Re: Future of gccbug

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Nov 7, 2003, at 6:40 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
>
> > I have a feeling something is changing the message-id on us when it 
> > sends
> > it to a remote server, but not when it sends it locally to the list
> > delivery process.
>
> It appears that none of the follow-up messages have a message-id when 
> sent
> out by bugzilla, so that they get one generated by the MTA.  Only the
> first message of a bug has the previously mentioned message-id format.
Yup.
It's a problem in Bugzilla, but i'm not sure how to do this, since we
1. Send out each email seperately (IE it's not processing them as a 
group)
2. We only know whether a bug email is because of a new bug or not.

I'll see what i can come up with.

> These are two message-ids of the mails I received for a bug where I'm 
> on
> the cc list:
>
> Message-ID: <20031106044749.14931.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20031106044749.14953.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
>
> This is the reference in the mails:
>
> References: <20030407161600.10339.ubell@sleepycat.com>
>
> Andreas.
>
> --