared stage3 until the outstanding "obviously inapproriate for stage3" stage2 patches were reviewed.

--Dan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]