Re: Future of gccbug

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

gnat-dev@buzco.nyct.net writes:

| I find the mail and WWW interfaces +both+ useful, but it would be nicer
| if bugzilla mail +visibly+ came from bugzilla.

I would add one more whish.  Threads managed by bugzilla is painful to
follow: The reason is that it does not keep proper references.  The end
result is a "flat" thread where every reply gets paranted by the first
message, instead of the usual thread tree.  that forces launching a
browser to point to gcc.gnu.org/whatever (only to get annotations like
"comment #foo") to have a better view of  mails that are on my disk.

I have a question:  with previous gntas, I could ask for retreiving a
set of bug reports (with gnat-query) which I can consult later *off-line*.
Is there an equivalent thing with bugzilla?  Last-time I tried "query",
it only stores an url, whereas I was asking for "physical"  copies of
the reports.

-- Gaby